GENOCIDE
Aspartame, Splenda, Equal, NutraSweet, Equal Measure, Spoonful, Canderal (E951)
(Sweet 'N Low is still proven to be safe)
Betty Martini web site: http://www.dorway.com
Top Experts Expose Bogus 'Aspartame Is Safe' Study
From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum
Tuesday, April 11, 2006
http://www.rense.com/general70/topexpertsexpose.htm
Desperate to reverse growing public awareness and scientific proof that the artificial sweetener aspartame is a deadly neurotoxin, the Calorie Control Council (CCC) issued a press release stating that a federal food survey proves that aspartame is safe. The move is seen by many to be a face-saving gesture by the CCC, a self-described weigh-loss advocacy group, that has been advising a calorie-conscious public to use this non-caloric, excitoneurotoxic, carcinogenic drug since the 80s. They are a Public Relations organization, well known as an aspartame front group.
According to the April 4, 2006 CCC press release, "A new epidemiology study from the National Cancer Institute confirms previous study conclusions that there is no link between aspartame consumption and leukemias, lymphomas and brain tumors."
The release also quotes unnamed "researchers" as stating, "Our findings from this epidemiologic study suggest that consumption of aspartame-containing beverages does not raise the risk of hematopoietic or brain malignancies."
The release fails to mention that the quote was taken from a presentation entitled, "Prospective study of aspartame-containing beverages and risk of hematopoietic and brain cancers," by Unhee Lim, et. al.
Lim's team analyzed data from a "self-administered baseline food frequency questionnaire" administered during 1995/96 to over 500,000 men and women between the ages of 50 and 69.
Among the 16-page survey's 56 questions ranging from oatmeal and brownies to strawberries in season and hysterectomies, aspartame is only mentioned once to determine "frequency and 'diet' type preference of three potentially aspartame-containing beverages (soda, fruit drinks, and iced tea) as well as aspartame added to coffee and hot tea."
The "prospective study" was delivered at the annual American Association of Cancer Research meeting in Washington, D.C. April 4, 2006. The abstract explains how Lim and his team of researchers developed mathematical equations to demonstrate that the results of a non-scientific food survey and its five-year follow-up period indicate no scientific association between aspartame consumption and specific cancers. Regardless of the theoretical "suggestions" of Lim's "prospective study," other aspartame front groups, such as the American Beverage Association, have revealed themselves by endorsing the study as proof that aspartame is safe.
Even the researchers who designed the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) used on this study acknowledged that results obtained may be scientifically invalid. "...Furthermore, a single FFQ-based measurement in adulthood may not represent long-term intake without error and may not assess the diet accurately for times when exposure is most critical in determining disease outcome...".
"Once again the Calorie Control Council circulates utter nonsense. They have never met an artificial sweetener they didn't like. They are not believable on any point in any debate that concerns the financial well being of any of the artificial sweetener manufacturers that pay their bills. In this case, their report of this alleged 'aspartame study' is a bigger fraud than the product itself. Save yourself and save your health quit NutraSweet now," Washington D.C. Attorney, James Turner said.
Turner worked with Dr. John Olney to keep NutraSweet off the market from 1974 to 1981 and is intimately familiar with the scandalous nature of the aspartame approval process and the human misery that has been scientifically-linked to its consumption. He is currently the Chairman of "Citizens for Health and earlier this month petitioned the FDA to ban Splenda. Slated to replace the increasingly unpopular aspartame, Splenda (sucralose) is a chlorocarbon in the same family of chemicals as DDT and Lindane and is known to cause seizures and migraines. "Because Splenda liberates chlorine we call it DDT-Lite," commented Mission Possible founder, Dr. Betty Martini, who wants to know, "When is government going to stop approving industry's attempts to poison the people with toxic artificial sweeteners?"
Though the Lim "study" is merely a mathematical hypothesis taken from data accumulated over a decade ago, a blizzard of media articles are now claiming a "new federal study" on 567,000 Americans by the NIH, NCI and AARP shows aspartame/NutraSweet/Equal doesn't cause cancer. This scientifically specious claim attempts to contradict the aspartame-specific, 36-month, peer-reviewed Ramazzini Study (2005) which demonstrated conclusively that aspartame causes lymphomas, leukemias, peripheral nerve tumors, kidney cancer, malignant brain tumors in rats and is a multipotential carcinogen.
This study, one of the most comprehensive and scientifically-sound food additive studies ever conducted, was meant to simulate a lifetime of aspartame ingestion, the equivalent of 50 to 90+ years of aspartame ingestion in humans. The results indicated that even moderately low levels of aspartame caused these cancers. The scientists attributed this finding to the significant formaldehyde exposure from aspartame ingestion.
The NCI/NIH/AARP survey asked participants to mark from memory their consumption of certain foods going back 12 months and did not inquire of past ingestion or whether the subjects were using any of the some 6,000 commonly-consumed aspartame-containing products available today.
The CCC's jumping to Lim's suggestions also contradict the observations of FDA toxicologist, Dr.Adrian Gross who, under oath more than two decades ago, told Congress, "In view of all these indications the cancer causing potential of aspartame is a matter that had been established way beyond any reasonable doubt, one can ask: 'What is the reason for the apparent refusal by FDA to invoke for this food additive the so-called Delaney Amendment to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act?' Is it not clear beyond any shadow of a doubt that aspartame has caused brain tumors or brain cancer in animals? (Senate S10839 - 10840, 8/1/85).
The Delaney Amendment states that, if a product causes cancer in animals, it can't be put in human food.
At the bottom of its April 4 release, the CCC sends a powerful message indicating its allegiance to industry over individuals by stating, "The Calorie Control Council, established in 1966, is an international non-profit association representing the low-calorie and reduced-fat food and beverage industry. Today it represents 60 manufacturers and suppliers of low-calorie, low-fat and light foods and beverages, including the manufacturers and suppliers of more than a dozen different dietary sweeteners, fat replacers and other low-calorie ingredients. (emphasis added)
The CCC release encourages readers to contact CCC spokesperson Beth Hubrich, MS, RD at 404-252-3663
Following is a collection of quotes and observations by corporate-neutral people who know scientifically and from personal experience that aspartame is a dangerous, neurotoxic and carcinogenic drug:
"The methodology of the NCI study is so flawed that one can really draw no valid conclusions about aspartame and cancer. Clearly the questionnaire was not designed to focus primarily on aspartame. It does not even differentiate between aspartame and other artificial sweeteners, it does not assess aspartame consumption in the many sources other than diet drinks, and looks at any 12 months of sweetener use with "up to 5 years of follow-up." If one looked at 12 months of cigarette smoking with "up to 5 years of follow-up" one would conclude that cigarettes also do not cause cancer." ~Dr. Ralph Walton
Ralph G. Walton, M.D., is Medical Director, Safe Harbor Behavioral Health, Professor of Clinical Psychiatry, Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Adjunct Professor Of Psychiatry, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine. Dr. Walton's study on aspartame:
"Adverse Reactions to Aspartame: Double-Blind Challenge in Patients from a Vulnerable Population:
http://www.mindfully.org/Health/Aspartame-Adverse-Reactions-1993.htm
His research on Scientific Peer Reviewed Studies and Funding: http://www.dorway.com/peerrev.html
"This was no aspartame study! Ten years ago the National Institute of Health and AARP sent out a 16-page 'Diet and Health Study' questionnaire to seniors. It asked if you smoke, do you exercise, do you eat crackers, cookies sausage, collards, what was your highest grade in school, have you had a hysterectomy, did you eat pancakes, oatmeal or strawberries in the past year, carrots, cheeseburgers, cornbread or brownies. Why not call it the Oatmeal Brownie Study?
"Aspartame is named in only one of 56 questions: 'Over the last 12 months when you drank coffee or tea, what kind of sweetener did you regularly add? Mark all that apply.'" (Sugar, honey, Equal, aspartame or saccharin).
"Page 2 asks what you drink: orange juice, lemonade or soft drinks, soda, diet or regular. Doesn't say whether to check diet or regular. On page 12 they ask if you drank any sugar-free soft drinks, soda, or pop, lemonade, Kool-Aide or sweetened iced tea over last 12 months but do not ask which sweetener.
"Calling this survey an aspartame cancer study is intellectual dishonesty. Aspartame is in at least 6,000 foods and drugs and even chewing gum. This exposure wasn't pursued. Now suppose you don't drink coffee or tea or pop, but you chew gum constantly and eat a plethora of 'diet' aspartame-containing foods. They'd tally you as non-user of aspartame although your prescriptions, yogurt, ice cream, cereal, and other foods you may consume are full of it.
"Epidemiology is the study of disease in human populations. For this to be an aspartame/cancer epidemiology study, its authors would be looking for cancer among those exposed to this toxin. So naturally they would ask if you consumed aspartame products. They would want to know how many aspartame-containing products were consumed and for how long. The form would list all the foods, beverages and medicines known to contain aspartame. They would list all of the known tabletop sweeteners by generic name and trade name.
"There would be such questions as if you used aspartame in pregnancy and whether your children have cancer or birth defects. Because aspartame is not labeled on restaurant food, nor is it common to ask if food prepared by others contains aspartame, the frequency with which participants eat out would also be considered in an epidemiological study.
"Though Lim's prospective study does not qualify as epidemiological aspartame study, the aspartame manufacturer's PR groups, led by the CCC, have flooded the media with pronouncements about aspartame safety." ~Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
"The Calorie Control Council and the American Beverage Association, both of which represent beverage companies, hailed the study as further evidence that aspartame is a safe food additive." ~The New York Times, April 8, 2006
"I am appalled by the inference that products containing the chemical aspartame are safe and 'no cause for alarm'...based on the recent extensively reported summary of a National Cancer Institute study. My reaction after viewing the broad-based food consumption survey used for this study is one of disbelief that such a benign inference could be made from the database used. Indeed, this report should be embarrassing to the NCI, the FDA and an indifferent Congress. In my opinion, aspartame should not have been allowed for human consumption in the first place, based on the unequivocal demonstration of a high incidence of brain tumors in rats. Several recent studies by other investigators fully support my assertion." ~Dr. H.J. Roberts
(Dr. Roberts, author of the 1,038-page medical text, "Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic," and world expert who testified before Congress and declared the global plague has his own 9-page survey for persons with suspected reactions to aspartame products which could be used for a real epidemiological study on aspartame. www.sunsentpress.com contains many of his books. Dr. Roberts wrote about aspartame and lymphoma in a peer reviewed journal article 15 years ago: http://www.dorway.com/betty/brainc.txt This is an extremely well documented article on the issue and he made recommendations by saying it required careful analysis by corporate-neutral investigators. The Ramazzini Study did this. He further recommendation was in the event such a correlation was shown and cancer rates continue to rise, the FDA should declare aspartame products an "imminent public health hazard".)
"The National Cancer Institute researchers appeared to have collected no data on people's prior consumption, whether they were regular consumers of beverages with aspartame or whether they recently began consuming them. The duration of exposure to aspartame is inadequate in the study. We know nothing about how long they've been consuming aspartame. One year is practically nothing." ~Dr. Morando Soffritti, as quoted by The New York Times, April 8, 2006
(Dr. Soffritti is the scientific director of the European Ramazzini Foundation and author of the 2005 Italian study mentioned in the text of the article above).
"This is not science and cannot be taken seriously by anyone who cherishes the truth. I would expect to find better uses of statistics at a high school science fair."~Dr. Woodrow Monte
(Dr. Monte authored the scientific, peer reviewed article, "Aspartame: Methanol and the Public Health" (http://www.dorway.com/doctors.html#monte)
"In my own experience, supported by the credible research of world class physicians, aspartame is one of the most dangerous things you can ingest. One doctor describes aspartame disease as a "Worldwide Plague." A survey of the eating habits of over half a million people 10 years ago is being touted as indicating that aspartame is safe. After reviewing the 16 pages of the survey listing all types of foods, I noted only one question asking about sugar free drinks, without mentioning the type sweetener (question 6, page 12), and one question that asked if you drank coffee and tea to mark the sweetener. Aspartame was mentioned once. If someone checked regular drinks and used Fresca or Tab not marked diet, they would still be getting aspartame but not counted as an aspartame consumer. And if they used it prior to the 12 months being questioned or used some of the other 6,000 products not even mentioned on the form, they still would not be considered an aspartame user. To make the conclusion that aspartame is safe based on it being mentioned once is irresponsible and dishonest. Not only will this deception cause millions to die or live with pain and disability but, under Title 18, Section 1001 of U.S. criminal code, it is against the law to deceive the public with full knowledge. This is the law used when the FDA themselves attempted to have the original manufacturer Searle indicted. The defense team hired the U.S. prosecutors! There simply was no way to take a chemical poison and get it to show safety so they were doing such things as excising brain tumors from rats, putting them back in the study, and resurrecting them on paper when they died. A complete investigation is needed to probe the deception." ~Ed Johnson
(Ed Johnson is a Texas attorney and formerly an assistant U.S. attorney and former president and CEO of one of the largest law firms in Texas. An aspartame-induced brain tumor ended his career in law and he is now a natural health and wellness activist. He tells his story on camera in the documentary "Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World" and can be found online at http://www.dorway.com/lawyer1.html.
"If the so-called questionnaire is representative of the kind and quality of the evidence that the aspartame industry will use to support its conclusion that aspartame is safe, then the people of New Mexico have little to be concerned about at the pending hearing to ban aspartame here. A first year law student could easily rebut the conclusions reached in the federal study." ~Stevan D. Looney
(Looney is the New Mexico attorney who has led the legal charge to achieve a statewide ban on aspartame in the state of New Mexico. Reports indicate that New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson favors such a ban).
"The early release of this report represents bad science to say the least and is more consistent with an attempt to shore up a product that has been getting consistently bad reports from independent scientific researchers for the past decade. And these reports have been presented in peer-reviewed reputable journals from laboratories from all over the world. To properly evaluate such studies, as the one recently released, they should appear in peer-reviewed journals with all of the data and methods used in the study. Only then can the study be properly evaluated.
"It is accepted among scientist/clinicians that the poorest type of study you can do is an epidemiological (population) study in which you have a large number of people fill out questionnaires. And of the epidemiological studies the poorest are the ones depending on participants' memory of intake of the product in question. This study falls in this category. In fact, these studies are so poor they have been used for over 60 years to cover up pharmaceutical disasters. For example, despite an enormous amount of evidence that the polio vaccine was contaminated with a cancer-causing virus (SV-40) the government was able to cover up this disaster by conducting similar epidemiological studies.
"This has been repeated for the thimerosal (mercury) -autism disaster, the MSG toxicity scandal and the trans-fatty acid scandal-all of which were carefully covered up by such studies, until so much evidence eventually accumulated that the truth won out.
"One reason 567,000 people were used is that you can dilute out high cancer rates in sub-groups of people-such as women, children or those with certain genetic weaknesses. This has been shown numerous times in similar studies. It also impresses the public. You cannot accurately obtain dietary information from 567,000 people. Likewise, you cannot adequately determine cancer risk in a population with an age range so small (age 50 to 69). The greatest risk of leukemia and lymphoma would be in a younger population (small children and teenagers) and they would need to be exposed regularly from early in life. The same is true for the rest of the population. Yet, they did not determine aspartame intake prior to the start of the study age. This is ludicrous.
"We also know from animal studies that the greatest risk is in females and that most of the brain tumors being reported are occurring in women (a known characteristic of formaldehyde-a recognized breakdown product of aspartame). Aspartame has been shown by carefully done, irrefutable studies, to cause damage to DNA and present harm to pregnant women and their babies.
"Aspartame is not an essential nutrient. I would not risk my life or the lives of those I love, especially my children, on the basis of such a poorly conducted and reported study. There is just too much evidence that this sweetener is dangerous to babies, children, adults and the elderly. And much of the damage, especially to children is irreversible." ~Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, MD (Dr. Blaylock is a world renowned neurosurgeon and author of Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, Health & Nutrition Secrets To Save Your Life and Cancer Strategies.
He can be seen in the aspartame documentary, Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World, He has a monthly newsletter on Newsmax.com: The Blaylock Wellness Report )
On autism:
http://www.dorway.com/blayautism.txt
On brain problems:
http://www.dorway.com/blayart1.txt
Excitotoxins, Neurodegeneration and Neurodevelopment:
http://www.dorway.com/blayenn.html
Miami Herald Letter, Exposing Calorie Control Council, front group:
http://www.wnho.net/mh_aspartame_letter.htm
Dr. Blaylock also commented on the 2005 study conducted by Dr. Soffritti: "This study confirmed the previous study by Dr. Trocho and co-workers (1998), which also found the formaldehyde breakdown product of aspartame to be damaging to cellular DNA and that this damage was cumulative. The type of damage was a duplicate of that associated with cancers. These two studies strongly indicate that drinking a single diet cola sweetened with aspartame every day could significantly increase one's risk of developing a lymphoma or leukemia. This study should terrify mothers and all those consuming aspartame-sweetened products. This was a carefully done study which clearly demonstrated a statistically significant increase in several types of lymphomas and leukemias in rats. Both of these malignancies have increased significantly in this country since the widespread use of aspartame."
"If this is what they're throwing at us in defense of aspartame we've already won. It's not even a comparison of apples to oranges-at least they're both fruit. Lim's team took unrelated, incomplete, non-scientific, decade-old data, derived from the memories of elderly people, to develop a mathematical equation to suggest that aspartame is not linked to the formation of two types of cancer. It is hard to say what is most shameful: That there are people who would intentionally mislead the public with bad science to promote the continued consumption of a known poison or that people would be fooled by bad science and continue poisoning themselves." ~Don Harkins
(Harkins is the editor of The Idaho Observer newspaper and The Artificially-Sweetened Times. The Idaho Observer will be publishing a booklet with letters from world experts on aspartame. The purpose of this edition is to provide parents, teachers and physicians with all the information they need to demand that foods and beverages containing aspartame be banned from the nation's schools as a known cause of birth defects, mental retardation, and other chronic and irreversible types of damage. The "parent's edition" is scheduled to be available by the end of April, 2006).
"The so-called science behind this article totally ignores the initial toxicity tests which were done at only 1/1000 of the legally-required test dosage. Those tests showed that even a minute dose of aspartame caused a higher incidence of brain cancer in rats than any other chemical tested at that dose. In the first 6 months after aspartame's introduction into the marketplace, the brain tumor rate in America jumped 10 percent and incidence of diabetes jumped 30 percent." ~James Bowen, MD
(Dr. Bowen, who has Lou Gehrig's disease from aspartame, wrote the FDA: "...the only responsible action would be to immediately take aspartame off the market, fully disclose its toxicities, offer full compensation to the injured, public and criminally prosecute anyone who participated in the fraudulent placement of aspartame on the marketplace. That includes all those who work so diligently to keep it on the market as well.")
Note: It is no wonder that the CCC, et al, are grasping at nonscientific straws in an attempt to defend the dubious honor of aspartame: The marketplace is getting wise to the horrors of aspartame. Europe's biggest aspartame producer, Holland Sweetener Co., announced March 30, 2006, it's been losing money and will cease production by the end of 2006. Chicago-based aspartame producer Merisant recently reported that its 2005 North American sales figures are down 22 percent from 2004.
Robin Goodwin, Mission Possible Falklands, petitioned for a ban of aspartame there and wrote all 3,000 citizens warning them. His wife suffered an aspartame brain tumor and his daughter had seizures for 18 years, which ceased when she abstained. In early April, 2006, he told me aspartame-containing products have been sitting on Falkland store shelves for six months.
Roger Williams, Member of Parliament has called for a ban in the UK and Stephen Fox has petitioned the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board, and the state's Board of Pharmacy. New Mexico state Senator Gerald Ortiz y Pino sponsored the bill to ban aspartame which didn't make it in the 30-day session but we expect to see it again. The valiant fight of New Mexico led by Stephen Fox is a model for citizens worldwide. Ten New Mexico state senators signed a letter asking Governor Bill Richardson to declare New Mexico in a state of public emergency and ban the toxin which violates state and federal adulteration statues, and therefore interstate commerce laws. Dr. H. J. Roberts met recently with Governor Richardson who assured him aspartame does need to be banned and he is in full agreement.
Senator Ortiz y Pino said in an article he wrote in February: "It's only a matter of time until even Ajinomoto's money won't be able to block the unavoidable link between these unnecessary products and our decline in health. .. When that happens, as it finally did to tobacco and lead and other heavy metals found in gasoline, we will act. The sad thing is that thousands of deaths and ruined lives will occur between now and then." "One of the cruel ironies to aspartame is that it was supposed to create sugar-free soft drinks for the benefit of diabetics. Since its introduction, the incidence of diabetes has soared. Some critics link the two. .....With all the money and muscle behind it, aspartame has evaded its comeuppance for another year. But the final reckoning can only be postponed, not avoided."
Ajinomoto is the Japanese aspartame producer financing the fight to prevent an aspartame ban in New Mexico.
A host of independent studies have exposed not only aspartame related cancer but the many horrors listed in medical texts by experts like Doctors H. J. Roberts and Russell Blaylock. A recent study from Greece shows aspartame causes memory loss and neurological problems. Concentrations of aspartame influence acetylcholine metabolism, important relative to brain function with profound implications concerning Alzheimer's disease.
A study in December on combining food additives including aspartame was damning. The Liverpool team reported that when mouse nerve cells were exposed to MSG and brilliant blue or aspartame and quinoline yellow in laboratory conditions, combined in concentrations that theoretically reflect the compound that enters the bloodstream after a typical children's snack and drink, the additives stopped the nerve cells growing and interfered with proper signaling systems.
A generation of children have been damaged by aspartame because aspartame triggers ADD, ADHD, and autism and interacts with drugs and vaccines. Dr. Blaylock said "Since aspartame can increase obesity and may even cause the metabolic syndrome that affects 48 million Americans, there is no reason to ever consume this product. At the least, it should be immediately banned from all schools."
We thank Governor Richardson for getting it out of grammar and middle schools and now we need it to be removed from high schools in New Mexico.
ASPARTAME AND SEX:
Dr. Kenneth Stoller, President of the International Hyperbaric Medical Assoc., Medical Director of HMCNM & HOCS, and listed as an Aspartame Detox Center in New Mexico also spoke out: "Epidemiology studies have very significant drawbacks that most scientists do not realize. The ultimate example of same is that it is impossible to prove that sex causes pregnancy with an epidemiology study."
It should also be noted, while sex is being mentioned, that aspartame destroys complete families. As Dr. James Bowen wrote in "Aspartame Murders Infants," "At every point in the fertility process aspartame destroys, beginning with the gleam in Mom and Pop's eyes: It ruins female sexual response and induces male sexual dysfunction. Beyond this, aspartame may have heinously damaged the DNA of the baby, cursing future generations."
"Using dishonest studies to deceive the world displays the heinous malevolence of the greedy conscienceless people using a broad based food consumption survey to trick the world into thinking a deadly excitoneurotoxic carcinogen drug doesn't cause cancer and is safe. They have deceived consumers worldwide and consumers should be outraged," Martini concluded.
Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum, Founder
Mission Possible International
9270 River Club Parkway
Duluth, Georgia 30097
770 242-2599
www.wnho.net and www.dorway.com
Aspartame Toxicity Center, www.holisticmed.com/aspartame
FDA said aspartame caused cancer over two decades ago:
http://www.wnho.net/cancer_study_obligates_recall.htm
Aspartame manufacturers been telling whoppers for years:
Flacks write absurd editorials:
http://www.wnho.net/letter_abq_journal.htm
Associated Press Article:
http://cbs2.com/health/health_story_094155327.html
PDF - Impeccable 3 year Italian Study:
http://www.wnho.net/aspartame_study_14july2005.pdf
The Shocking Story of the World's Best Selling Sweetener:
http://www.wnho.net/articles-ecologist.htm
Aspartame documentary: Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World,
www.amazon.com or Barnes & Noble.
How Don Rumsfeld called in his markers and got it approved when the FDA said NO:
http://www.soundandfury.tv/pages/Rumsfeld2.html
Here is a promo to the film:
http://www.mercola.com/forms/sweet_misery.htm
Medical text on global plague: Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic,
www.sunsentpress.com by H. J. Roberts, M.D. 1038 pages of
horrors including cancer triggered by aspartame
Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills by neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D.
www.russellblaylockmd.com
Aspartame Causes Blood Disorders:
http://www.rense.com/general70/aasp.htm
Idaho Observer publishes 24 page booklets for
distribution: Artificially Sweetened Times, soon to publish booklets
for schools, OB-GYN, and Pediatricians with letters from world
experts on aspartame. www.idaho-observer.com
New Federal Aspartame Study Is Cockamamie Claptrap written before
receiving form used:
http://www.wnho.net/federal_aspartame_study_claptrap.htm
Calorie Control Council Release:
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/04-04-2006/0004332859&EDATE=
Aspartame Ban – Will NM A.G. Stand Up To Protect Citizens?
Editorial from Gershon Siegel
Publisher, Monthly Sun
permpress@aol.com
12-31-5
http://www.rense.com/general69/protecdt.htm
Real consumer protection is not about the easiest path. Corporate interests
need to be held in check and admonished and rebuked when it is necessary - not
after the fact in huge lawsuits for damages like we just saw resolved in the
Vioxx case in Texas.
Over the years the Sun has examined the medical and legal implications of the
artificial sweetener aspartame. For New Mexico, a critical crossroads is
approaching in the very near future, not concerning aspartame as a potential
neurotoxin, but rather questioning whether or not the state of New Mexico,
through its Board of Pharmacy, Environmental Improvement Board and Board of
Education, has the right even to investigate such a potential.
This legal-authority question has been asked of the attorney general, Patricia
Madrid, whose office is presently preparing a formal opinion as to whether our
state's boards can legitimately challenge a Food and Drug Administration
approved product like aspartame. The FDA's approval was flawed, if not
corrupt, to begin with, as was made clear in the September 2005 Sun article
"Rumsfeld's Disease." Therefore it seems incomprehensible that such a faulty
FDA approval could not be questioned by a state board having heard a
significant amount of evidence thus far.
But this is just what corporate lawyers representing the Japanese firm
Ajinomoto, the world's largest aspartame manufacturer, would like the boards
and the attorney general to believe. Ajinomoto is joined in this legal effort
by an industry front group, the Calorie Control Council. They have both hired
high-powered lawyers to silence the boards on the grounds that aspartame is
"safe" and that, besides, no one but the FDA, Congress and the federal courts
can challenge any of the FDA's approval processes, at least until someone dies
from an FDA-approved product.
In spite of the industry front group's innocent-sounding name, and given
previous and most recent scientific studies indicating the harmful affects of
aspartame, we take exception to Ajinomoto's assertion of aspartame safety.
Coincidently, Ajinomoto also happens to be the world's largest manufacturer of
another dubious food additive, monosodium glutamate. We encourage the attorney
general to issue a strong opinion supporting the boards looking into aspartame
in children's medicines and in thousands of food products.
Neurodegenerative diseases are on the upsurge, especially in children and in
the elderly, and no corporate interest can silence or thwart the ongoing quest
for medical truth. Protecting our children lies at the very core of our
existence, and most certainly the attorney general knows this. We'd like
Madrid to recognize the obvious: that in 1981 the FDA's approval was
politically motivated and that these corporate interests have stymied the real
truth about aspartame for the last 24 years through the evolution of "diet"
beverages, "sugarless" gum, "low fat" yogurt and other pleasant delusions
whose net effect has been shown to cause neurodegenerative mayhem in the human
physiology. It is time to put an end to this destructive mythology and
corporate deception.
Attorney General Madrid could roll over and capitulate to the corporate
interests, as if it were the FDA itself that is making the preemption
arguments, which is not the case. From a bureaucratic point of view, this
might be the easiest thing to do. However, real consumer protection is not
about the easiest path. Corporate interests need to be held in check and
admonished and rebuked when it is necessary - not after the fact in huge
lawsuits for damages like we just saw resolved in the Vioxx case in Texas. As
part of the attorney general's statutory duties and powers, it is her job to
protect New Mexicans from further neurotoxic exposure. Therefore, we strongly
encourage Madrid to say no to the corporate clamor insisting that the Board of
Pharmacy and the Environmental Improvement Board remain silent on this issue,
and instead affirm their right to move forward with aspartame hearings.
In the past, when local laws have threatened corporate bottom lines, big
business has hauled out the Constitution's supremacy and commerce clauses to
support their profits-over-people argument. This tact has usually proved
successful. However, let us not forget the tobacco suits of the 1990s, which
stunningly affirmed, in effect, that those corporations that knowingly sell
products potentially harmful to the public risk paying billions in reparations
to those states that take seriously the obligation of protecting the health
and safety of their citizens.
The aspartame industry represents billions of dollars annually, and we
understand the courage needed by the attorney general to stand tall at this
critical juncture for the health and safety of the people of New Mexico. As
with the aforementioned tobacco suits, her decision may potentially affect the
actions of other attorneys general throughout the country and, therefore,
affect millions of Americans and even more millions of consumers worldwide.
However, for Madrid to now surrender to the industry's legal saber rattling
will be nothing less than a complete abnegation of the powers of her office
and a further descent into the growing corporate control of all government
processes.
To voice your input regarding this matter of consumer protection to the
attorney general's office, call 827-6000 and ask to speak to Patricia Madrid's
personal assistant.
The Right To Rid New Mexico Of Neurotoxic Aspartame
By Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
Bettym19@mindspring.com
12-18-5
http://www.rense.com/general69/neuro.htm
To the Honorable Patricia Madrid and Stuart Bluestone:
It's an open and shut case: New Mexico's Legislature has vested the EIB with the authority and duty to hold a rule-making hearing on aspartame, as petitioned by Stephen Fox. Atty. Stevan Looney explained the hearing is not pre-empted by federal law nor by the Supremacy or Commerce Clauses of the U.S. Constitution, and provided the evidence to back this up. What good is an Environmental Improvement Board be if it can't prevent New Mexicans from being poisoned?
Many authorities that have attempted to protect the public from aspartame poisoning, only to be thwarted by intimidation, politics and bribes. They had every right and power to put a stop to what Dr. James Bowen told FDA is the mass poisoning of the America and 100 countries of the world. Your EIB and New Mexico can finally provide a precedent for the world to follow by insisting on due process.
On December 16, a British Member of Parliament called for a ban of aspartame in the UK:
http://www.wnho.net/mp_calls_ban_on_aspartame.htm
The Public Health Minister who should have done her homework instead defended industry. But critical mass has been reached and many other campaigns have been initiated to eliminate aspartame.
http://www.wnho.net/to_caroline_flint_phm.htm
In the beginning when Searle, the original manufacturer, was applying for aspartame approval, FDA asked the Department of Justice to prosecute them for fraud. Both U.S. prosecutors, Skinner and Conlon hired on with the defense attorneys and the statute of limitations expired. Bribery is the act or practice of giving or taking money or other payment to influence judgment or action. This a bribe. Searle paid off the prosecutors by getting them fat jobs. Came next the political rewards: Sam Skinner was soon Secretary of Transportation, squelching cries of the pilots having grand mal seizures in commercial airliners from this seizure triggering chemical, which ruined the careers of many pilots.
See the Bressler Report, an official FDA audit:
http://www.dorway.com/bressler.txt
Searle excised brain tumors from the rats and continued with them in the study and when they died resurrected them on paper. They just filtered out what they wanted to hide from FDA. Jerome Bressler told me it was worse than the egregious errors his report exposed because FDA deleted the worst 20%. He confirmed this to Doctors H. J. Roberts and Russell Blaylock. Dr. Roberts asked his congressman to request the deleted material but FDA refused. Altering reports is FRAUD BY FDA ITSELF!
At every turn there were shenanigans. Ajinomoto, an aspartame manufacturer claims: "When questions were raised about the Searle's studies, FDA had an outside group of pathologists review crucial aspartame studies. GAO found that throughout aspartame's approval history, the FDA addressed safety issues raised internally and by outside scientists and by concerned citizens."
Dr. H. J. Roberts in his books on aspartame gives the facts about this so-called "outside" pathologists.
The manufacturer used Universities Associated for Research and Education in Pathology. UAREP was hired to determine the accuracy of Searle's aspartame studies - but with the stipulation that UAREP "shall not express an opinion regarding either the design or safety significance of these studies, nor make recommendations about the safety of aspartame for human use!"
.
Searle convinced FDA to let them bribe UAREP $500,000 to "validate" twelve studies. (Gordon l987 page 498 of US Senate l987). Half a million to zip the lip!
Dr. Adrian Gross, an FDA toxicologist, challenged UAREP for obvious reasons. They couldn't prove the chemical poison is safe. The late FDA toxicologist, Dr. Jacqueline Verrett, also a member of the Task Force that investigated Searle's research, said their studies were "built on a foundation of sand". (Testimony of Dr. Jacqueline Verrett, FDA Toxicologist, before the U.S. Senate committee on Labor and Human Resources, regarding "NutraSweet Health and Safety Concerns," 11/3/'87). She testified Searle's tests were a "disaster" and should have been "thrown out".
Aspartame was never proven safe. FDA toxicologist and Task Force member, Dr. Adrian Gross summed it up (Wilson l985): "They lied and they didn't submit the real nature of their observations because had they done that it is more than likely that a great number of these studies would have been rejected simply for adequacy. What Searle did, they took great pains to camouflage these shortcomings of the study. As I say filter and just present to the FDA what they wished the FDA to know and they did other terrible things for instance animals would develop tumors while they were under study. Well they would remove these tumors from the animals."
This is the "science" that approved aspartame. The Government Accounting Office examined FDA's approval process and concluded it acted properly, but the first page of GAO's report announced: "We did not evaluate the scientific issues raised concerning the studies used for aspartame's approval or FDA's resolution of these issues, nor did we determine aspartame's safety. We do not have such scientific expertise." Wearing horse blinders GAO checked if FDA did the paperwork right, never mind how many it kills. The manufacturers never tell the whole story. They filter out the truth. It's like asking the Mafia for a crime report.
For 16 years FDA had steadfastly refused to allow aspartame on the market. But Searle had built a $19,000,000 NutraSweet factory and had $9 million worth of inventory. So political heavyweight Don Rumsfeld was hired to run the company and fix things. He called in his markers and Presto!, he was Secretary of Defense and aspartame was approved, safe or not. Washington attorney James Turner explains how Rummy did this in the face of FDA refusal in the aspartame documentary - Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World,
View the clip where Turner tells how the deed was done:
http://www.soundandfury.tv/pages/Rumsfeld2.html
Like your EIB, FDA has the responsibility to deny poisons. But Searle's political clout kept FDA from doing its job. The day after he took office President Reagan appointed a new FDA Commissioner to approve aspartame and wrote an EXECUTIVE ORDER making the outgoing Commissioner powerless to do anything about aspartame. This is as outrageous as paying half a million dollars for shutmouth.
The manufacturers should be criminally prosecuted for genocide. Dr. James Bowen explains how aspartame fits the Federal Domestic genocide law, Title 18:
http://www.wnho.net/aspartame_murders_infants.htm
The documentary relates how famed Dr. John Olney, who opposed approval, demanded that Searle redo studies in his lab so he could be sure they were done correctly. They showed brain damage, but Searle never gave the studies to the FDA. Searle knew from the start that aspartame triggered brain tumors and could care less. In their secret trade information released during congressional hearings is this paragraph:
"With the spoon-for-spoon, we have no way of estimating maximum likely abuse and hence need to utilize data based on almost complete conversion to DKP. If we include this use in the original FAP, we stand a good chance of ending up with nothing in the short run and nothing in the long run whereas the other approach would give us something in the short run and quite likely as much as we would ever get in the long run."
DKP is a brain tumor agent. Searle here acknowledge that telling the truth will kill the approval. In l983/84 before Searle sold to Monsanto they actually had 6 studies done in central and south America. They "sacrificed" people in poor villages. These studies showed aspartame destroys the brain and central nervous system and hardens the synovial fluids. Subjects in these 18-month studies developed seizures and brain tumors, some died. A pregnant woman lost her baby, hemorrhaged and disappeared. It's criminal not to publish these damning studies but they didn't.
I have the affidavit of the translator.
In July, the Cancer Research Center of the European Foundation of Oncology and Environmental Sciences in Italy reported their 3-year study on carcinogenicty. Like the victims in South America, the rats fed aspartame developed malignant brain tumors. They also had lymphoma, leukemia, cancer of the kidneys and cranial peripheral nerves. In September they described aspartame as a multipotential carcinogen.
FDA toxicologist, the late Dr. Adrian Gross, told Congress aspartame "without a shadow of a doubt" can cause brain tumors and brain cancer and violates the Delaney Amendment which forbids putting anything in food you know will cause cancer. He said because of this the FDA should not even set an allowable daily dose. His last words to congress were: "If the FDA violates its own laws who is left to protect the public."
The problem is the manufacturers lie constantly. Aspartame Makers Tell A Whopper:
http://www.wnho.net/whopper.htm
The manufacturers of aspartame are pros at influencing those who oppose them. The National Soft Drink Association wrote a 30 page protest against approving aspartame for soda pop. Section 402 of the FDA Act 21 provides a food is adulterated if it contains, in whole or in part "a decomposed substance or if it is otherwise unfit for food". They knew it violated federal adulteration statues and yet they turned around and put aspartame in their slop anyway. Read their protest to the Congressional Record of 5/7/85 Senate page S 5509.
NSDA objected: "Searle has not demonstrated to a reasonable certainty that aspartame and its degradation products are safe for use in soft drinks. ... Aspartame is inherently markedly and uniquely unstable in aqueous media. In a liquid such as a soft drink aspartame will degrade as a function of temperature and pH." Therefore, it violates New Mexico adulteration statutes as well.
The manufacturers of aspartame are pros at manipulating studies not to get the right result. NSDA said inferior test methods were used by Searle. "High pressure liquid chromatography is a far superior analytical method relative to thin layer chromatography and numerous HPLC methods exist for the detection and quantification of amino acids. Searle's choice of TLC over HPLC adversely affected the quality and type of analytical data generated on aspartame and its decomposition products in soft drinks." S5507 ... "an important decomposition product of aspartame, aspartic acid cannot be detected at all using TLC." S 5508
The Trocho Study in l998 in Barcelona showed formaldehyde converted from the methyl alcohol in aspartame accumulates in the cells and damages DNA with most toxicity in the liver, but substantial amounts in the brain, retina, kidneys and adipose tissue (fat cells). The symptoms of Desert Storm Illness are identical to the FDA report of 92 symptoms. Pallets of diet pop laced with aspartame sat in the 120 degree Arabian sun for as long as 8 weeks at a time and the troops drank these formaldehyde cocktails all day long. Also aspartame interacts with vaccines and other toxins. The troops didn't have a chance. The Trocho is an independent scientific peer reviewed study. Naturally they were threatened and intimidated for this damning research.
What breed are those who intentionally murder other human beings? How low can you sink beneath the sewer? People are dropping dead from aspartame. Read neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D,'s report:
http://www.rense.com/general67/alert.htm
In l985 Senator Howard Metzenbaum wrote a bill to put a moratorium on aspartame and have NIH do studies on the problems in the population: seizures, fetal damage, behavioral problems, especially in children, and even drug interaction.
http://www.wnho.net/aspartame_interacts.htm
There were three congressional hearings with scientists & physicians confirming aspartame toxicity, but nothing has ever been done.
UPI, in an 8-month investigation told how the manufacturer got their opponents on a yacht to attempt to change their mind.
http://www.dorway.com/upipart1.html
When Dr. Richard Wurtman of MIT wanted to do studies on aspartame and seizures he was threatened by the VP of Searle that research funds would be rejected. Wurtman didn't deny Searle's threat. Life Sciences or ILSE is a front group for research funds funded by aspartame manufacturers and companies like Coke. Indeed his research funds were rejected, so today Dr. Wurtman no longer speaks against aspartame and MIT gets the money! But Wurtman left a wide paper trail and his incredible Congressional testimony against them and his book, Dietary Phenylalanine and Brain Function: detailing how aspartame destroys your brain. It has been withdrawn from MIT. I have the volume.
Why did Dr. John Olney try to prevent approval of aspartame? Because his studies on aspartic acid, 40% of the aspartame molecule, revealed it causes lesions in the brains of mice. Olney founded the field of neuroscience called excitotoxicity. Aspartic acid overstimulates the neurons of the brain, to death, bringing enormous neurological damage, as Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, MD explained in his medical text, Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills,
http://www.russellblaylockmd.com/
Dr. Olney wrote a report to the Board of Inquiry on the damage aspartame would do to the brains of our children, especially in combination with MSG, with which aspartame. has an additive and synergistic effect.
http://www.truthinlabeling.org/
FDA actually agreed with Dr. Olney. Now that aspartame has been on the market for two decades his prophecy is fulfilled. Parents Magazine in l999 wrote the article "What's Happening To Our Children", that almost every family has been affected and the abnormal is now normal. By high school one of four have contemplated suicide Aspartame triggers ADD, ADHD, Tourettes, mental retardation, autism, etc. Dr. Louis Elsas, Professor of Pediatrics, Genetics, also testified before Congress. The 50% phenylalanine in aspartame floods the brain because as an isolate its neurotoxic. It lowers the seizure threshold and depletes serotonin, which can trigger manic depression or bipolar, mood swings, suicidal tendencies, paranoia, etc. It triggers psychiatric and behavioral problems, interacts with all antidepressants and psychotropic drugs. Aspartame is a psycho drug!
In his first press conference, Dr. H. J. Roberts said unless something was done then in 5 or 10 years we would have a global plague on our hands. We do and Dr. Roberts not only foretold it but published the 1038 page medical text, Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic,
Dr. Roberts is a diabetic specialist who was named "The Best Doctor in the United States" By Practice 84, a medical journal
Aspartame manufacturers with their bottomless checkbooks fund professional girls like the American Diabetes Assn, American Dietetics Assn, the MS people, etc. who have long ago sold their souls to the Devil! Responsible to solve the problem, THEY ARE the problem. With the choice of gold or lifesaving they play the harlot and push the producer's propaganda. Despicable front groups like the Calorie Control Council sink so low as to recommend this poison to pregnant women who may lose their babies or birth impaired infants.
http://www.wnho.net/mh_aspartame_letter.htm
Honorable Patricia Madrid, you must save New Mexico from this gruesome plague.
It's all fact! Stop these monsters who are destroying our children and sowing sickness and death planetwide. May New Mexico set a precedent for the world, and may history enshrine your courage with gratitude and splendor!
Respectfully,
Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
Founder, Mission Possible Intl
9270 River Club Parkway
Duluth, Georgia 30097 770 242-2599
Aspartame Toxicity Center
http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame
Other reports you may wish to read: Ajinomoto, Aspartame and Brain Tumors: Recipe for Death:
http://www.wnho.net/recipe_for_death.htm
Two New Studies on Aspartame:
http://www.wnho.net/new_aspartame_studies.htm
Testimony Before Congress by Louis Elsas, M.D., <
http://www.wnho.net/nutrasweet_testimony.htm
Open Letter to the Albuquerque Journal and New Mexicans:
http://www.wnho.net/letter_abq_journal.htm
Congressional Record, Dr. Richard Wurtman
http://www.wnho.net/congressionalrecord.htm
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
NM Takes Steps To Ban Aspartame In Schools
VRP Staff
11-14-5
http://www.rense.com/general68/nm.htm
As VRP reported in the October 2005 VR News President's Desk, the people of New Mexico spearheaded a movement to try to ban the sale and distribution of aspartame-containing foods in New Mexico. Stephen Fox's New Mexico Nutrition Council and the people of his state won a substantial victory when the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board (EIB) agreed to hear the aspartame rule change proposal, which would ban its sale in that state. The Board voted 4-2 to convene five days of hearings in July.
After Governor Bill Richardson commented last week that he supports the EIB's decision, Stephen Fox's New Mexico Nutrition Council asked both him and Attorney General Patricia Madrid to issue a kind of Executive Order to remove aspartame products in the New Mexico schools, far in advance of the EIB hearings, based on the extensive medical evidence to warrant removing it from children's consumption. Neither the governor nor the attorney general has yet replied to Mr. Fox's request.
On November 14-15, Mr. Fox and several physicians, led by Dr. Ken Stoller M.D., pediatrician, founder of the New Mexico Hyperbaric Chamber, and Assistant Professor of Pediatrics at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine, will present a similar petition to the New Mexico Board of Pharmacy, to request a ruling to prohibit two neurotoxic additions to pharmaceutical preparations consumed in New Mexico. Fox and the physicians are asking the Board of Pharmacy to ban aspartame in hundreds of children's medications as well as children's vitamins. In addition, they are calling for a ban on Thimerosal, the mercury preservative found in vaccinations. New Mexico statutes delegate precise powers to the Pharmacy Board giving it authority to ban poisonous and deleterious additives to pharmaceutical preparations even when there is prior FDA approval of those same additives.
Some New Mexicans have been diagnosed with neurodegenerative afflictions that disappeared when they stopped consuming aspartame. In fact, 80 percent of the complaints the FDA receives are on aspartame. Due to its metabolized byproduct, formaldehyde, aspartame is a toxic substance that has caused brain lesions, seizures, tumors and death in mice.
A safe alternative for individuals who want to avoid aspartame is xylitol, a natural, low-calorie, low-glycemic sweetener that also plays a role in supporting oral health.
For more information on aspartame go to www.dorway.com and www.wnho.net Join the Aspartame Information List on www.wnho.net
Dr. Betty Martini, Founder, Mission Possible International, 9270 River Club Parkway, Duluth, Georgia 30097 770 242-2599
Aspartame Update
The Ecologist
November 2005 Edition
11-5-5
http://www.rense.com/general68/aspa.htm
Since the publication of our Aspartame cover story (September 2005) we have been inundated with letters and emails from people wishing to congratulate us on our tough stand on this toxic food additive.
We have been given a great deal of support and enough additional information for three more features by Betty Martini, long time anti-aspartame campaigner and founder of Mission Possible International (www.dorway.com ). We have also been keeping a keen eye on events in New Mexico where activist Stephen Fox has been petitioning the State to act on long existing statutes that provide for the removal of adulterated food substances from sale within the state, thus allowing New Mexico to provide a higher degree of consumer protection than is being offered at federal level.
Early in October New Mexico's Environmental Improvement Board met and heard arguments for and against the proposed ban. In spite of industry lawyers' attempts to convince the Board that they had no legal right to enact such a ban, it was decided that New Mexico in fact did.
When New Mexico's Gov. Bill Richardson was asked after the hearing if he considered aspartame harmful, he answered, "Yes, from what I've learned." Gov. Richardson, of course, has the power to order the removal of all aspartame-containing products from sale in New Mexico. As it stands a further 5-day hearing has been scheduled for July 2006 that will hopefully resolve the issue.
In cases like this the legal hurdles are often more difficult to negotiate than the medical evidence. Stephen Fox (stephen@santafefineart.com) and attorney Stevan Douglas Looney are to be congratulated for their dogged determination in this respect and we look forward to the party in New Mexico next summer.
In the UK opportunities to pre-empt decisions taken at UK government and EU level can be difficult to find. However, as a start, we would like to see parents and patients pressing local education authorities, hospitals and Trusts to stand up to the Food Standards Agency, the EU's Scientific Committee on Foods and refuse to stock aspartame-containing products.
Finally readers may be interested to know that we are currently in discussion with Tate & Lyle's lawyers who tell us that their clients took exception to our article Sucralose: Life After Aspartame. Watch this space for developments.
end of article:
For more information on aspartame and New Mexico go to www.wnho.net .
Dr. Betty Martini, Founder, Mission Possible International, 9270 River Club Parkway, Duluth, Georgia 30097 770 242-2599 www.wnho.net and www.dorway.com Aspartame Toxicity Center, www.holisticmed.com/aspartame
Aspartame Documentary: Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World, www.docworkers.com In the UK, Namaste Publishing, info@namastepublishing.co.uk
Aspartame Makers In A Tizzy
By Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
Sunday, October 30, 2005
In July. famous Italian scientists made world news by reporting an impeccable three-year study on aspartame proving it causes malignant brain tumors, lymphoma, and leukemia. In Sept they added kidney cancer and cancer of the cranial peripheral nerves. Next the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board granted Stephen Fox's request to convene a five day hearing to consider banning this poison from the state. The full week hearing is scheduled for July.
The folks at Merisant have cranked up the smoke machine to convince us the Italian doctors are morons, though congressional testimony, scientific studies and scores of renowned MD's have said the same thing for years. An anonymous editorial that reads
like an ad appeared in the Albuquerque Journal; next the Santa Fe New Mexican ran a letter from Paul Block, Merisant CEO, with the absurd title ASPARTAME SAFE.
Block tells us: "there is simply no question aspartame is safe...200 studies over 30 years, etc., etc., etc." Rejoice that an unbiased, impartial authority, with no prejudice, absolutely neutral, servant of enlightenment, purity and truth recommends a neurotoxin he stands to cop an extra ten million from. In September Merisant bonused Block with four percent of the first $100 million, 5% of the next and 6% thereafter. Plus his regular pay, of course, and the limousine, and the airplane, and, and, and ...
Surely no one would think such meager monetary considerations color Block's allegiance to truth. He just drank too much diet pop and it blew his memory, #9 on the FDA list of 92 symptoms from 10,000 aspartame complaints. Block forgot the 17 page expose in September's Ecologist, and many renowned doctors raising outcry, publishing books, magazine and Internet articles, and by radio warning America of this dread and growing disaster. Block can't recall that once FDA asked the Justice Department to investigate the manufacturer for filing fraudulent reports to get it approved. Caught dead to rights, their defense lawyers hired the prosecutors and the case died with the statute of limitations. The Godfather hired the district attorney!
This wasn't the first time. A parade of FDA officials, Commissioners included, have hired
into the aspartame business. Every test endorsing it was paid for by the manufacturer. All independent studies say its toxic. The Italian researchers declared it's a Multi-Potential Carcinogen. Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D., author of Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills says: "This study should terrify mothers and all those consuming aspartame sweetened products. This was a carefully done study which clearly demonstrated a statistically significant increase in several types of lymphomas and leukemias in rats. Both of these malignancies have increased significantly in this country since the widespread use of aspartame." FDA has received more complaints on aspartame than all other food additives combined, so they stopped taking complaints.
Aspartame makers are honorable men, all honorable men! So they put little blue paks of rat poison on restaurant tables worldwide, and the cursed stuff triggers diabetes, destroys the mind, eradicates sexual function, destroys sight and makes you fat! A test on 7 monkeys gave 5 grand mal seizures and killed number six. We're the monkeys now!
At every point in the fertility process aspartame destroys, beginning with the gleam in Mom and Pop's eyes. "It destroys female sexual response and induces male dysfunction," says James Bowen, M.D., "Beyond this, aspartame disrupts fetal development by aborting it or inducing defects. And if a live child is born aspartame may have heinously damaged the DNA of the baby, cursing future generations. The schools are filled with children with ADD, ADHD and behavioral problems triggered by this neurotoxin." The next phase in New Mexico's battle to free itself from aspartame begins with the N.M. Board of Pharmacy's consideration of a complete ban from children's vitamins and medications in Albuquerque on November 14 & 15. Co-petitioner with Stephen Fox (505 983 2002) is Ken Stoller, M.D., Pediatrics and Associate Professor of Pediatrics at UNM School of Medicine (505 - 820-6234).
Aspartame propaganda is tired and worn out. All shenanigans are a matter of public record. You can read the FDA audit, Bressler Report, damning Center for Disease Control investigation and protest of National Soft Drink Association on www.dorway.com To Paul Block: Everybody's sick of the denials after a quarter century of controversy, sickness, ruination and death. The world has had enough. You don't have to lose your bonus, Paul, just change the label to read rat poison. The world already knows it's a killer.
Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum, Founder, Mission Possible Intl, 9270 River Club Parkway, Duluth, Georgia 30097 770 242-2599 www.wnho.net and www.dorway.com Aspartame Toxicity Center, www.holisticmed.com/aspartame
To Investigate:
A juicy letter to the Albuquerque Journal they thought too strong to print:
http://www.wnho.net/letter_abq_journa
Aspartame Manufacturers Tell A Whopper, http://www.wnho.net/whopper.htm
http://www.rense.com/general67/aspar.htm
Ajinomoto, Aspartame & Brain Tumors: Recipe for Death http://www.wnho.net/recipe_for_death.htm
:
Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, by H. J. Roberts, M.D.1,038 page medical text, www.sunsentpress.com or 1 800 827 7991.
See the documentary, Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World, www.docworkers.com
Learn how a deadly neurotoxin got FDA approval even after their tech people said NO!
www.soundandfury.tv/pages/rumsfeld2.html
The Shocking Story of the World's Bestselling Sweetener, http://www.wnho.net/the_ecologist_aspartame_report.htm
Aspartame Interacts with All Drugs, Vaccines and Toxins: http://www.wnho.net/aspartame_interacts.htm
ASPARTAME - THE SHOCKING STORY OF THE WORLD'S BESTSELLING SWEETENER
THE ECOLOGIST
By Pat Thomas
Posted: 26 September 2005
http://www.wnho.net/the_ecologist_aspartame_report.htm
Cover Story, pages 35-46
ASPARTAME - The Shocking Story of the World's Bestselling Sweetener
Aspartame is the most controversial food additive in history. The most recent evidence, linking it to leukaemia and lymphoma, has added substantial fuel to the ongoing protests of doctors, scientists and consumer groups who allege that this artificial sweetener should never have been released onto the market and that allowing it to remain in the food chain is killing us by degrees. PAT THOMAS REPORTS
Once upon a time, aspartame was listed by the Pentagon as a biochemical warfare agent. Today it's an integral part of the modern diet. Sold commercially under names like NutraSweet and Canderel, aspartame can be found in more than 5,000 foods, including fizzy drinks, chewing gum, table-top sweeteners, diet and diabetic foods, breakfast cereals, jams, sweets, vitamins, prescription and over-the-counter drugs. This means that there is a good chance that you and your family are among the two thirds of the adult population and 40 per cent of children who regularly ingest this artificial sweetener.
Because it contains no calories, aspartame is considered a boon to health-conscious individuals everywhere; and most of us, if we think about it at all, think it is safe. But independent scientists say aspartame can produce a range of disturbing adverse effects in humans, including headaches, memory loss, mood swings, seizures, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's-like symptoms, tumours and even death.
Concerns over aspartame's toxicity meant that for eight years, the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) denied it approval, effectively keeping it off the world market. This caution was based on compelling evidence, brought to light by numerous eminent scientists, litigators and consumer groups, that aspartame contributed to serious central nervous system damage and had been shown to cause cancer in animals. Eventually, however, political muscle, won out over scientific rigour, and aspartame was approved for use in 1981 (see timeline for details).
The FDA's about-turn opened the floodgates for aspartame's swift approval by more than 70 regulatory authorities around the world. But, as the remarkable history of the sweetener shows, the clean bill of health given to it by government regulators - whose raison d'être should be to protect the public from harm - is simply not worth the paper it is printed on.
DECEMBER 1965
While working on an ulcer drug, a chemist at pharmaceutical manufacturer GD Searle accidentally discovers aspartame, a substance that is 180 times sweeter than sugar, yet has no calories.
SPRING 1967
Searle begins safety tests, necessary for FDA approval.
AUTUMN 1967
GD Searle approaches eminent biochemist Dr Harry Waisman, director of the University of Wisconsin's Joseph P Kennedy Jr Memorial Laboratory of Mental Retardation Research and a respected expert in the toxicity of phenylalanine (which comprises 50 per cent of the aspartame formula), to conduct a study of the effects of aspartame on primates. Of seven monkeys fed aspartame mixed with milk, one dies and five others have grand mal epileptic seizures.
SPRING 1971
Dr John Olney, professor of neuropathology and psychiatry at Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, whose research into the neurotoxic food additive monosodium glutamate (MSG, a chemical cousin of aspartame) was responsible for having it removed from baby foods, informs Searle that his studies show that aspartic acid, one of the main constituents of aspartame, causes holes in the brains of infant mice. One of Searle's researchers, Ann Reynolds, confirms Olney's findings in a similar study.
FEBRUARY 1973
Searle applies for FDA approval and submits over 100 studies it claims support aspartame's safety. Neither the dead monkeys nor the mice with holes in their brains are included in the submission.
12 SEPTEMBER 1973
In a memorandum, Dr Martha M Freeman of the FDA Division of Metabolic and Endocrine Drug Products criticises the inadequacy of the information submitted by Searle with particular regard to one of the compound's toxic breakdown products, diketopiperazine (DKP). She recommends that marketing of aspartame be contingent upon the sweetener's proven clinical safety.
26 JULY 1974
FDA commissioner Dr Alexander Schmidt grants aspartame its first approval as a 'food additive' for restricted use in dry foods. This approval comes despite the fact that his own scientists found serious deficiencies in the data submitted by Searle.
AUGUST 1974
Before aspartame can reach the marketplace, Dr John Olney, James Turner (attorney, consumer advocate and former 'Nader's Raider' who was instrumental in removing the artificial sweetener cyclamate from the US market), and the group Label Inc (Legal Action for Buyers' Education and Labeling) file a formal objection to aspartame's approval with the FDA, citing evidence that it could cause brain damage, particularly in children.
JULY 1975
Concerns about the accuracy of test data submitted to the FDA by Searle for a wide range of products prompt Schmidt to appoint a special task force to examine irregularities in 25 key studies for aspartame and Searle drugs Flagyl, Aldactone and Norpace.
5 DECEMBER 1975
Searle agrees to an inquiry into aspartame safety concerns. Searle withdraws aspartame from the market pending its results. The sweetener remains off the market for nearly 10 years while investigations into its safety and into Searle's alleged fraudulent testing procedures are ongoing. However, the inquiry board does not convene for another four years.
24 MARCH 1976
The FDA task force completes its 500 page report on Searle's testing procedures. The final report notes faulty and fraudulent product testing, knowingly misrepresented product testing, knowingly misrepresented and 'manipulated' test data, and instances of irrelevant animal research in all the products reviewed. Schmidt says: '[Searle's studies were] incredibly sloppy science. What we discovered was reprehensible.'
JULY 1976
The FDA forms a new task force, headed by veteran inspector Jerome Bressler, to further investigate irregularities in Searle's aspartame studies uncovered by the original task force. The findings of the new body will eventually be incorporated into a document known as the Bressler Report.
10 JANUARY 1977
FDA chief counsel Richard Merrill formally requests the US Attorney's office to begin grand jury proceedings to investigate whether indictments should be filed against Searle for knowingly misrepresenting findings and 'concealing material facts and making false statements' in aspartame safety tests. This is the first time in the FDA's history that it requests a criminal investigation of a manufacturer.
26 JANUARY 1977
While the grand jury investigation is underway, Sidley & Austin, the law firm representing Searle, begins recruitment negotiations with Samuel Skinner, the US attorney in charge of the investigation. Skinner removes himself form the investigation and the case is passed to William Conlon.
8 MARCH 1977
Searle hires prominent Washington insider Donald Rumsfeld as its new CEO to try to turn the beleaguered company around. A former member of Congress and defence secretary in the Ford administration, Rumsfeld brings several of his Washington colleagues in as top management.
1 JULY 1977
Samuel Skinner leaves the US Attorney's office and takes a job with Searle's law firm. Conlon takes over Skinner's old job.
1 AUGUST 1977
The Bressler Report is released. It focuses on three key aspartame studies conducted by Searle. The report finds that in one study 98 of the 196 animals died but weren't autopsied until later dates, making it impossible to ascertain the actual cause of death. Tumours were removed from live animals and the animals placed back in the study. Many other errors and inconsistencies are noted. For example, a rat was reported alive, then dead, then alive, then dead again. Bressler comments: 'The question you have got to ask yourself is: why wasn't greater care taken? Why didn't Searle, with their scientists, closely evaluate this, knowing full well that the whole society, from the youngest to the elderly, from the sick to the unsick. will have access to this product.' The FDA creates yet another task force to review the Bressler Report. The review is carried out by a team at the FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition and headed by senior scientist Jacqueline Verrett.
28 SEPTEMBER 1977
The FDA publishes a report exonerating Searle of any wrongdoing in its testing procedures. Jacqueline Verrett will later testify to the US Senate that her team was pressured into validating data from experiments that were clearly a 'disaster'.
8 DECEMBER 1977
Despite complaints from the Justice Department, Conlon stalls the grand jury prosecution for so long that the statute of limitations on the aspartame charges runs out and the investigation is dropped. Just over a year later Conlon joins Searle's law firm, Sidley & Austin.
1978
The journal Medical World News reports that the methanol content of aspartame is 1,000 times greater than most foods under FDA control. In high concentrations methanol, or wood alcohol, is a lethal poison.
1 JUNE 1979
The FDA finally establishes a public board of inquiry (PBOI), comprising three scientists whose job it is to review the objections of Olney and Turner to the approval of aspartame and rule on safety issues surrounding the sweetener.
1979
In spite of the uncertainties over aspartame's safety in the US, aspartame becomes available, primarily in pharmaceutical products, in France. It is sold under the brand name Canderel and manufactured by the food corporation Merisant.
30 SEPTEMBER 1980
The FDA's PBOI votes unanimously against aspartame's approval, pending further investigations of brain tumours in animals. The board says it 'has not been presented with proof of reasonable certainty that aspartame is safe for use as a food additive'.
1980
Canderel is now marketed throughout much of Europe (but not in the UK) as a low-calorie sweetener.
JANUARY 1981
Rumsfeld states in a Searle sales meeting that he is going to make a big push to get aspartame approved within the year. Rumsfeld vows to 'call in his markers' and use political rather than scientific means to get the FDA on side.
20 JANUARY 1981
Ronald Reagan is sworn in as president of the US. Reagan's transition team, which includes Rumsfeld, nominates Dr Arthur Hull Hayes Jr to be the new FDA commissioner.
21 JANUARY 1981
One day after Reagan's inauguration, Searle re-applies to the FDA for approval to use aspartame as a food sweetener.
MARCH 1981
An FDA commissioner's panel is established to review issues raised by the PBOI.
19 MAY 1981
Arthur Hull Hayes Jr, appoints a five-person commission to review the PBOI's decision. Three of the five FDA scientists on it advise against approval of aspartame, stating on the record that Searle's tests are unreliable and not adequate to determine the safety of aspartame. Hayes installs a sixth member on the commission, and the vote becomes deadlocked.
15 JULY 1981
Hayes ignores the recommendations of his own internal FDA team, overrules the PBOI findings and gives initial approval for aspartame to be used in dry products on the basis that it has been shown to be safe for its proposed uses.
22 OCTOBER 1981
The FDA approves aspartame as a tabletop sweetener and for use in tablets, breakfast cereals, chewing gum, dry bases for beverages, instant coffee and tea, gelatins, puddings, fillings, dairy-product toppings and as a flavour enhancer for chewing gum.
1982
The aspartame-based sweetener Equal, manufactured by Merisant, is launched in the US.
15 OCTOBER 1982
The FDA announces that Searle has filed a petition for aspartame to be approved as a sweetener in carbonated beverages, children's vitamins and other liquids.
1983
Searle attorney Robert Shapiro gives aspartame its commercial name, NutraSweet. The name is trademarked the following year. Shapiro later becomes president of Searle. He eventually becomes president and then chairman and CEO of Monsanto, which will buy Searle in 1985.
8 JULY 1983
Aspartame is approved for use in carbonated beverages and syrup bases in the US and, three months later, Britain. Before the end of the year Canderel tablets are launched in the UK. Granular Canderel follows in 1985.
8 AUGUST 1983
James Turner, on behalf of himself and the Community Nutrition Institute, and Dr Woodrow Monte, Arizona State University's director of food science and nutritional laboratories, file petitions with the FDA objecting to aspartame approval based on possible serious adverse effects from the chronic intake of the sweetener. Monet also cites concern about the chronic intake of methanol associated with aspartame ingestion.
SEPTEMBER 1983
Hayes resigns as FDA commissioner under a cloud of controversy about his taking unauthorised rides aboard a General Foods jet (General Foods was and is a major purchaser of aspartame). He serves briefly as provost at New York Medical College, and then takes a position as senior scientific consultant with Burston-Marsteller, the chief public relations firm for both Searle and Monsanto.
AUTUMN 1983
The first carbonated beverages containing aspartame go on sale in the US.
17 FEBRUARY 1984
The FDA denies Turner and Monte's requests for a hearing, noting that aspartame's critics had not presented any unresolved safety questions. Regarding aspartame's breakdown components, the FDA says that it has reviewed animal, clinical and consumption studies submitted by the sweetener's manufacturer, as well as the existing body of scientific data, and concludes that 'the studies demonstrated the safety of these components'.
MARCH 1984
Public complaints about the adverse effects of aspartame begin to come in. The FDA requests that the US agency the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) begins investigations of a select number of cases of adverse reactions to aspartame.
30 MAY 1984
The FDA approves aspartame for use in multivitamins.
JULY 1984
A study by the state of Arizona Department of Health into aspartame is published in the Journal of Applied Nutrition. It determines that soft drinks stored at elevated temperatures promote more rapid deterioration of aspartame into poisonous methanol.
2 NOVEMBER 1984
The CDC review of public complaints relating to aspartame culminates in a report, Evaluation of Consumer Complaints Related to Aspartame Use, which reviews 213 of 592 cases and notes that re-challenge tests show that sensitive individuals consistently produce the same adverse symptoms each time they ingested aspartame. The reported symptoms include: aggressive behaviour, disorientation, hyperactivity, extreme numbness, excitability, memory loss, loss of depth perception, liver impairment, cardiac arrest, seizures, suicidal tendencies and severe mood swings. The CDC nevertheless concludes that aspartame is safe to ingest. On the same day that the CDC exonerates aspartame, Pepsi announces that it is dropping saccharin and adopting aspartame as the sweetener in all its diet drinks. Others quickly follow suit.
1 OCTOBER 1985
Monsanto, the producer of recombinant bovine growth hormone, genetically engineered Soya beans, the pesticide Roundup and many other industrial and agricultural chemicals, purchases Searle for $2.7 billion.
21 APRIL 1986
The US Supreme Court, headed by Justice Clarence Thomas, a former Monsanto attorney, refuses to consider arguments from the Community Nutrition Institute and other consumer groups that the FDA has not followed proper procedures in approving aspartame, and that the liquid form of the artificial sweetener may cause brain damage in heavy users of low-calorie soft drinks.
16 OCTOBER 1986
Turner files another citizen's petition, this time concerning the risk of seizures and eye damage from aspartame. The petition argues that medical records of 140 aspartame users show them to have suffered from epileptic seizures and eye damage after consuming products containing the sweetener and that the FDA should ban aspartame as an 'imminent hazard to the public health'.
21 NOVEMBER 1986
The FDA denies Turner's new petition, saying: 'The data and information supporting the safety of aspartame are extensive. It is likely that no food product has ever been so closely examined for safety. Moreover, the decisions of the agency to approve aspartame for its uses have been given the fullest airing that the legal process requires.'
28 NOVEMBER 1986
The FDA approves aspartame for non-carbonated frozen or refrigerated concentrates and single-strength fruit juice, fruit drinks, fruit-flavoured drinks, imitation fruit-flavoured drinks, frozen stock-type confections and novelties, breath mints and tea beverages.
DECEMBER 1986
The FDA declares aspartame safe for use as an inactive ingredient, provided labeling meets certain specifications.
1987
An FDA report on adverse reactions associated with aspartame states the majority of the complaints about aspartame - now numbering 3,133 - refer to neurological effects.
2 JANUARY 1987
NutraSweet's aspartame patent runs out in Europe, Canada and Japan. More companies are now free to produce aspartame sweeteners in these countries.
12 OCTOBER 1987
United Press International, a leading global news-syndication organisation, reports that more than 10 federal officials involved in the decision to approve aspartame have now taken jobs in the private sector that are linked to the aspartame industry.
3 NOVEMBER 1987
A US Senate hearing is held to address the issue of aspartame safety and labeling. The hearing reviews the faulty testing procedures and the 'psychological strategy' used by Searle to help ensure aspartame's approval. Other information that comes to light includes the fact that aspartame was once on a Pentagon list of prospective biochemical-warfare weapons.
Numerous medical and scientific experts testify as to the toxicity of aspartame. Among them is Dr Verrett, who reveals that, while compiling its 1977 report, her team was instructed not to comment on or be concerned with the overall validity of the studies. She states that questions about birth defects have not been answered. She also states that increasing the temperature of the product leads to an increase in production of DKP, a substance shown to increase uterine polyps and change blood cholesterol levels. Verrett comments: 'It was pretty obvious that somewhere along the line, the bureau officials were working up to a whitewash.'
1989
The FDA has received more than 4,000 complaints from consumers about adverse reactions to the sweetener.
14 OCTOBER 1989
Dr HJ Roberts, director of the Palm Beach Institute for Medical Research, claims that several recent aircraft accidents involving confusion and aberrant pilot behaviour were caused by ingestion of products containing aspartame.
20 JULY 1990
The Guardian publishes a major investigation of aspartame and delivers to government officials 'a dossier of evidence' that draws heavily on the transcripts of the Bressler Report and demands that the government review the safety of aspartame. No review is undertaken. The Guardian is taken to court by Monsanto and forced to apologize for printing its story.
1991
The US National Institutes of Health publishes Adverse Effects of Aspartame: January '86 through December '90, a bibliography of 167 studies documenting adverse effects associated with aspartame.
1992
NutraSweet signs agreements with Coca-Cola and Pepsi stipulating that it is their preferred supplier of aspartame.
30 JANUARY 1992
The FDA approves aspartame for use in malt beverages, breakfast cereals, and refrigerated puddings and fillings and in bulk form (in large packages like sugar) for tabletop use. NutraSweet markets these bulk products under the name 'NutraSweet Spoonful'.
14 DECEMBER 1992
NutraSweet's US patent for aspartame expires, opening up the market for other companies to produce the substance.
19 APRIL 1993
The FDA approves aspartame for use in hard and soft candies, non-alcoholic flavoured beverages, tea beverages, fruit juices and concentrates, baked goods and baking mixes, and frostings, toppings and fillings for baked goods.
28 FEBRUARY 1994
Aspartame now accounts for the majority (75 per cent) of all the complaints in the US adverse-reaction monitoring system. The US Department of Health and Human Services compiles a report that brings together all current information on adverse reactions attributed to aspartame. It lists 6,888 complaints, including 649 reported by the CDC and 1,305 reported by the FDA.
APRIL 1995
Consumer activist, and founder of anti-aspartame group Mission Possible, Betty Martini uses the US's Freedom of Information Act to force the FDA to release an official list of adverse effects associated with aspartame ingestion. Culled from 10,000 consumer complaints, the list includes four deaths and more than 90 unique symptoms, a majority of which are connected to impaired neurological function. They include: headache; dizziness or problems with balance; mood change; vomiting and nausea; seizures and convulsions; memory loss; tremors; muscle weakness; abdominal pains and cramps; change in vision; diarrhea; fatigue and weakness; skin rashes; deteriorating vision; joint and musculoskeletal pain. By the FDA's own admission, fewer then 1 per cent of those who have problems with something they consume ever report it to the FDA. This means that around 1 million people could have been experiencing adverse effects from ingesting aspartame.
12 JUNE 1995
The FDA announces it has no further plans to continue to collect adverse reaction reports or monitor research on aspartame.
27 JUNE 1996
The FDA removes all restrictions from aspartame use, and approves it as a general-purpose sweetener', meaning that aspartame can now be used in any food or beverage.
NOVEMBER 1996
Drawing on data compiled by the US National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results programme, which collects and distributes data on all types of cancer, Olney publishes peer-reviewed research in the Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology. It shows that brain-tumour rates have risen in line with aspartame consumption and that there has been a significant increase in the conversion of less deadly tumours into much more deadly ones.
DECEMBER 1996
The results of a remarkable study conducted by Dr Ralph G Walton, professor of clinical psychology at Northeastern Ohio Universities, are revealed. Commissioned by the hard-hitting US national news programme 60 Minutes, it sheds some light on the absurdity of aspartame-safety studies. Walton reviewed 165 separate studies published in the preceding 20 years in peer-reviewed medical journals. Seventy-four of the studies were industry-funded, all of which attested to aspartame's safety. Of the other 91 non-industry funded studies, 84 identified adverse health effects. Six of the seven non-industry funded studies that were favourable to aspartame were from the FDA, which has a public record of strong pro-industry bias. To this day, the industry-funded studies are the ones that are always quoted to the press and in official rebuttals to aspartame critics. They are also the studies given the greatest weight during the approval process and in official safety reviews.
10 FEBRUARY 1998
Monsanto petitions the FDA for approval of a new tabletop sweetener called Neotame. It is around 60 times sweeter than aspartame and up to 13,000 times sweeter than sugar. Neotame is less prone to breaking down in heat and in liquids than aspartame because of the addition of 3,3-dimethylbutyl, a poorly studied chemical with suspected neurotoxic effects. Strengthening the bond between aspartame's main constituents eliminates the need for a health warning directed at people suffering from PKU.
13 MAY 1998
Independent scientists from the University of Barcelona publish a landmark study clearly showing that aspartame is transformed into formaldehyde in the bodies of living specimens (in this case rats), and that this formaldehyde spreads throughout the specimens' vital organs, including the liver, kidneys, eyes and brain. The results fly in the face of manufacturers' claims that aspartame does not break down into formaldehyde in the body, and bolster the claims of aspartame critics that many of the symptoms associated with aspartame toxicity are caused by the poisonous and cumulative effects of formaldehyde.
OCTOBER 1998
The UK's Food Commission publishes two surveys on sweeteners. The first shows that several leading companies, including St Ivel, Müller and Sainsbury's, have ignored the legal requirement to state 'with sweeteners' next to the name of the product. The second reveals that aspartame not only appears in 'no-sugar added' and 'light' beverages but also in ordinary non-dietetic drinks because it's three times cheaper than ordinary sugar.
8 FEBRUARY 1999
Monsanto files a petition with the FDA for approval of the general use of Neotame.
20 JUNE 1999
An investigation by The Independent on Sunday reveals that aspartame is made using a genetic engineering process. Aspartame component phenylalanine is naturally produced by bacteria. The newspaper reveals that Monsanto has genetically engineered the bacteria to make them produce more phenylalanine. Monsanto claims that the process had not been revealed previously because no modified DNA remains in the finished product, and insists that the product is completely safe; though scientists counter that toxic effects cannot be ruled out in the absence of long-term studies. A Monsanto spokeswoman says that while aspartame for the US market is often made using genetic engineering, aspartame supplied to British food producers is not. The extent to which US brands of low-calorie products containing genetically engineered aspartame have been imported into Britain is unclear.
MAY 2000
Monsanto, under pressure - not least from the worldwide resistance to genetically manipulated food and ongoing lawsuits - sells NutraSweet to JW Childs Associates, a private-equity firm comprised of several former Monsanto managers, for $440m. Monsanto also sells its equity interest in two European sweetener joint ventures, NutraSweet AG and Euro-Aspartame SA.
10 DECEMBER 2001
The UK's Food Standards Agency requests that the European Commission Scientific Committee on Food conducts an updated review of aspartame. The committee is asked to look carefully at more than 500 scientific papers published between 1988 and 2000 and any other new scientific research not examined previously.
9 JULY 2002
The FDA approves the tabletop and general use of Neotame. The 'fast-track' approval raises eyebrows because, historically, the FDA takes at least 10 years to approve food additives. Neotame is also approved for use in Australia and New Zealand, but has yet to be approved in the UK.
10 DECEMBER 2002
The European Commission Scientific Committee on Food publishes its final report on aspartame. The 24-page report largely ignores independent research and consumer complaints, relying instead on frequently cited articles in books and reviews put together by employees or consultants of aspartame manufacturers. When independent research is cited, it is generally refuted with industry-sponsored data. An animal study showing aspartame's disruption of brain chemistry, a human study linking aspartame to neurophysiological changes that could increase seizure risk, another linking aspartame use with depression in individuals susceptible to mood disorder, and two others linking aspartame ingestion with headaches are all dismissed.
The report's conclusion amounts to a single sentence: 'The committee concluded that. there is no evidence to suggest that there is a need to revise the outcome of the earlier risk assessment or the [acceptance daily intake] previously established for aspartame.'
As with the FDA, there are concerns about the neutrality of some of the committee's members and their links with the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI), an industry group that funds, among other things, research into aspartame. ILSI members include Monsanto, Coca-Cola and Pepsi.
19 FEBRUARY 2003
Members of the European Parliament's Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy Committee approve the use of sucralose (see page 50) and an aspartame-acesulfame salt compound (manufactured in Europe by the aspartame-producing Holland Sweetener Company and sold under the name Twinsweet), agreeing to review of the use of both in three years' time. At the same time, a request by European greens that the committee re-evaluate the safety of aspartame and improve the labeling of aspartame-containing products is rejected.
MAY 2004
The feature-length documentary Sweet Misery is released on DVD (see http://www.soundandfuryproductions.com). Part-documentary, part-detective story, it includes interviews with people who have been harmed by aspartame, as well as credible testimony from advocates, doctors, lawyers and long-time campaigners, including James Turner, HJ Roberts and renowned neurosurgeon Dr Russell Blaylock. (UK orders: Namaste Publishing, info@namastepublishing.co.uk.)
SEPTEMBER 2004
US consumer group the National Justice League files a $350m class action lawsuit against the NutraSweet Corporation (the current owner of aspartame products), the American Diabetes Association and Monsanto. Some 50 other defendants have yet to be named, but mentioned throughout the lawsuit is the central role of Donald Rumsfeld in helping to get aspartame approved through the FDA. The plaintiffs maintain that this litigation will prove how deadly aspartame is when it is consumed by humans. Little progress has been made so far in bringing the action to court. The NutraSweet Company reopens its plant in Atlanta, Georgia, (dormant since 2003) in order to meet increased demand for its sweetener. Aspartame, sold commercially as NutraSweet, Equal, Equal-Measure, Spoonful, Canderel and Benevia, is currently available in more than 100 countries and used in more than 5,000 products by at least 250 million people every day. Worldwide, the aspartame industry's sales amount to more than $1 billion yearly. The US is the primary consumer.
JULY 2005
The Ramizzini Institute in Bologna, a non-profit, private institution set up to research the causes of cancer, releases the results of a very large, long-term animal study into aspartame ingestion. Its study shows that aspartame causes lymphomas and leukaemia in female animals fed aspartame at doses around 20 milligrams per kilogram of body weight, or around half the accepted daily intake for humans.
Page 47
ASPARTAME REACTIONS: A HIDDEN EPIDEMIC
Aspartame has been linked to a host of devastating central nervous system disorders
When aspartame was approved for use, Dr HJ Roberts, director of the Palm Beach Institute for Medical Research, had no reason to doubt the FDA's decision. 'But my attitude changed,' he says, 'after repeatedly encountering serious reactions in my patients that seemed justifiably linked to aspartame.' Twenty years on, Roberts has coined the phrase 'aspartame disease' to describe the wide range of adverse effects he has seen among aspartame-guzzling patients.
He estimates: 'Hundreds of thousands of consumers, more likely millions, currently suffer major reactions to products containing aspartame. Today, every physician probably encounters aspartame disease in everyday practice, especially among patients with illnesses that are undiagnosed or difficult to treat.'
As a guide for other doctors, Roberts, a recognised expert in difficult diagnoses, has published a lengthy series of case studies, Aspartame Disease: an ignored epidemic (Sunshine Sentinel Press), in which he meticulously details his treatment of 1,200 aspartame-sensitive individuals, or 'reactors', encountered in his own practice. Following accepted medical procedure for detecting sensitivities to foods, Roberts had his patients remove aspartame from their diets. With nearly two thirds of reactors, symptoms began to improve within days of removing aspartame, and improvements were maintained as long as aspartame was kept out of their diet.
Roberts' case studies parallel much of what was revealed in the FDA's report on adverse reactions to aspartame - that toxicity often reveals itself through central nervous system disorders and compromised immunity. His casework shows that aspartame toxicity can mimic the symptoms of and/or worsen several diseases that fall into these broad categories (see sidebar, below).
Case studies, especially a large series like this, address some of the issues surrounding real-world use in a way that laboratory studies never can; and the conclusions that can be drawn from such observations aren't just startling, they are also potentially highly significant. In fact, Roberts believes that one of the major problems with aspartame research has been the continued over-emphasis on laboratory studies. This has meant that the input of concerned independent physicians and other interested persons, especially consumers, is 'reflexively discounted as "anecdotal"'.
Many of the diseases listed by Roberts fall into the category of medicine's 'mystery diseases' - conditions with no clear etiology and few effective cures. And while no one is suggesting that aspartame is the single cause of such diseases, Roberts' research suggests that some people diagnosed with, for example, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's or chronic fatigue syndrome may end up on a regimen of potentially harmful drugs that could have been avoided if they simply stopped ingesting aspartame-laced products.
Sidebar
Conditions Mimicked By Aspartame Toxicity
§ Multiple sclerosis
§ Parkinson's disease
§ Alzheimer's disease
§ Fibromyalgia
§ Arthritis
§ Multiple chemical sensitivity
§ Chronic fatigue syndrome
§ Attention deficit disorder
§ Panic disorder depression and other psychological disorders
§ Lupus § Diabetes and diabetic complications
§ Birth defects
§ Lymphoma
§ Lyme disease
§ Hypothyroidism
Pages 48-49
ASPARTAME'S TOXIC CONTENTS
Aspartame is made up of three chemicals: the amino acids aspartic acid and phenylalanine, and methanol. The chemical bond that holds these constituents together is fairly weak. As a result, aspartame readily breaks down into its component parts in a variety of circumstances: in liquids; during prolonged storage; when exposed to heat in excess of 86° Fahrenheit (30° Centigrade); and when ingested. These constituents further break down into other toxic by-products, namely formaldehyde, formic acid and aspartylphenylalanine diketopiperazine (DKP).
Manufacturers argue that the instability of aspartame is irrelevant since its constituents are all found naturally in food. This is only partially true and ignores the fact that in food amino acids like aspartic acid and phenylalanine are bound to proteins, which means that during digestion and metabolism they are released slowly into the body. In aspartame, these amino acids are in an unbound or 'free' form that releases greater amounts of these chemicals into the system much more quickly. Similarly, the methanol present in natural foods like fruits, for example, is bound to pectin and also has a co-factor, ethanol, to mediate some of its effects. No such chemical 'back-stops' exist in aspartame.
According to neuroscientist Russell Blaylock, the effect of aspartame's breakdown components on brain function is central to its known adverse effects. Like monosodium glutamate (MSG) and L-cysteine, an amino acid found in hydrolysed vegetable protein, aspartame is what is known as an 'excitotoxin' - a chemical transmitter that allows brain cells to communicate. Blaylock has written a book about them, Excitotoxins: the taste that kills, and says: 'Even a minute over-concentration of these chemicals causes the brain cells to become so over-excited that they very quickly burn themselves out and die.'
While aspartame manufacturers say aspartame cannot penetrate the blood-brain barrier - the tightly-walled membrane that keeps toxins from reaching the brain, Blaylock counters that a number of factors make the blood-brain barrier more porous, including exposure to pesticides, hypoglycaemia, all immune diseases (such as lupus and diabetes), Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, strokes (including silent strokes) and a whole range of medical drugs. Under these conditions, ingesting aspartame-laced foods may cause a spike in the level of excitotoxins that directly reach the brain, thus increasing the likelihood of adverse effects. Each of aspartame's main constituents is a known neurotoxin capable of producing a unique array of adverse effects.
PHENYLALANINE
The essential amino acid phenylalanine comprises 50 per cent of aspartame. In people disorder, phenylketonuria (PKU) with the genetic the liver cannot metabolise phenylalanine, causing it to build up in the blood and tissues. Chronically high levels of phenylalanine and its breakdown products cause significant neurological problems, which is why foods and beverages containing aspartame must carry a warning for PKU sufferers.
But according to Dr HJ Roberts, sensitivity to aspartame is not limited to PKU sufferers. PKU carriers - people who inherited the gene for the disorder but do not themselves have the condition (around 2 per cent of the general population) - are also more prone to adverse effects. In Roberts' data there is also a high incidence of aspartame reactions among the close relatives of patients who cannot tolerate aspartame. Furthermore, there is evidence that ingesting aspartame, especially along with carbohydrates, can lead to excess levels of phenylalanine in the brain even among those not affected by PKU.
Although phenylalanine is sometimes used as a treatment for depression, excessive amounts in the brain can cause levels of the mood regulator serotonin to decrease, making depression more serious or likely. Build-up of phenylalanine in the brain can also worsen schizophrenia or make individuals more susceptible to seizures. Moreover, decrease in serotonin levels can result in carbohydrate craving. This could explain aspartame's lack of effectiveness as a diet aid.
DKP
DKP is a breakdown product of phenylalanine that forms when aspartame-containing liquids are stored for prolonged periods. In animal experiments it has produced brain tumours, uterine polyps and changes in blood cholesterol. Before the FDA approved aspartame, the amount of DKP in our diets was essentially zero. So no claim of DKP's safety can be accepted as genuine until good-quality long-term studies have been performed. No such studies have been done.
ASPARTIC ACID
Aspartic acid (also known as aspartate) is a non-essential amino acid that comprises 40 per cent of aspartame. In the brain, it functions as a neurotransmitter - facilitating the transfer of information from one nerve cell (neuron) to another. Both human and animal experiments have demonstrated a significant spike in blood-plasma levels of aspartate after the administration of aspartame in liquids. Too much aspartate in the brain produces free radicals, unstable molecules that damage and kill brain cells.
Humans are five times more sensitive to the effects of aspartic acid (as well as glutamic acid, found in MSG) than rodents, and 20 times more sensitive than monkeys, because we concentrate these excitatory amino acids in our blood at much higher levels and for a longer period of time. Aspartic acid has a cumulative harmful effect on the endocrine and reproductive systems. Several animal experiments have shown that excitotoxins can penetrate the placental barrier and reach the foetus.
In addition, as levels of aspartic acid rise in the body so do levels of the key neurotransmitter norepinephrine (also known as noradrenaline), a 'stress hormone' that affects parts of the human brain where attention and impulsivity are controlled. Excessive norepinephrine is associated with symptoms such as anxiety, agitation and mania.
METHANOL
Methanol (wood alcohol) comprises 10 per cent of aspartame. It is a deadly poison that is liberated from aspartame at temperatures in excess of 86° Fahrenheit (30° centigrade) - for instance, during storage or inside the human body. The US Environmental Protection Agency considers methanol a 'cumulative poison due to the low rate of excretion once it is absorbed', meaning that even small amounts in aspartame-containing foods can build up over time in the body.
The most well known problems from methanol poisoning are vision disorders, including misty or blurry vision, retinal damage and blindness. Other symptoms include headaches, Tinnitus, dizziness, nausea, gastrointestinal disturbances, weakness, vertigo, chills, memory lapses, numbness and shooting pains in the extremities behavioural disturbances, and neuritis.
The EPA tightly controls methanol exposure, allowing only very minute levels to be present in foods or in environmental exposures. But Blaylock says: 'The level allowed in NutraSweet is seven times the amount that the EPA will allow anyone else to use.'
FORMALDEHYDE
The methanol absorbed from aspartame is converted to formaldehyde in the liver. Formaldehyde is a neurotoxin and known carcinogen. It causes retinal damage and birth defects, interferes with DNA replication, and has been shown to cause squamous-cell carcinoma, a form of skin cancer, in animals. Several human studies have found that chronic, low-level formaldehyde exposure has been linked with a variety of symptoms, including headaches, fatigue, chest tightness, dizziness, nausea, poor concentration and seizures.
FORMIC ACID
Formic acid is a cumulative poison produced by the breakdown of formaldehyde. It concentrates in the brain, kidneys, spinal fluid and other organs, and is highly toxic to cells. Formic acid can lead to accumulation of excessive acid in the body fluids - a condition known as acidosis. The small amounts of formic acid derived from the methanol absorbed from aspartame may or may not be dangerous; there are no human or mammalian studies to enlighten us.
Comment, page 49
ASPARTAME: TIME FOR ACTION
The story of aspartame is the story of the triumph of corporate might over scientific rigour. It shines a spotlight on the archaic and unbalanced procedure for approving food additives.
We ingest food additives daily, yet their approval does not require the same scientific thoroughness as drug approval; and, unlike drugs, there is no requirement for surveillance of adverse effects that crop up once the additive is in use.
Approval does not involve looking at what people are already eating and whether the proposed substance will interact with other additives. Nor does it take into account whether the additive exacerbates damage caused by other aspects of the modern lifestyle (for instance, the neurological damage caused by pesticide ingestion or exposure). Nor does it look for subtle chronic effects (for instance, the gradual build-up of methanol in the body with regular aspartame ingestion).
There are other problems. Most studies into aspartame are animal studies, which are notoriously difficult to relate to humans. So why bother performing them in the first place? The answer is, manufacturers and regulators use animal research as a double-edged sword. If an animal study reveals no evidence of harm, the manufacturer can use it to support its case. If it reveals harm, however, the manufacturer is free to flip-flop into the argument that the results of animal studies are inconclusive in relation to humans. Faced with inconclusive evidence regulators will always err on the side of the manufacturer, who has after all demonstrated proper bureaucratic procedure by funding and submitting its animal tests for consideration.
The approval process for any substance that humans put in their mouths on a daily basis should be based on solid human data and on the precautionary principle when such data is not available. But, as it stands, the regulation of food additives in the US, the UK and elsewhere leaves the burden of proof of harm on average people, despite the fact that most of us are either too detached or too timid to complain or simply don't have the energy to take on multinational corporations.
The history of aspartame is all the more remarkable because of the number of motivated people who have refused to accept the mantra 'if it's approved by the government it must be safe'. Nearly every piece of independent research shows the outrage of these people, who have had to withstand threats of litigation and being vilified in the media as 'hysterics', is justified.
After 30 years of aspartame's commercial success, it would be easy to conclude it is too late to act. And yet earlier this year hundreds of products were swept off supermarket shelves on the chance that they might have contained minuscule amounts of a potentially carcinogenic dye, Sudan 1. No studies existed to show that Sudan 1 could cause cancer in humans. The likelihood of any one person's exposure to Sudan 1 being high enough to produce a tumour was minute. Nevertheless, on the basis of the precautionary principle, action was taken.
Aspartame is not a life-saving drug. It is not even a very effective diet aid, as shown by widespread obesity in the West. Until the many concerns about it have been examined in 'corporate-neutral', large-scale, long-term, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled human trials (the gold standard of scientific proof) it should be taken out of our food.
Pages 50-51
SUCRALOSE: LIFE AFTER ASPARTAME
Aspartame should never have reached the marketplace. But even if the authorities were to remove it from sale tomorrow, how much faith should consumers place in the other artificial sweeteners on the market? PAT THOMAS REPORTS
There is not a single artificial sweetener on the market that can claim, beyond all reasonable doubt, to be safe for humans to consume. Saccharin, cyclamate and acesulfame-K have all been show to cause cancer in animals. Even the family of relatively benign sweeteners known as polyols, such as sorbitol and mannitol, can cause gastric upset if eaten in quantity. NutraSweet believes that its new aspartame-based sweetener, Neotame, is 'revolutionary'; but, seemingly, it is only amore stable version of aspartame. This leaves the market wide open for sucralose.
Sucralose, sold commercially as Splenda, was discovered in 1976 by researchers working for British sugar refiner Tate & Lyle. Four years later, Tate & Lyle joined forces with Johnson & Johnson to develop and commercialise sucralose under the auspices of a new company, McNeil Specialty Products (now called McNeil Nutritionals). Sucralose has been approved by more than 60 regulatory bodies throughout the world, and is now in more than 3,000 products worldwide. In the US, Coca-Cola has developed a new diet drink sweetened with Splenda, and other major soft drink manufacturers are expected to follow suit.
Splenda has had to rethink its slogan "made from sugar, so it tastes like sugar" in the wake of a heated US legal challenge and a recent ruling by the New Zealand Advertising Standards Authority that said it confused and misled consumers. While it is true that sugar, or sucrose, is one of the starting materials for sucralose, its chemical structure is significantly different from that of sucrose.
In a complex chemical process, the sucrose is processed with, among other things, phosgene (a chemical-warfare agent used during WWI, now a common intermediary in the production of plastics, pesticides and dyes), and three atoms of chlorine are selectively substituted for three hydroxyl (hydrogen and oxygen) groups naturally attached to the sugar molecule.
This process produces 1,6-dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-beta-D-fructofuranosyl-4-chloro4-deoxy-alpha-D-galactopyranoside (also known as trichlorogalactosucrose or sucralose), a new chemical substance which Tate & Lyle calls a 'water-soluble chlorocarbohydrate'.
Accepting Tate & Lyle's classification of sucralose as a chlorocarbohydrate at face value raises reasonable concerns about its suitability as a food additive. Chlorinated carbohydrates belong to a class of chemicals known as chlorocarbons. This class of chemicals includes a number of notorious human and environmental poisons, including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); aliphatic chlorinated carbohydrates; aromatic chlorinated carbohydrates such as DDT; organochlorine pesticides such as aldrin and dieldrin; and aromatic chlorinated ethers such as polychlorinated dioxins (PCDD) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDF).
Most of the synthetic chlorinated compounds that we ingest, such as the pesticide residues in our food and water, bio-accumulate slowly in the body; and many cause developmental problems in the womb or are carcinogenic. How do we know that sucralose is any different?
Tate & Lyle insists that sucralose passes through the body virtually intact, and that the tight molecular bond between the chlorine atoms and the sugar molecule results in a very stable and versatile product that is not metabolised in the body for calories. This doesn't mean, however, that sucralose is not metabolised in the body at all, and critics like HJ Roberts argue that, during storage and in the body, sucralose breaks down into among other things 1,6 dichlorofructose, a chlorinated compound that has not been adequately tested in humans.
Tate & Lyle maintains that sucralose and its breakdown products have been extensively tested and proven safe for human consumption. The company notes that in seeking approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), McNeil Specialty Products submitted more than 110 studies that attested to the safety of sucralose.
BUT CAN CONSUMERS TRUST THIS RESEARCH DATA?
The vast majority of studies submitted to the FDA were unpublished animal and laboratory studies performed by Tate & Lyle itself, and therefore liable to charges of potentially unacceptable bias. Only five involved human subjects, and these were short-term, often single-dose, studies that clearly could not adequately reflect the expected real-world usage of sucralose. After questions were raised by the FDA about the safety of sucralose for diabetics, and prior to approval, a further five human studies were eventually submitted. On 1 April 1998 the FDA approved sucralose for limited uses; one year later it approved it as a general-purpose sweetener.
Some questions about sucralose's safety, arising from the data submitted to the FDA, remain unanswered. These studies included unsettling findings about animals, which, when exposed to high doses of sucralose, experienced: § Shrunken thymus and spleen;
§ Enlarged liver and kidneys; and
§ Reduced growth rate in adults and newborns.
In the FDA's 'final-rule' report, several of the studies submitted by McNeil were found to have 'inconclusive' results or were 'insufficient' to draw firm conclusions from them. These included:
§ A test that examined the clastogenic activity (ability to break chromosomes apart) of sucralose, and a test that looked for chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes exposed to sucralose';
§ A series of three animal genotoxicity studies; and
§ Laboratory studies using lymphoma tissue from mice which showed that sucralose was weakly mutagenic' (capable of causing cellular mutations).
Clastogenic, genotoxic and mutagenic substances are all potential risk factors in the development of cancer.
In addition to these, three studies that looked at very specific 'anti-fertility' effects of sucralose and its breakdown products, especially with regard to sperm production were also deemed insufficient; this is particularly worrying, since other 'chlorosugars', such as 6-chloroglucose, are currently being studied as anti-spermatogenic drugs.
Furthermore, the administration observed that McNeil had failed to explain satisfactorily a reduction in body weight seen in animals fed sucralose and that 'additional study data were needed to resolve this issue'. Ironically for a product that 'tastes like sugar', McNeil argued that weight loss was due to the 'reduced palatability of sucralose-containing diets'. FDA reviewers also found that at mid to high doses there was a trend towards 'decreasing white blood cell and lymphocyte counts with increasing dose levels of sucralose'. This was dismissed as having no 'statistical significance' by the FDA; in healthy animals and humans this may be so, but what happens when already immune-compromised individuals ingest sucralose?
Tate & Lyle says that any lingering concerns about sucralose are unfounded and that only a small amount, 15-20 per cent, of sucralose is absorbed and broken down in the human gut. The rest passes through the body unmetabolised and is excreted in urine and faeces. This in itself provokes important questions.
§ What happens to sucralose that is flushed down the toilet? Does it remain stable or react with other substances (for instance, the chlorine used in water-treatment plants, or microbial life) to form new compounds?
§ Is sucralose or any resulting chemical compound it may form safe for the environment? Is it harmful to aquatic life or wild animals?
§ Will sucralose begin to appear in our water supply, in the way that certain drugs have, silently increasing our exposure to it? And would that increased exposure be safe?
PUBLISH AND BE SUED
In the face of emerging public criticism, lawyers for Tate & Lyle are already gearing up for a battle. According to attorney James Turner, a key player in the aspartame drama, 'There's going to be a huge fight about Splenda in the next few months.[Tate & Lyle's] lawyers are already on the case trying to shut everybody up'.
It's a tactic that worked well for Monsanto, which certainly used legal pressure against anyone who criticised NutraSweet. Recently, the publisher of the local newspaper the Brighton Argus considered it prudent to publish an apology composed by Tate & Lyle (or their lawyers) or face a legal action for defamation and loss of sales after printing an article suggesting that sucralose was harmful to humans.
Tate & Lyle's first high-profile victim, however, was mercola.com - one of the world's most visited internet health sites. Run by Dr Joseph Mercola, the site has been a vocal critic of sucralose for years. Instead of carrying freely available information on sucralose that might stimulate spirited public debate, it now carries the following message:
'Attorneys acting on behalf of the manufacturers of sucralose, Tate & Lyle Plc, based in London, England, have requested that the information contained on this page not be made available to internet users in England.'
At this point, concerned consumers should be asking themselves several questions. Does the story of sucralose sound familiar? If sucralose is safe beyond any reasonable doubt, why is there such a fervent need to suppress any criticism of it? Finally, whom do such tactics really serve? Do they serve the consumer and the principles of choice, information, safety and redress? Or do they serve the corporate machine and its need to keep generating profits without taking responsibility for the human cost of doing so?
New Mexico Sets Hearing To Ban Aspartame
The Idaho Observer
10-14-5
http://www.rense.com/general68/newmexicosetshearing.htm
Sweetener manufacturer disputes validity of new health research
· Study links aspartame with cancers
· Ingredient used in more than 6,000 products
Felicity Lawrence
Friday September 30, 2005
The Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/food/Story/0,2763,1581639,00.html?gusrc=rss
ED NOTE: Ann and I drove to Lubbock, Texas, over the
Labor Day weekend. We stopped at a Furr's Cafeteria (buffet), in Hobbs, New
Mexico, to eat dinner. While on the serving line, Ann noticed a sign,
professionally done, that warned some dishes might contain Aspartame. That's a
first. And, it's a great start!
New Mexico Takes Lead In Banning Aspartame
From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
Bettym19@mindspring.com
Wednesday, September 07, 2005
Thank you for your interest in the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board
meeting September 6, regarding a proposed rule change which would ban the
neurotoxic sweetener, aspartame, for the state of New Mexico, the first ban of
its kind in the USA.
What was scheduled as a 5 minute agenda item, a decision as to whether to have a
full scale hearing in the coming months, turned into an 80 minute legal wrangle
over whether the EIB has the power to challenge a product with FDA approval, as
well as which statutes allowed such a rule change, and where in the
Administrative Code the rule change should be inserted.
My reading of the statutes is quite clear; in the Food Act, Chapter 25 of the NM
statutes, the power to identify deleterious or poisonous food additives is
spelled out in no uncertain terms, and the power is given to the EIB and to no
other branch of state government, not the Health Department and not the
Governor's office.
There is no equivalent mirror section of the New Mexico Administrative Code to
match the very clear language of the statutes, and that was the crux of my
proposed rule change, which also added specific language about neurotoxic food
additives being prohibited, and clearly identified aspartame as one to be banned
in New Mexico.
Three state Senators [Pro Tem Senate President Ben Altamirano, Steve Komadina,
M.D., and Jerry Ortiz y Pino], and one state Rep. [Harriet Ruiz] weighed in on
this by sending in letters to the EIB, asking the Board to move forward toward a
decision to get rid of this neurotoxin; several important physicians [Dr. Grant
La Farge, Pediatric Cardiologist; Dr. Ken Stoller, Pediatrician; Dr.
H.J.Roberts, Internal Medicine, and Dr. R.G. Walton, Psychiatrist] and numerous
victims of aspartame poisoning from all over the United States, all submitted
letters to the Board asking them to hold further hearings.
The cautionary and heavy-handed advice of the Board's Counsel, Assistant
Attorney General Mary H. Smith, figured heavily into the EIB's reluctance to
jump into this new, untested arena of food quality regulation; even though it is
quite well know that no other body in New Mexico has the statutory power to
control food quality. This counsel to the EIB was in direct contradiction to the
advice graciously afforded to me by another Assistant Attorney General, almost
as if they were two automobiles going in opposite and diametrically opposed
directions!
This is perhaps understandable, because, astonishingly, there is not one iota of
case law on this matter, because since the statutes were passed in 1941, no one
in New Mexico has ever used these statutes to reject or even question the
presence of well-known poisonous and deleterious food additives, even though the
statutory mechanisms to delineate the toxins and what to do about them is quite
clear in the statutes.
I, as petitioner, (in the next 15 days, in order to comply with the filing
schedule requirements) am forced to bring in a greatly expanded circle of legal
experts to present the legal facts on this issue at the next EIB meeting in
early October, in a presentation limited in toto to one half hour, specifically
those jurisdictional questions and statutory clarifications which will satisfy
the EIB's concerns so that it can move forward toward resolving these issues
decisively, with its highest concern being to protect the health of all New
Mexicans.
The FDA pre emption questions will loom large in the considerations by the New
Mexico Environmental Improvement Board in early October: has any state ever
stood up so strongly about getting rid of a product (aspartame) which has been
approved for 24 years, yet done so much obvious cumulative neurodegenerative
damage on so many millions of people?
Apparently the EIB members were bombarded with many emails, and the Assistant
Attorney General, Mary Smith, wrote in her memorandum that "the Attorney
General's Office computer system has been flooded with emails about this
matter," that she asked "her computer staff to block any unsolicited emails that
contain the word "aspartame" in the subject line and to send those to our spam
folder for immediate deletion!" (although, curiously, not one of the board
members complained in the meeting about the volume of emailed
communications---personally, I think the members' medical comprehension of
neurotoxic food additives is much clearer now because of physicians' and
victims' emails to them).
This might seem like a temporary setback for open and sincere communications on
a very serious subject, the neurotoxicity of commonly available food additive,
to the very board which has the sole power to do something positive to correct
and prevent further neurodegenerative damages from the 5000 products consumed by
70% of Americans.
However, your views on these matters are still very vital, so please ask your
friends and family to also write letters asking for a ban on aspartame in New
Mexico, and please send them in writing (not Email) to:
Barbara Claire, EIB administrator Department of Environment, N2153 1190 So. St.
Francis Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502 email: barbara.claire@state.nm.us, if you
have a specific question
with 7 copies, one for each member of the Environmental Improvement Board.
I would also send the same kind of letter directed to both:
The Governor of New Mexico, The Honorable Bill Richardson, The Capitol, Santa
Fe, New Mexico 87501
The Attorney General of New Mexico, The Honorable Patricia Madrid The Bataan
Building, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501
Clearly, the Executive branch has enormous powers to bring about our goals, and
the Attorney General has enormous powers to initiate suits regarding aspartame's
damages similar to the tobacco suits of the Attorneys General in the 1990's. (In
a legal causal sense, there really is little difference between tobacco's lung
cancer and aspartame's proven neurodegenerative damages.)
Thank you for all of your help, and please keep the unrelenting correspondence
to these officials going, in order to get this vital task accomplished, the
first ban on neurotoxic aspartame in the United States! I welcome your replies
and your insights.
Respectfully,
Stephen Fox
Founder, New Mexico Nutrition Council
217 W. Water St.
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501
505 983-2002
stephen@santafefineart.com
For more information on aspartame:
http://www.wnho.net ,
http://www.dorway.com ,
http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame (Aspartame Toxicity Center), and
http://www.aspartamekills.com
Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, H. J. Roberts, M.D.,
www.sunsentpress.com or 1 800 827 7991
Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D.,
www.russellblaylockmd.com
Aspartame Documentary: Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World, www.docworkers.com
Aspartame Information List for updates - www.wnho.net front page
Athlete Alert - Aspartame & MSG In Sudden
Cardiac Arrest San Francisco 49ers Lineman Collapses, Dies After Preseason Game
By Eddie Pells
The Associated Press
August 23, 2005
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGBXT5AZMCE.html
DENVER (AP) - An offensive lineman for the San Francisco 49ers collapsed in the locker room and died Sunday morning, shortly after the team played the Denver Broncos in a preseason game.
Players had finished listening to coach Mike Nolan address them in a post-game meeting when Thomas Herrion, a 6-foot-3, 310-pound first-year player, collapsed. Medics administered CPR on him and took him to an ambulance that rushed him to a nearby hospital.
About three hours later, 49ers spokesman Aaron Salkin confirmed that Herrion had died. The cause of death was not immediately known.
"This is a colossal tragedy for the 49ers and the entire NFL community," Salkin said. "We still do not know all the details. Our thoughts and prayers are with the Herrion family."
The death comes a little more than four years after offensive lineman Korey Stringer of the Minnesota Vikings died of heatstroke during a training camp practice on a day during which the heat index soared to 110.
Since Stringer's death, NFL teams have increased their efforts to teach players about hydration and how to manage the heat, experimenting with sensors to measure players' core body temperatures.
On Saturday night in Denver, temperatures were in the mid-60s with 50 percent humidity, although experts say heatstroke can occur even in cool conditions.
After the game, Nolan said he had no comments about San Francisco's 26-21 loss to the Broncos.
"There are more important things on our mind than the game," he said. "Right now, our thoughts and prayers are with Thomas Herrion."
Stringer's death was thought to be the first of its kind in the NFL. In 1979, St. Louis Cardinals tight end J.V. Cain died of a heart attack during training camp. Chuck Hughes, a wide receiver for the Detroit Lions, died of a heart attack Oct. 24, 1972, during a game in Detroit against the Chicago Bears.
This story can be found at:
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGBXT5AZMCE.html
Athlete Alert - Aspartame And MSG In Sudden Cardiac Arrest
Contributed By Dr. Betty Martini
Mission Possible International
August 23, 2005
Aspartame
Originally Posted At:
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/4/prwebxml225071.php
Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D. explains the relationship between sudden cardiac death, especially in athletes, and excitotoxic damage produced by food additives and artificial sweeteners.
(PRWEB) April 14, 2005 -- Dr. Russell Blaylock, an author and neurosurgeon, explains the relationship between sudden cardiac death, especially in athletes, and excitotoxic damage caused by food additives and artificial sweeteners. -- By Russell L. Blaylock, M.D.
Over 460,000 people annually die of a disorder called sudden cardiac death, according to CDC statistics. This condition strikes otherwise healthy people who have experienced no obvious symptoms of heart disease prior to their abrupt deaths.
An alarming number young athletes are included in these deaths, in high schools and colleges as well as among professional athletes. While in some of these individuals cardiologists found evidence of coronary disease and scars from earlier silent heart attacks, there is one mechanism that's getting no attention at all: the excitotoxin damage caused by food additives and the artificial sweetener aspartame. This is despite growing evidence that the excitotoxic mechanism plays a major role in cardiac disease.
Previously, it was thought that excitotoxic food additives, such as monosodium glutamate and aspartic acid in aspartame, cause their damage in the cardiovascular centers in the brain stem and/or by over-stimulating sympathetic centers in the hypothalamus of the brain. Both mechanisms have resulted in sudden cardiac death in experimental animals.
A particularly deadly combination occurs in young athletes: Low magnesium intake, high calcium intake, low intake of omega-3 fatty acids and excitotoxins in food additives. Strenuous exercise, especially in extreme heat, depletes the body's magnesium stores, as does consumption of carbonated drinks and taking calcium supplements. Also adrenalin secretion, increased during exercise, intensifies heart muscle irritability and further loss of magnesium as well. When calcium supplements are taken in the face of an existing magnesium deficiency, both magnesium and calcium are driven into the bones, producing a sudden magnesium-depletion crisis.
Low magnesium produces seizures and causes sudden cardiac arrest. In a classic experiment it was found that stressing magnesium-deficient animals resulted in an almost 100% mortality from sudden cardiac arrest. Adding magnesium reduced mortality dramatically. A considerable body of evidence has shown that low omega-3 fat intake significantly increases the risk and severity of cardiac arrhythmias, the main cause of sudden cardiac death.
A number of studies have shown that Americans are significantly deficient in these protective fats. Finally, recent research has shown that the brain is not the only tissue having glutamate receptors. Numerous glutamate receptors have been found both within the heart's electrical conduction system and the heart muscle itself.
When an excess of food-borne excitotoxins, such as MSG, hydrolyzed protein soy protein isolate and concentrate, natural flavoring, sodium caseinate and aspartate from aspartame, are consumed, these glutamate receptors are over-stimulated, producing cardiac arrhythmias. When magnesium stores are low, as we see in athletes, the glutamate receptors are so sensitive that even low levels of these excitotoxins can result in cardiac arrhythmias and death.
This is especially so when combined with the other factors mentioned. Under such condition, free radicals and lipid eroxidation products build up within the muscle cells, leading to the same outcome.
High consumption of aspartame adds an additional cardiac muscle toxin: methanol. A number of studies have shown that consuming aspartame and MSG (and similar excitotoxins) together greatly magnifies the toxicity.
Young people live on junk foods, most of which contain a number of excitotoxic additives. Several studies have shown that the levels consumed by our youth equal those that cause damage in experimental animals. Humans are 5X more sensitive to these toxins than any animal.
The same factors operate in older individuals. Most people over age 50 years are depleted of magnesium, have low omega-3 fat intakes, are under stress and take a number of medications which compromise nutrition, especially magnesium levels. Because seniors are more likely to have coronary artery disease plus other medical conditions, their risk of sudden cardiac death is even higher.
Both athletes and those over age 45 should take magnesium supplements, antioxidants, omega-3 oils, eat more vegetables and avoid foods and artificial sweeteners containing excitotoxins such as aspartame and MSG. This accomplishes a lot more than attempting to rescue a victim with an external defibrillator after the fact.
Dr. Blaylock's web site is http://www.russellblaylockmd.com . He is author of "Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills and Health & Nutrition Secrets to Save Your Life." He can be seen in the movie on aspartame, "Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World." http://www.docworkers.com
Case histories now being taken on aspartame and brain tumors from New York, New Jersey, Illinois and Mississippi in the last three years. Send to BettyM19@mindspring.com Also, The FDA blamed deaths on ephedra and removed it from the market. The FDA records on ephedra were reviewed by the renowned neuroscientist Dr. John Olney who founded the field of neuroscience called excitotoxicity and tried to prevent the approval of aspartame and said ephedra is safe. http://www.wnho.net
In the movie, "Sweet Misery," Diane Fleming is interviewed from prison. Her husband, an aspartame addict, who played basketball several times a week, died and she was charged with his death. Several experts have written affidavits that Charles Fleming died from aspartame.
http://www.wnho.net/aspartamenews.htm
Dr. Betty Martini
Founder, Mission Possible International
9270 River Club Parkway
Duluth, Georgia 30097
770-242-2599
Aspartame Toxiocity Center: http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame
Aspartame Information List: http://www.wnho.net
Aspartame-Rumsfeld's Bioweapon Legacy
Dr. Betty Martini, Founder
Mission Possible Intl
8-20-5
http://www.rense.com/general67/rum.htm
Before reading this article everyone should hear James Turner, Atty, explain how Don Rumsfeld called in his markers to get aspartame, a deadly chemical poison approved when the FDA said no: http://www.soundandfury.tv/pages.Rumsfeld2.html The entire film can be gotten at http://www.docworkers.com
Among the many ironies of our modern world is that Gerald Ford awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom-America's highest civilian honor-to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on January 19, 1977. Just a few weeks later on March 8, Rumsfeld became the CEO of G.D. Searle to take point on a mission to force the Food and Drug Administration to approve for human consumption a known carcinogen and neurotoxic poison.
Mission accomplished: Today some 9,000 commonly consumed products are laced with this weapon of mass misery and millions of people live with chronic illnesses linked to the artificial sweetener aspartame. It is our belief at The Idaho Observer that if some guy named Parkinson can have a disease named after him, then Donald Rumsfeld ought to have his own disease, too. Hence the term Rumsfeld disease A.
Rumsfeld's Disease
A Politically-Induced Biochemical
Disaster Of Global Proportions
By Don Harkins
The Idaho Observer
8-15-5
Today, Donald Rumsfeld is known throughout the world as the zealous U.S. Secretary of Defense who is waging a global "war on terror" in search of "terrorists" and "weapons of mass destruction." Most people, however, are not aware that Rumsfeld himself unleashed a chemical weapon of mass destruction upon the world in 1981-and it's still out there destroying people all over the world. That "WMD" is aspartame and it has been scientifically and anecdotally linked to millions of chronic illnesses and deaths.
The evidence shows that, with full knowledge of aspartame's neurotoxicity and carcinogenicity, Rumsfeld, as the CEO of G.D.
Searle, Co., "called in his markers" to achieve U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the artificial sweetener aspartame, better known by its trade name "NutraSweet."
Consumer advocate attorney Jim Turner, who was instrumental in the 1969 banning of cyclamate in the U.S. for its link to various forms of cancer, met with representatives of aspartame approval petitioner Searle in 1974. The main topic of discussion was neuroscientist Dr. John Olney's 1971 study which showed that aspartic acid caused lesions in the brains of infant mice. According to Turner, arguably the world's foremost authority on aspartame's dubious legal history, Rumsfeld was apparently hired by Searle for one specific purpose: To obtain FDA approval for aspartame.
Betty Martini is the director of Mission Possible, a worldwide consumer advocacy organization formed in 1992 as a voice for those demanding that the FDA reverse its approval of aspartame and order its removal from foods, beverages and medical preparations. Martini is even more bold in her charges against Rumsfeld. Martini believes the Washington insider, former three-term U.S. Rep. From Illinois (1962-1968), secretary of defense (1975-1977) and executive assistant to President Gerald Ford, was hired by Searle because, "He was willing to get a deadly chemical poison, aspartame, approved for human consumption"
Background
In December, 1965 Searle chemist James Schlatter discovered aspartame while working on an ulcer drug. The substance, comprised of 50 percent synthetic phenylalanine, 40 percent synthetic aspartic acid and 10 percent methanol, was about 200 times sweeter than sugar by weight and had no calories. By spring, 1967, Searle began conducting safety trials in preparation for petitioning the FDA for product approval.
Soon after the trials began, lab animals (monkeys and mice) began experiencing adverse effects ranging from brain lesions and tumors to seizures and death. Yet Searle petitioned the FDA for aspartame approval in February, 1973. According to Turner, Searle provided the FDA with over 100 studies claiming they proved aspartame was "safe." Independent analyses of these studies, however, proves conclusively that aspartame is actually a dangerous, neurotoxic, carcinogenic and highly-addictive drug.
Trusting Searle's promise that aspartame was safe, the FDA approved the limited use of aspartame in dry goods on July 26, 1974. Turner and Dr. Olney formally objected to the approval. Their petition triggered an FDA investigation of Searle's lab practices which proved that Searle had provided the FDA with inaccurate conclusions resulting from manipulated data derived from poorly-designed studies. The FDA reversed its decision to approve aspartame in dry goods.
On January 10, 1977, the FDA formally requested that the U.S. Department of Justice convene a federal grand jury to determine if Searle should be criminally indicted for "concealing material facts and making false statements" with regard to its petition for aspartame approval.
Among the many charges FDA investigators made about Searle's shoddy lab practices was how rats that developed tumors would undergo surgical removal of the tumors and then be placed back into the study as if nothing had happened to them.
The grand jury investigation was led by U.S. Attorney Samuel Skinner. In July 1, 1977, while the investigation was being conducted, Skinner left the Justice Department and took a job with Sidley & Austin-the law firm representing Searle. The statute of limitations eventually ran out and the grand jury disbanded without reaching any conclusions regarding Searle and its lab practices.
Amid this controversy, Rumsfeld was hired as Searle CEO on March 8, 1977 and immediately began cleaning house. Rumsfeld, who had no previous business executive experience before becoming CEO of Searle, reorganized several departments in the company and fired many of its high-level managers, replacing them with other politically-connected Washington, D.C., insiders.
Though the controversies deepened and the evidence proving the poisonous nature of his company's product continued to accumulate, Rumsfeld and his team continued to push for FDA approval of aspartame.
A team of FDA investigators headed by Jerome Bressler attempted to block Rumsfeld, et. al, by publishing what has become known as the "Bressler Report" on August 1, 1977. The report cited several instances where Searle intentionally mislead the FDA in its petition for marketplace approval of aspartame. The FDA then formed a public board of inquiry (PBOI) in 1979 to rule on the myriad safety issues surrounding aspartame.
By this time, FDA investigators and independent scientists had exhaustively reviewed the Searle studies and additional studies had been conducted. There was no doubt, based upon objective analyses of evidence that had accumulated for over a decade, that aspartame was deathly poisonous to lab animals and caused a statistically significant number of them to develop tumors.
On September 30, 1980, the PBOI concluded that aspartame should not be approved pending further investigation of its link to the formation of brain tumors and that the FDA "has not been presented with proof of reasonable certainty that aspartame is safe for use as a food additive."
The coup
Ronald Reagan was sworn in as president January 21, 1981. Rumsfeld, while still CEO at Searle, was part of Reagan's transition team. This team hand-picked Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes, Jr., to be the new FDA commissioner. Dr. Hayes, a pharmacologist, had no previous experience with food additives before being appointed director of the FDA. He, like Rumsfeld, did, however, have experience with chemical warfare studies while connected to the Department of Defense. According to The Washington Post, Hayes was, "one of a number of doctors who conducted drugs tests for the Army on volunteers. to determine the effect of a mind-disorienting drug called CAR 301,060," at Fort Detrick, Maryland.
The Post further explained why Hayes was the perfect choice to politically force the approval of aspartame: "According to a declassified 1976 report prepared by the Army Inspector General, Hayes had planned a research study to develop the mind-altering CAR 301,060 as a crowd control agent."
The report, detailing Hayes activities beginning in 1972, further indicated that Hayes was involved in similar biochemical mind control research studies until being named FDA director.
One of Hayes, first official acts as FDA chief was to approve the use of aspartame as an artificial sweetener in dry goods July 18, 1981. In order to accomplish this feat, Hayes had to overlook the scuttled grand jury investigation of Searle, overcome the Bressler Report, ignore the PBOI,s recommendations and pretend aspartame did not chronically sicken and kill thousands of lab animals. Hayes, left his post at the FDA in November, 1983, amid accusations that he was accepting corporate gifts for political favors. Just before leaving office in scandal, Hayes approved the use of aspartame in beverages. According to The Post, Hayes, next job was in the private sector where he served as a high-paid senior medical advisor for Searle's public relations firm.
The aftermath
Within weeks of aspartame's approval for use in beverages, cans of diet sodas and other sweet drinks were on the market. To help sell Americans on using the artificial sweetener, intense advertising campaigns began programming the public to believe that sugar has lots of calories; calories make us fat and NutraSweet has no calories-therefore it won't make us fat.
Based upon this almost universally-accepted oversimplification of biochemical reality, aspartame has enjoyed 22 years of marketplace success and is now in an estimated 7,000 to 9,000 commonly-consumed products in at least 100 countries. When Searle was absorbed by Monsanto in 1985, Rumsfeld reportedly received a $12 million bonus.
Not surprisingly, the same adverse reactions seen in lab animals in the 60s and 70s are now being seen in the general population. In his first book on aspartame (1990), Dr. H.J. Roberts stated that in five or 10 years we would have a worldwide plague on our hands if we do not remove aspartame from our food supply. With the printing of "Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic (2001), Dr. Roberts declared that the world is, indeed, plagued by a global epidemic of symptoms associated with aspartame use.
* Aspartame is being identified by a growing number of researchers and physicians as an underlying cause of chronic ill health in America and other countries throughout the world.
* It interacts with other substances such as pharmaceutical drugs to produce adverse reactions.
* All metabolites of aspartame (formaldehyde, methanol, diketopiperazine and formic acid) are toxic to the human body and are especially toxic to the brain.
* Aspartame comprises over 80 percent of consumer complaints filed with the FDA.
* The FDA has generated a list of 92 symptoms associated with aspartame consumption that include nausea, dizziness, irritability, insanity, blindness, deafness, weight gain and death.
* The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention claim that 500,000 people each year simply "drop dead" for no apparent reason from what it labels "sudden cardiac death."
* Dementia among all ages (especially the elderly) and learning disabilities among children, in the U.S. and abroad, have been skyrocketing since 1981.
As of today, the number of scientific and studies showing that aspartame is, indeed, an underlying cause of chronic physical and mental illness and death out number studies proving its safety by at least 400 to zero. Proof of this fact can also be determined by what happens in many cases when people stop using aspartame: Their chronic symptoms disappear.
The legacy
Defense Secretary Rumsfeld was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Gerald Ford-the highest civilian honor in America-on January 19, 1977. A few months later, Rumsfeld became the CEO of Searle to secure political approval for a product that science had proven to be a highly-addictive neurotoxic drug that causes chronic ill health, brain tumors and death. The evidence indicates that FDA approval for aspartame was a high-level political priority undoubtedly connected to its capacity to adversely effect the minds and bodies of those consuming it.
Because Rumsfeld placed politics above public health and safety, hundreds of millions of people throughout the world cannot think clearly and suffer from a variety of chronic illnesses. It is, therefore, fitting that symptoms associated with aspartame use be known as "Rumsfeld's disease."
Caption: The search of a suitable picture of Donald Rumsfeld turned up this image from Portland Indy Media. Though it may seem satirical, is it? What goes through the mind of a man who knowingly poisons his own people?
End of Article
Note from Betty Martini:
Only yesterday in national news we learned diet and low calorie pop will be left in schools which will poison our children. As an example, Coke Zero has aspartame. Aspartame is a chemical hypersensitization agent because it is a neurotoxic drug/chemical poison. It not only interacts with all drugs but all vaccines and other toxins and unsafe sweeteners like Splenda, a chlorocarbon poison. So our children don't have a chance. Only a few weeks ago an epidemiological study by Sharon Fowler at the University of Texas based on 8 years data links diet drinks with obesity. Aspartame also can precipitate diabetes, simulates and aggravates diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy, destroys the optic nerve and interacts with insulin.
In July a 3 year Italian study was released by the European Foundation for Oncology and Environmental Sciences which revealed it causes leukemia, lymphoma and malignant brain tumors. Their July 14 05 report declares: "The results demonstrate ... that aspartame is a carcinogenic agent." How many mothers knowing this would want their children drinking an addictive carcinogenic agent. Aspartame liberates free methyl alcohol which causes chronic methanol poisoning. This affects the dopamine system of the brain and causes addiction. Now understand why the pop companies want this poison in your schools which causes Rumsfeld Disease.
Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D., one of the world's leading authorities on aspartame neurotoxicity, extensively reviewed the Soffritti report. "This study confirmed the previous study by Dr. Trocho and co-workers (l998), which also found the formaldehyde breakdown product of aspartame to be damaging to cellular DNA and that this damage was cumulative. The type of damage was a duplicate of that associated with cancers. These two studies strongly indicate that drinking a single diet cola sweetened with aspartame every day could significantly increase one's risk of developing a lymphoma or leukemia."
Dr. Blaylock said further "This study should terrify mothers and all those consuming aspartame sweetened products. This was a carefully done study which clearly demonstrated a statistically significant increase in several types of lymphomas and Leukemias in rats. Both of these malignancies have increased significantly in this country since the widespread use of aspartame."
Only the animals exposed to aspartame developed malignant brain tumors and we are now taking aspartame brain tumor cases for litigation in New York, New Jersey, Madison County, Illinois and Mississippi. Simply contact me at Bettym19@mindspring.com
Dr. Blaylock also said "They found that even lower doses of aspartame could cause these malignancies, yet the higher the dose, the more cancers that were seen. Since aspartame can increase obesity and may even cause the metabolic syndrome that affects 48 million Americans, there is no reason to ever consume this product. At the least, it should be immediately banned from all schools."
Any mother reading this article with children in school should immediately take this to their principal, children's teacher and PTA along with the movie, Sweet Misery, and demand that all products with aspartame (NutraSweet/Equal/Spoonful, E951/Canderel/Benevia, etc.) and especially pop with this poison be removed - period, no if's, no and's and no but's. And Board of Educations should also remove the lobbyists and those who would offer money to keep poisoned pop in schools. How much is the brain of your child worth. Remember this is the cause of the epidemic of ADD, ADHD, autism, Tourettes, and behavioral problems.
For documentation of this read the experts books:
Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic
H. J. Roberts, M.D.
or 1 800 827 7991
Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills and Health & Nutrition Secrets
By neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D.
Web sites: http://www.wnho.net and http://www.dorway.com Aspartame Toxicity Center, http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame
Aspartame Information List, http://www.wnho.net Get involved
Rumsfeld Disease may become one of the largest plagues in world history. The list of horrors is unending. Thanks to despicable and greedy Big Pharma/Codex, in England supplements from industry now contain aspartame. Diane Fleming still remains in a prison in Virginia because methanol was found on her husband's autopsy and they thought she poisoned him even though she passed their lie detector test. Doctors affidavits state he died from aspartame which causes methanol poisoning. Athletes like Fleming are dying because aspartame damages the cardiac conduction system and causes sudden death, although his was not sudden.
Enough is enough. Eradicate Rumsfeld Disease from our schools and from our planet.
Don Harkins of the Idaho Observer has given permission to have this republished. To help the effort the Idaho Observer - www.idaho-observer.com publishes 24 page booklets for distribution on Rumsfeld Disease called the Artificially Sweetened Times. Distribute them throughout your schools, offices and churches to help eradicate Rumsfeld Disease. And if you think the pop companies didn't know the gum was loaded be sure to read the protest of the National Soft Drink Assn. on www.dorway.com
Dr. Betty Martini, Founder
Mission Possible International
9270 River Club Parkway,
Duluth, Georgia 30097
770 242-2599
Idaho Observer
Spirit Lake, Idaho 83869
Phone 208-255-2307
Email observer@coldreams.com
Aspartame And Fluoride Bone Cancer Coverup
From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
Saturday, July 30, 2005
Dear Taylor,
I would be more than happy to put this on my lists for you. You are right, I know about fluoride and if you will go to http://www.dorway.com you will see Dr. Russell Blaylock's paper on the interaction of aspartame, MSG, fluoride and RBGH. It's discussed also in the doctor's books. I'll send you another post by private email of recent press releases that will have all the resources.
We also have an Aspartame Information List you can subscribe to on http://www.wnho.net And I'll see if I can get this put on some web sites.
All my best,
Betty
Dear Dr. Martini,
As I have taken note that you are also not a supporter of forced artificial fluoridation of municipal water sources, I want to call something to your attention, even though it's likely you already know.
Recently a Harvard Oral Epidemiologists was caught red-handed covering up the very negative results of a fluoridation/bone cancer connection to boys between the ages of 5 to 10.
This dental researcher reported to federal officials and the National Academy of Sciences that there was no connection between drinking fluoridated water and osteosarcoma, a rare bone cancer in males. However, this same individual, as supervisor and advisor to a key PhD student studying this problem, signed off in 2001 on the epidemiological work carried out by the doctoral subordinate that showed a robust correlation between drinking fluoridated water and much higher rates of osteosarcoma in boys.
In fact, this cover-up on the part of an esteemed dental researcher has recently hit the mainstream press, some of which can be easily accessed from the home page of www.fluorideaction.net or www.fluoridealert.org . (Warning: don't type in fluoridealert.com , because doing so routs you to the ADA).
The reason that I am contacting you is to encourage you to mention something about this cover-up in any of your online submissions.
Thank you for all of your work on behalf of the public through your drive to educate consumers about the awful truth regarding aspartame. There will be reason to celebrate if the tragedy of aspartame and water fluoridation ends some day.
Sincerely,
Mr. Taylor Moore
The Cause Of The Enormous Diabetes Epidemic
From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum
Wednesday, July 27, 2005
Dear Dr. Fairchild:
The article below quoting you was forwarded to me by Mission Possible UK. We're a global volunteer force warning all consumers off the deadly neurotoxin, aspartame, marketed as NutraSweet, Equal, Spoonful, E951,Canderel, etc. This is the answer to the epidemic of diabetes. First of all, aspartame is reportedly used by 70% of the US population and 40% of the children. It's not an additive but a deadly neurotoxin that can precipitate diabetes, simulates and aggravates diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy, keeps blood sugar out of control, destroys the optic nerve, causes diabetics to go into convulsions and even interacts with insulin. This is the recipe to kill a diabetic. A report recently spoke of 65% of diabetics already having Alzheimer's. Diabetic specialist and world expert on aspartame, H. J. Roberts, M.D., says aspartame is escalating Alzheimer's (Defense Against Alzheimer's Disease, www.sunsentpress.com ). Indeed memory loss is so prevalent that it is #9 on the FDA list of 92 symptoms you will find on www.dorway.com
Aspartame is a molecule of three ingredients, aspartic acid, (40%), an excitotoxin, a methyl ester which immediately becomes methanol (10%), and phenylalanine (50%) which as an isolate is a neurotoxin, goes directly into the brain, lowering the seizure threshold and depleting serotonin. Lowered serotonin triggers manic depression or bipolar, suicidal tendencies, mood swings, insomnia, hallucinations, panic attacks, etc. The molecule breaks down to a witches brew of toxins including diketopiperazine, a brain tumor agent.
An Italian Study (3 years) just recently released on aspartame proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that aspartame is a carcinogen. It caused malignant brain tumors, leukemia and lymphoma. You can read the entire study on http://www.wnho.net click on aspartame.
This product liberates free methyl alcohol which converts to formaldehyde and formic acid even in the retina of the eye and destroys the optic nerve. It triggers in victims everything from retinal detachments and optic neuritis to macular degeneration and blindness. The late Dr. Morgan Raiford who was the "the specialist in methanol toxicity" in this country tried desperately before his death to get aspartame removed from the market. He said if vision is in the "wet stage" it can return and, indeed, in many we have warned in time who were legally blind, we have seen their vision return. So when a diabetic goes blind, the physician may think, well he's a diabetic so he went blind. But the cause most of the time is aspartame in those who use it. It's a given. To make matters worse aspartame is very addicting. The methanol causes chronic methanol poisoning. This effects the dopamine system of the brain and causes the addiction. A report on addiction and aspartame can be read on www.dorway.com In l986 the Community Nutrition Institute in Washington, D.C. petitioned the FDA to ban aspartame because so many people were going blind and having seizures. The FDA refused.
Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D., author of Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, www.russellblaylockmd.com wrote a paper on sudden cardiac death explaining that aspartame damages the cardiac conduction system and causes this. You can also read this on www.wnho.net Aspartame triggers an irregular heart rhythm and interacts with all cardiac medication. In fact, because it damages the mitochondria or life of the cell it also interacts with all drugs and vaccines. You can now understand why the athletes are dropping dead. One athlete and body builder who played basketball three or four times a week was addicted to aspartame laced diet drinks and other products. His autopsy showed methanol poisoning. Even though his wife took a lie detector test and the police admitted she was truthful and didn't kill her husband she was indicted and sentenced to 50 years in prison, 20 and 30 to be served concurrently. You can hear her story in the documentary on aspartame, Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World, www.docworkers.com
In this movie you will also see Doctors H. J. Roberts and Russell Blaylock.
Dr. Roberts realized aspartame was a poison when it was approved because his diabetic patients began going blind, being confused and their blood sugar could not be controlled. He testified before Congress and in his first press conference said if something was not done then in 5 or 10 years we would have a global plague on our hands. Indeed, it was Dr. Roberts who declared aspartame disease to be a global epidemic and published the 1038 page medical text on it. Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, www.sunsentpress.com or 1 800 827 7991. In this masterpiece you can read exactly the mechanisms by which aspartame destroys the diabetic.
The FDA never wanted to approve this poison and even attempted to have the original manufacturer indicted for fraud. Both U.S. Prosecutors hired on with the defense team and the statute of limitations expired. The FDA refused for 16 years to allow aspartame on the market but at the time Don Rumsfeld was CEO of Searle and said he would call in all his markers and get it approved anyway. See and hear the incredible story of how that was done in the movie, Sweet Misery, as told by James Turner, Washington Atty. Turner along with Dr. John Olney attempted to prevent the approval of aspartame.
And as to obesity, we have a saying: "If you want to get fat NutraSweet is where its at." The Trocho study has proven that the formaldehyde converted from the methanol accumulates in the cells and damages DNA with most toxicity in the liver but substantial amounts in the adipose tissue (fat cells), kidneys, brain and retina. In the protest of the National Soft Drink Association you will read that aspartame is really a drug that makes you crave carbohydrates so you gain weight. It's on www.dorway.com This is an affidavit by Dr. Wurtman at MIT. Dr. Wurtman was threatened by the VP of Searle if he did studies on aspartame and seizures his research funds would be rejected, and they were. But today MIT gets research funds and Dr. Wurtman no longer speaks out against aspartame. He was, however, a tiger in Congress and left a paper trail he can't destroy. However, MIT has now withdrawn his book, and they are probably trying to get it off the market.
Likewise, the manufacturers fund the professional organizations like the American Diabetes Assn and American Dietetics Assn and they push their propaganda with full knowledge of the toxicity of aspartame. Those responsible to solve the problem are the problem. We walk with the diabetics at the diabetic walk sponsored in part by Equal and give out material to save their lives. See Dr. Roberts position paper on aspartame and diabetes and hypoglycemia on www.dorway.com One year I met a young girl addicted to Diet Coke wearing an insulin pump. I finally told her I would give her a doctors packet on the toxin if she would agree to abide by what her physician told her. Most physicians have no knowledge because so many are funded by the manufacturer who could alert the medical community. Hospitals are full of this toxin. Instead the young girl gave the packet to the ADA.
Dr. Roberts practiced medicine for 50 years graduating medical school when he was about 21. He's a brilliant physician who was selected at the Best Doctor in the US in the l980's. His first text on medical diagnosis was used by 60,000 doctors, especially to prepared for their Board examinations. You only have to take your Boards once and its a compliment to a physician if he does it again years ago to show he is current with medicine. Dr. Roberts is Board Certified and Recertified in Internal Medicine. The ADA saw that on his stationery and actually told the young girl I was trying to get off aspartame that it meant he had lost his license. That's how far these professional organizations will go to keep being funded by industry. They simply sacrifice the consumer.
There are front groups all over the Internet that lie and deny. It's awfully hard to find a virgin in a domicile of illicit pleasures.
The aspartame obesity issue has now been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. Sharon Fowler's study (University of Texas) just recently released has proven diet drinks link to obesity using 8 years of data. The sweetener in those drinks all these years has been aspartame, Diet Coke and Diet Pepsi. In the Italian aspartame study release on www.wnho.net you can click on WebMD to read this.
On Fox News Sunday, Dr. Isadore Rosenfeld, reported the Italian study on aspartame while Michael Jacobson of CSPI actually said there should be warnings on soda pop, one to drink diet soda. We've written him too for years. Makes no difference how much data you give him he still pushes diet soda. CSPI stands for Center for Science in the Public Interest. They ought to call it NSANPI, No Science And No Public Interest. It's absolutely sickening.
And diabetics and the rest of the world needs to be warned about Splenda going into diet drinks because it is a chlorocarbon poison. See the report on www.wnho.net The Lethal Science of Splenda.
Dr. Fairchild, everything is a matter of public record. We are now taking case histories for aspartame brain tumors in New York, New Jersey, Mississippi, and Madison County, Illinois. The diabetes and obesity epidemics are now explained. See if you can get the FDA to explain their loyalty to industry. I filed a Citizens Petition to the FDA over 3 years ago based on the fact I have their records showing aspartame to be a chemical poison and they continue to lie to the public. The law states they have to answer in 180 days. When asked why they hadn't answered they said they had more important things to do. And so diabetics as well as other consumers continue to be disabled by aspartame and I shudder to think of the amount of deaths from the symptoms and diseases it triggers. We are looking at what may be one of the largest plagues in world history! While Big Pharma now wants our supplements, the only thing we have to fight the diseases they cause.
Respectfully,
Dr. Betty Martini,
Founder, Mission Possible International
9270 River Club Parkway, Duluth, Georgia 30097
770 242-2599
http://www.wnho.net and http://www.dorway.com
Big Brother Wants To Be Diet Cop
Wired News
July 25, 2005
http://wired.com/news/medtech/0%2C1286%2C68301-2%2C00.html?tw=wn_story_page_next1
(AP) -- At least half a million New Yorkers have diabetes, many of them at risk for blindness, kidney failure, amputations and heart problems because they are doing a poor job of controlling their illness. The question is, how much privacy are they willing to give up for a chance at better health?
A century after New York became the first American city to track people with infectious diseases as a way to halt epidemics, officials here propose a similar system to monitor people with diabetes, a non-contagious foe. Conceived after a sharp rise in diabetes deaths over the past 20 years, the plan would require medical labs to report to the city the results of a certain type of test that indicates how well individual patients are controlling their diabetes.
"There will be some people who will say, 'What business of the government is it to know that my diabetes is not in control?'" said Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, the city's health commissioner. The answer, he said, is that diabetes costs an estimated $5 billion a year to treat in New York and was the fourth leading cause of death in the city in 2003, killing 1,891.
By pinpointing problem patients, then intervening ever so slightly in their care, Frieden said the city can improve thousands of lives. "I don't think we can afford not to do anything," he said. The Board of Health vote on the proposal isn't likely until at least September, but it has already attracted attention from other public health experts and privacy advocates.
The list of illnesses reported to public health authorities has grown over the years, but it still is almost entirely contagious diseases, like HIV, or conditions related to environmental toxins, like lead poisoning. Diabetes is different, threatening no one but the people who have it.
"This isn't smallpox," said James Pyles, an attorney who represents health-care groups concerned with medical privacy. "The state, or the city in this case, does not have a compelling interest in the health of an individual that overrides that individual's right to privacy." Pyles praised the intent of the program, but said unless diabetics are asked for their consent, it would be "an outright violation of the constitutional right to privacy" for the government to obtain their identities.
The city's program wouldn't initially get consent to collect data, but would allow patients to opt out later. The database would also be tightly controlled, off limits to anyone but department staff, the patients and their doctors, health officials say.
Over time, doctors could receive letters, telling them whether their patients have been getting adequate care. People who skip checkups might get a note from their doctors, reminding them of the dangers of untreated diabetes.
The plan is akin to the surveillance system put in place in 1897 to fight tuberculosis. At first, doctors were outraged they had to report TB cases to the government, but it became a model after deaths plummeted. The American Diabetes Association supports New York's plan. It could be a great tool for doctors who find it difficult to track patients over long periods, said the ADA's Dr. Nathaniel Clark. Currently, he said, people who aren't aggressive about their care can easily fall through the cracks. Some switch health-care providers, and many people living in poor neighborhoods where diabetes is common don't have a regular doctor.
Dr. Paul Simon, of Los Angeles County's public health department, said other big cities could follow New York's lead. "Some people are uncomfortable with public health departments expanding their scope beyond infectious disease, but I would say we have to do it," he said. "Chronic disease really accounts for the major portion of years of life lost to illness these days." New York's program would involve collecting the results of A1c tests, which indicate blood glucose control over a few months, unlike the daily glucose tests diabetics give themselves.
The A1c test is given for both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, the latter linked to obesity and accounting for about 90 percent of American diabetics. The program would cost between $1 million and $2 million a year, the health department said. Dr. Amy Fairchild, an expert on public health ethics at Columbia University, said disease-monitoring programs have historically been able to overcome privacy worries if the health threat is sufficiently frightening.
"We respond with surveillance when we believe something has reached epidemic proportions," Fairchild said. "And this may fit the profile. Have we become a nation of obese people who are all going to get diabetes?" The program's success, she said, may depend partly on how patients respond. "It's not necessarily that someone has that information. It's that they're pestering you: 'The next thing I know, you'll be telling me what I can and can't eat,'" she said.
Nationally, diabetes is the sixth leading cause of death, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It afflicts about 18.2 million Americans. Sandye Poitier-Johnson, 57, a public school principal in Harlem who was diagnosed with diabetes a few years ago, said most people could use help monitoring their condition. "People say diabetes is serious, but they don't take it seriously," she said. "I wouldn't think that this was Big Brother or Big Sister watching me. I would welcome the help." She urged the city, though, to get patient consent first. "There is enough privacy invasion already in our society," she said.
Kentucky Aspartame Death Capital Of The US
From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum
Wednesday, July 27, 2005
The letter below is from Sharon Bevins, Mission Possible, Pound, Virginia. An extremely interesting point is she says leukemia should be included in the diseases triggered by aspartame, not knowing that the Italian Study has just proven the point. Here is her research: Regards, Betty
My name is Sharon Bevins, Mission Possible Pound, Virginia. I have been an elementary teacher in Wise County, Virginia for twenty-four years. I have been interested in nutrition for years, solely to obtain better health for myself. I had gone through a traumatic divorce in l980 and ate very little food during this time. About the time I started a teaching career, I came down with various ailments such as asthma, chronic fatigue, chronic sinusitis, nasal polyps, etc. After being kept on steroids for several years by regular doctors, I decided there had to be a better way. I found a regular doctor in Marion, Virginia that practiced alternative methods. He put me on a strict diet of nothing but limited meats, fruits, vegetables and water. Basically, what I was doing was a low glycemic diet, getting all of the toxins and poisons out of my body. He also put me on an anti-yeast regimen and put me on some good high powered vitamins and minerals. Within two months every symptom I had left me, and I was completely well. Needless to say it took me years to adjust to a strict diet, but now I do know how to get well!
Two years ago, I met a couple of women at a natural health food store, that basically changed my life. They introduced me to a book called "Death by Diet" by a bio-chemist called Robert Barefoot. The book explained all the functions that calcium did in the body and that it could even prevent and cure cancer! I started giving some of this information out to my friends and relatives who were sick with various ailments, such as lupus, fibromyalgia, MS, different types of cancer. I noticed that almost all on my list were women! I wondered why?
I had read an article in a women's magazine that said that women were dying across America at twice the rate of men on almost every disease, especially autoimmune diseases. I started taking informed surveys across the region I lived in (southwest Virginia and eastern Kentucky), to see if I could come up with some answers. I knew that women were dieting all the time, this was obvious! I found they were not big meat eaters and milk drinkers like men, losing major sources of protein and calcium. The women at the health food store showed me a brochure about the damaging effects of aspartame in diet products. I knew it was bad, but I had no idea at the time just how bad!!
I started calling everyone on my list to ask if they drank diet soda. Every one of them did, except one or two. Could there be a connection? It seemed too coincidental. I stepped up my surveys to see just how prevalent the usage of diet sodas were in this area, and if all the symptoms on this brochure could be true!! What I discovered was astounding to say the least! A cold chill went over me. American was being poisoned on a national level!! How could this be? How could something so devastating be on the market?
I discovered regular doctors were recommending it, especially for diabetics. Every person I met that had diabetes, drank diet soda. They trusted their doctor and thought they were doing a good thing. Except all the ones I talked to, were so sick and their blood sugar was out of control. They were losing their eyesight, and attributing it to the diabetes. I began to suspect diet soda was causing the diabetes epidemic. Heavy people that you would think would have diabetes, that didn't drink diet pop, didn't have diabetes. Skinny people who should not have it, were drinking diet sodas and had diabetes. I started going back to every case in my hometown of people that had died prematurely, and subsequently found they were all heavy diet pop drinkers. Even my own best friend, who had died at age 47, seven years ago with diabetes complications. I was just now connecting the dots. Every case of cancer, big diet soda drinkers. The list goes on and on. (I wouldn't have believed it, if I had not been in the trenches working with so many people.)
I know it is not the factor in every case of sickness. Smoking and high sugar consumption plays a part. But diet soda consumption seem to be the major factor! I was seeing women miscarrying, doing everything they thought was healthy, but drinking diet sodas. I was seeing children that I taught that were slow learners, or irreparably brain damaged where they could learn nothing, after some investigation found that all the mothers had drunk diet soda when they were pregnant. I think this makes the baby be born with a compromised immune system, and the vaccinations are pushing them over the edge to autism, asthma, diabetes, cancer and death!! This would explain why many children escape the ill effects of the vaccines. Most women that I see that are very sick, are smokers and soda drinkers.
I believe I have added another disease to the 90 list of symptoms: leukemia, (of course, most of these diseases are aspartame poisoning, just misdiagnosed by regular doctors). I started noticing that all the cases in my hometown where people had been diagnosed with leukemia was connected to diet soda. Some were dead. Those that I could reach with my information were getting well. When I hear of a celebrity or world leader with a mysterious blood disorder, I automatically think: diet soda!! (MARTINI: See news release on the recent new studies on aspartame showing aspartame triggers leukemia, lymphoma and malignant brain tumors - http://www.wnho.net/new_aspartame_studies.htm )
Arafat was never really diagnosed with anything for sure, but I suspect it was diet soda. Whenever I see anyone with seizures, palsy, paralysis in the legs, this is what I suspect. I started questioning people in buggies that couldn't walk at various stores and guess what? All heavy diet pop users, almost without exception. (IN my research on aspartame, I discovered it destroyed the vitamin B complex, which controls the central nervous system). One particular man in my hometown that I graduated with, was so gaunt looking, palsied and almost near death, was on a feeding tube. It took me awhile, but I discovered he lived on diet sodas for years. My suspicions were true! One man, who had brain cancer, that I've been working with, is now beating the cancer, but his short term memory is gone!! The only liquid he put in his body was diet sodas for fifteen years!!!
I am finding that women are substituting milk, for diet soda. Certain patterns are emerging. They don't eat a good breakfast, they don't eat many fruits and vegetables, they don't drink milk, eat little meat, and are huge diet soda consumers. It is so addictive. I've met women who told me, it would have to kill them before they would give it up! It is their life!! I always tell them, it most assuredly will do so. One man I met was drinking sixteen to eighteen a day!! Needless to say, these people are all terribly sick. I am seeing some people who have drink it for years, and seem to be in good health. They are meat eaters, with the protein protecting them from the poison. A protein will kick out sugars, toxins, lessening the damage to the cells. It keeps the toxins from spiking the blood sugar.
I read an article a few years ago, about an adjoining county to mine, Harlan County, Ky. This area had the highest amount of autoimmune diseases in the nation, and I found out recently they had the highest rate of soda consumption, especially diet soda. No one has made the connection until now.
I met a nurse from this area that said MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS WAS RAMPANT. I have been trying to canvas this area and give out the brochures about the effects of aspartame poisoning. I feel like this problem is greater in this area of Appalachia than other parts of the nation, because of the poor diets of the people, and the high amount of cigarette consumption.
I have been to over 300 businesses, schools, libraries, hospitals, etc. with the information on aspartame. The message is getting out!! ....But knowing this information, I cannot stand idly by, and let people suffer and die needlessly when I know the answer. .------ All I know is that something drastic has to be done. I am doing my part!! "One person can change a lot" has always been my motto.
I am working on my degree in nutrition and have written a book called the Alternative Underground, with a special section on "What's Killing The Women?" I have people that are helping me give out these brochures, so hopefully I won't have to fight this problem alone. I am giving seminars in churches to spread the message. I pray that this research will sound the alarm across the nation to get this horrific poison off the market!!
_____
Note from Martini: Sharon Bevins is the new Mission Possible Pound Virginia. She did this research on her own. She was unaware that aspartame can precipitate diabetes, simulates and aggravates diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy, causes diabetics to go into convulsions, and interacts with insulin. Some reports say 65% of diabetics have Alzheimer's. Memory loss is #9 on the FDA list of 92 symptoms.
See http://www.wnho.net/whopper.htm
Dr. Betty Martini, Founder, Mission Possible International, 9270 River Club Parkway, Duluth, Georgia 30097 770 242-2599 http://www.wnho.net and http://www.dorway.com
Aspartame Proven To Cause Cancer
From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
Director - Mission Possible
Thursday, July 21, 2005
A three year Italian study on Aspartame in rats revealed a connection between the artificial sweetener and leukemia, lymphoma and malignant brain tumors. It conclusively * proved * that aspartame is a carcinogen, say the study's authors.
A famous neurosurgeon calls for the complete removal of aspartame-laden products from all schools. These claims completely refute and destroy those of Aspartame manufacturers. -- Betty Martini
ATLANTA (PRWEB) -- The European Ramazzini Foundation of Oncology and Environmental Sciences Cancer Research Centre in Bologna, Italy, just released their three year study confirming the link between aspartame and lymphomas and Leukemias.
The report by Morando Soffritti "Aspartame induces lymphomas and Leukemias in rats" is in the European Journal of Oncology for July, 2005. Dr. Soffritti and his team carefully set the conditions whereby genetically-uniform test rats were treated equally with the exception of being divided into groups given varying levels of the toxic chemical sweetener.
Rats are deemed appropriate subjects for testing aspartame on humans because both humans and rats metabolize the methyl ester in aspartame into methyl alcohol, then formaldehyde then formic acid - all deadly poisons. The carcinogenicity of substances in rats and mice is a consistent predictor of cancer risk in humans exposed to those substances.
The study commenced with 8 week old rats and continued until the last one died at 159 weeks. Their physical status and behavior were examined three times daily and detailed records of their growth were kept. Every two weeks each of the 3,600 rats were "clinically examined for gross changes." As each rat died, a complete autopsy was performed. Organs, tissues and bones were preserved for further study.
"In our experimental conditions, it has been demonstrated that APM [aspartame] causes a dose-related statistically significant increase in lymphomas and Leukemias in females at dose levels very near those to which humans can be exposed," the authors wrote in their conclusion. The number of cancers that developed in rats given zero aspartame was zero.
Increases of lymphomas and Leukemias at the lowest exposure level was 62 percent and "an increase in the incidence of these types of neoplasias was also observed in males exposed to the highest dose," as stated in the study.
Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, MD, one of the world's leading authorities on aspartame neurotoxicity, extensively reviewed the Soffritti report. "This study confirmed the previous study by Dr. Trocho and co-workers (1998), which also found the formaldehyde breakdown product of aspartame to be damaging to cellular DNA and that this damage was cumulative. The type of damage was a duplicate of that associated with cancers. These two studies strongly indicate that drinking a single diet cola sweetened with aspartame every day could significantly increase one's risk of developing a lymphoma or leukemia," Blaylock said.
"This study should terrify mothers and all those consuming aspartame sweetened products," he continued. "This was a carefully done study which clearly demonstrated a statistically significant increase in several types of lymphomas and Leukemias in rats. Both of these malignancies have increased significantly in this country since the widespread use of aspartame."
"They also found an increased incidence of malignant brain tumors, even though it was not statistically significant. This does not mean there is no association to brain tumors, since ONLY the animals exposed to aspartame developed the tumors. With children and pregnant women drinking the largest amount of diet colas, this puts their children at the greatest risk of developing one of these horrible diseases. Their found that even lower doses of aspartame could cause these malignancies, yet, the higher the dose, the more cancers that were seen," said Blaylock.
"Since aspartame can increase obesity and may even cause the metabolic syndrome that affects 48 million Americans, there is no reason to ever consume this product. At the least, it should be immediately banned from all schools," said Blaylock.
Aspartame was approved for use in dry goods in 1981 under extremely controversial circumstances. The artificial sweetener is currently found in more than 6,000 products-soft drinks, chewing gum, candy, desserts, table sweeteners and even pharmaceutical drugs and is responsible for more than 80 percent of consumer complaints filed with the FDA each year. The FDA itself has published a list of 92 potentially adverse reactions to aspartame that includes weight gain, blindness, chronic headaches, insanity and death.
Soffritti et al conducted this study because they wanted to determine whether or not the ADI for aspartame (50 and 40 milligrams per kilogram of body weight per day in the U.S. and Europe respectively) was an appropriate limit. Their report concludes with these words: "Results of our study call for urgent reexamination of permissible exposure level of aspartame in both food and beverages, especially to protect children."
Here comes the Whopper. Makers and sellers of aspartame tried to rebut this impeccable European research saying: "With billions of man-years of safe use, there is no indication of an association between aspartame and cancer in humans."
For the rest of the story go to: http://www.wnho.net/whopper.htm
For more information http://www.whno.net or http://www.dorway.com
Contact Information
Dr Betty Martini
MISSION POSSIBLE INTERNATIONAL
770 242-2599
Aspartame Induces Lymphomas, Leukemias In Rats
"Since the results of carcinogenicity bioassays in rodents,
mainly rats and mice, have been shown to be a consistent
predictor of human cancer risk15-17, the first results of our study
call for urgent re-examination of permissible exposure
levels of (Aspartame) APM in both food and beverages,
especially to protect children."
From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum
Thursday, July 14, 2005
"The occurrence of brain malignancies is shown in Table 3. Sparse malignant brain tumors were observed among males and females in the treated groups and none in the controls."
Mission Possible International is taking case histories on aspartame brain tumors in New York, New Jersey, Mississippi, and Madison County, Illinois. Contact Dr. Betty Martini: Bettym19@mindspring.com and web sites: http://www.wnho.net click on aspartame, http://www.dorway.com
Original studies - General topic
Eur. J. Oncol., vol. 10, n. 2, pp. 00-00, 2005 IN PRESS
Aspartame induces lymphomas and leukaemias in rats a
Morando Soffritti, Fiorella Belpoggi, Davide Degli Esposti, Luca Lambertini
Cancer Research Centre, European Ramazzini Foundation of
Oncology and Environmental Sciences, Bologna, Italy
Received 15.3.2005 - Accepted 11.4.2005
Research supported by European Ramazzini Foundation of
Oncology and Environmental Sciences, Bologna, Italy
Introduction
Aspartame (APM) is a widely used artificial sweetener consumed by hundreds of millions of people around the world1, 2. It is found in more than 6,000 products, including soft drinks, chewing gum, candy, yoghurt, tabletop sweeteners and some pharmaceuticals such as vitamins and sugar-free cough drops2.
Dietary surveys, performed among APM consumers, have shown that the average APM daily intake in the general population ranged from 2 to 3 mg/kg b.w. and was even more in children and pregnant women1. The Accept-
Summary
Aspartame, a widely used artificial sweetener, was administered with feed to male and female Sprague-Dawley rats (100-150/sex/group), 8 weeks-old at the start of the experiment, at concentrations of 100,000; 50,000; 10,000; 2,000; 400; 80 and 0 ppm. Treatment lasted until spontaneous death of the animals. In this report we present the first results showing that aspartame, in our experimental conditions, causes a statistically significant, dose-related increase in lymphomas and leukaemias in females. No statistically significant increase in malignant brain tumors was observed among animals from the treated groups as compared to controls. Eur. J. Oncol., 10 (2), 00-00, 2005 Key words: aspartame, artificial sweetener, carcinogenesis, rats, lymphoma, leukemia
Daily Intake (ADI) both in the US and in Europe is 50 and 40 mg/kg b.w., respectively1. In rodents and humans, APM is metabolized in the gastrointestinal tract into three constituents: aspartic acid, phenylalanine and methanol3.
Three long-term feeding carcinogenicity bioassays on APM were performed on rats, and one on mice, during the 1970s. Overall, the carcinogenicity studies were considered negative4, but it must be noted that these studies did not comply with the basic requirements which must nowadays be met when testing the carcinogenicity potential of a chemical or physical agent. Because of these limitations, we decided to perform a mega-experiment following the currently accepted Good Laboratory Practices. In the present paper we are reporting our first results on the incidence of haemolymphoreticular malignancies (lymphomas and leukaemias) and malignant brain tumors.
Materials and methods
The APM used was produced by NutraSweet and supplied by Giusto Faravelli S.p.A., Milan, Italy. As an active ingredient, its purity was more than 98%. To simulate an assumed daily intake by humans of 5,000; 2,500; 500; 100; 20; 4; or 0 mg/kg b.w., APM was added to the standard Corticella diet, used for 30 years at the laboratory of the Cancer Research Centre (CRC) of the European Ramazzini Foundation (ERF), at concentrations of 100,000; 50,000; 10,000; 2,000; 400; 80; or 0 ppm. APM-treated feed was administered ad libitum to Sprague-Dawley rats (100-150/sex/group), 8 weeks old at the start of the experiment, and the treatment lasted until spontaneous death. Control animals received the same feed without APM. The plan of the experiment is shown in Table 1. Male (M) and female (F) rats from the colony of the CRC were used. This colony of rats has been employed2 M. Soffritti, F. Belpoggi, D. Degli Esposti, et al.
IN PRESS
Table 1 - Long-term carcinogenicity bioassay on aspartame administered with feed supplied ad libitum to male (M) and female (F) Sprague-Dawley rats from 8 weeks of age until spontaneous death. Plan of the experiment.
Groups Animals Treatment
Number Age at start Sex No. Dose Duration
(weeks) ppm mg/kg b.w. a Human ADI
equivalent b
I 8 M 100
F 100 100,000 5,000 100X Life span
M+F 200
II 8 M 100
F 100 50,000 2,500 50X Life span
M+F 200
III 8 M 100
F 100 10,000 500 10X Life span
M+F 200
IV 8 M 150
F 150 2,000 100 2X Life span
M+F 300
V 8 M 150
F 150 400 20 0.4X Life span
M+F 300
VI 8 M 150
F 150 80 4 0.08X Life span
M+F 300
VII 8 M 150
F 150 0 - - Life span
M+F 300
a The daily assumption in mg/kg b.w. was calculated considering the average weight of a rat for the duration of the experiment as 400 g, and the average consumption of feed as 20 g per day, both for males and females b Considering the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of 50 mg/kg b.w. for humans for various experiments in the CRC Laboratory for nearly 30 years. Data are available on the tumour incidence among untreated Sprague-Dawley rats. These animals were monitored for feed, water consumption, and body weight, for their life span and, at death, underwent complete necropsy and histopathological evaluation (historical controls).
The experiment was conducted according to the Italian law regulating use of animals for scientific purposes 5. After weaning, at 4-5 weeks of age, the experimental animals were identified by ear punch, randomized in order to have no more than one male and one female from each litter in the same group, and housed in groups of 5 in makrolon cages (41x25x15 cm), with stainless-steel wire tops and a shallow layer of white wood shavings as bedding. The animals were kept in one single room, at 23 ± 2°C and 50-60% relative humidity.
Once a week for the first 13 weeks, then every two weeks until 110 weeks of age, the mean daily drinking water and feed consumption were measured per cage, and body weight individually. Body weight continued to be measured every 8 weeks until the end of the experiment. Status and behaviour of the animals were examined 3 times daily, and they were clinically examined for gross changes every 2 weeks. All animals were kept under observation until spontaneous death.3
Aspartame, a leukaemogenic compound
IN PRESS
Fig. 1. Mean daily water consumption in male Sprague-Dawley rats
Fig. 2. Mean daily water consumption in female Sprague- Dawley rats
The biophase of the experiment terminated after 151 weeks, with the death of the last animal at the age of 159 weeks.
Upon death, the animals underwent complete necropsy. Histopathology was routinely performed on the following organs and tissues of all animals from each group: skin and subcutaneous tissue, mammary gland, the brain (3 sagittal sections), pituitary gland, Zymbal glands, salivary glands, Harderian glands, cranium (five sections, with oral and nasal cavities and external and internal ear ducts), tongue, thyroid, parathyroid, pharynx, larynx, thymus and mediastinal lymph nodes, trachea, lung and mainstem bronchi, heart, diaphragm, liver, spleen, pancreas, kidneys, adrenal glands, oesophagus, stomach (fore and glandular), intestine (four levels), urinary bladder, prostate, gonads, interscapular brown fat pad, subcutaneous and mesenteric lymph nodes and other organs or tissues with pathological lesions.
All organs and tissues were preserved in 70% ethyl alcohol, except for bones which were fixed in 10% formalin and then decalcified with 10% formaldehyde and 20% formic acid in water solution. The normal specimens were trimmed, following the Standard Operating Procedures at the CRC Laboratory: i.e. parenchymal organs were dissected through the hilus to expose the widest surface, and hollow organs were sectioned across the greatest diameter.4 M. Soffritti, F. Belpoggi, D. Degli Esposti, et al.
IN PRESS
Fig. 3. Mean daily feed consumption in male Sprague-Dawley rats
Fig. 4. Mean daily feed consumption in female Sprague-Dawley rats
Any pathological tissue was trimmed through the largest surface, including normal adjacent tissue. Trimmed specimens were processed as paraffin blocks, and 3-5 micron sections of every specimen were obtained. Sections were routinely stained with haematoxylin-eosin. Statistical analyses were performed using the poly-k test (k = 3). This test is a survival-adjusted quantal-response procedure that modifies the Cochran-Armitage linear trend test to take survival differences into account 6-8.
Results
During the experiment no differences were observed among the various groups in mean daily water consumption (figs. 1 and 2). A dose-related difference in feed consumption was observed between the various treated groups and the control group in both males and females (figs. 3 and 4). No differences in mean body weight were observed among treated and control groups in either males or females (figs. 5 and 6). No substantial difference in survival was observed among treated and control groups, males or females (figs. 7 and 8). Yellowing of the coat was observed in animals exposed to APM, mainly at the highest concentrations. This change was previously observed in our laboratory in rats exposed to formaldehyde administered with drinking water9. The occurrence of lymphomas and leukaemias among male and female rats in treated and control groups is5 Aspartame, a leukaemogenic compound
IN PRESS
Fig. 5. Mean body weights in male Sprague-Dawley rats
Fig. 6. Mean body weights in female Sprague-Dawley rats shown in Table 2. The data indicate that APM causes a statistically significant increase in the incidence of lymphomas and leukaemias in females, at concentrations of 100,000 (p= 0.01); 50,000 (p= 0.01); 10,000 (p= 0.05); 2,000 (p= 0.01) and 400 (p= 0.01) ppm as compared to untreated controls. This increase is dose-related (p= 0.05).
Although not statistically significant, an increase was also observed in females treated with 80 ppm and in males treated with the highest dose.
The haemolymphoreticular neoplasias observed in the experiment include: lymphoblastic lymphoma and leukaemia, lymphocytic lymphoma, lymphoimmunoblastic lymphoma, histiocytic sarcoma and monocytic leukaemia, myeloid leukaemia. The most frequent type of neoplasia was the lymphoimmunoblastic lymphoma (figs. 9 and 10). Lymphomas and leukaemias are considered together, since both solid and circulating phases are present in many lymphoid neoplasms, and distinction between them is artificial10.
The occurrence of brain malignancies is shown in Table 3. Sparse malignant brain tumours were observed among males and females in the treated groups and none in the controls. 6 M. Soffritti, F. Belpoggi, D. Degli Esposti, et al.
IN PRESS
Fig. 7. Survival in male Sprague-Dawley rats
Fig. 8. Survival in female Sprague-Dawley rats7
Aspartame, a leukaemogenic compound
IN PRESS
Fig. 9. Lymphoimmunoblastic lymphoma in a female rat administered
80 ppm aspartame in feed (lung). HE X 25
Fig. 10. A detail of the lymphoimmunoblastic lymphoma shown
in fig. 9. HE X 400
In our historical controls over the last 20 years, when we consider groups of 100 or more animals per sex (1934 males and 1957 females), the overall incidence of lymphomas and leukaemias in males is 21.8% (8.0-30.9) and in females 13.4% (7.0-18.4). The overall incidence of malignant brain tumours is 1.7% (0-5.0) in males and 0.7% (0-2.0) in females respectively.
Conclusions
In our experimental conditions, it has been demonstrated, for the first time, that APM causes a dose-related statistically significant increase in lymphomas and leukaemias in females at dose levels very near those to which humans can be exposed. Moreover, it can hardly be overlooked that at the lowest exposure of 80 ppm, there was a 62% increase in lymphomas and leukaemias compared to controls, even though this was not statistically significant. When compared to the concurrent control group, an increase in the incidence of these neoplasias was also observed in males exposed to the highest dose; even though not statistically significant, this observation confirms and extends the result in females.
The significance of the increase in haemolymphoreticular neoplasias is further reinforced by the following considerations, based on the results of experiments performed in the CRC laboratory.
These experiments demonstrate that the increase in lymphomas and leukaemias, observed in the APM study, could be related to methanol, a metabolite of APM, which is metabolized to formaldehyde and then to formic acid, both in humans and rats3. In fact we have shown that: 1) methanol administered in drinking water increased the in-8 M. Soffritti, F. Belpoggi, D. Degli Esposti, et al.
IN PRESS
Table 2 - Long-term carcinogenicity bioassay on aspartame administered with feed supplied ad libitum to male (M) and female (F) Sprague-Dawley rats from 8 weeks of age until spontaneous death.
Incidence of lymphomas and leukaemias
Group Animals Treatment Animals with No. lymphomas and leukaemias
Age at start Sex No. Dose Duration Number %
(weeks) ppm mg/kg b.w.a Human ADI
equivalent b
I 8 M 100 29 29.0
F 100 100,000 5,000 100X Life span 25 25.0**
M+F 200 54 27.0
II 8 M 100 20 20.0
F 100 50,000 2,500 50X Life span 25 25.0**
M+F 200 45 22.5
III 8 M 100 15 15.0
F 100 10,000 500 10X Life span 19 19.0*
M+F 200 34 17.0
IV 8 M 150 33 22.0
F 150 2,000 100 2X Life span 28 18.7*
M+F 300 61 20.3
V 8 M 150 25 16.7
F 150 400 20 0.4X Life span 30 20.0**
M+F 300 55 18.3
VI 8 M 150 23 15.3
F 150 80 4 0.08X Life span 22 14.7
M+F 300 45 15.0
VII 8 M 150 31 20.7
F 150 0 - - Life span 13 8.7
M+F 300 44 14.7
a Considering the life-span average weight of a rat (male and female) as 400 g and the average consumption of food as 20 g per day
b Considering the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of 50 mg/kg b.w. for humans
* Statistically significant p= 0.05; ** Statistically significant p= 0.01 using poly-k test (k = 3) cidence of lymphomas and leukaemias in female rats11; 2) the same effect was induced in females treated with the gasoline oxygenated additive methyl-tert-butyl-ether (MTBE), which is also metabolized to methanol12 ; and finally
3) an increase in the incidence of lymphomas and leukaemias was also observed in females treated with formaldehyde9, 13.
These results further highlight the important role that formaldehyde has on the induction of hematological malignancies in rodents. Moreover, in a recent reevaluation of the carcinogenicity of formaldehyde by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), strong, although not considered sufficient, evidence of an association with leukaemias in humans was found14.
Since the results of carcinogenicity bioassays in rodents, mainly rats and mice, have been shown to be a consistent predictor of human cancer risk15-17, the first results of our study call for urgent re-examination of permissible exposure levels of APM in both food and beverages, especially to protect children.
References
1. Butchko HH, Stargel WW, Comer CP, et al. Preclinical safety
evaluation of aspartame. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2002; 35:
S7-S12.
2. Aspartame Information Center. Available on http://www.aspartame.org , 2004.
3. Ranney RE, Opperman JA, Maldoon E, et al. Comparative metabolism
of aspartame in experimental animals and humans.
Toxicol Environ Health 1976; 2: 441-51.
4. Food and Drug Administration. Aspartame: Commissioner's Final
Decision; 1981 Fed Regist 46, 38285-308.
5. Repubblica Italiana. Decreto Legislativo 116. Attuazione della
direttiva n. 86/609/CEE in materia di protezione degli animali
9
Aspartame, a leukaemogenic compound
IN PRESS
Table 3 - Long-term carcinogenicity bioassay on aspartame administered with feed supplied ad libitum to male (M) and female (F) Sprague-Dawley rats from 8 weeks of age until spontaneous death.
Incidence of malignant brain tumours
Group Animals Treatment Animals with
Number malignant brain tumoursa
Age at start Sex No. Dose Duration Number %
(weeks) ppm mg/kg b.w.b Human ADI
equivalent c
I 8 M 100 1 1.0
F 100 100,000 5,000 100X Life span 1 1.0
M+F 200 2 1.0
II 8 M 100 2 2.0
F 100 50,000 2,500 50X Life span 1 1.0
M+F 200 3 1.5
III 8 M 100 0 -
F 100 10,000 500 10X Life span 1 1.0
M+F 200 1 0.5
IV 8 M 150 2 1.3
F 150 2,000 100 2X Life span 1 0.7
M+F 300 3 1.0
V 8 M 150 0 -
F 150 400 20 0.4X Life span 0 -
M+F 300 0 -
VI 8 M 150 2 1.3
F 150 80 4 0.08X Life span 1 0.7
M+F 300 3 1.0
VII 8 M 150 0 -
F 150 0 - - Life span 0 -
M+F 300 0 -
a The malignancies observed were: 10 malignant gliomas or mixed gliomas, 1 medulloblastoma, and 1 malignant meningioma
b Considering the life-span average weight of a rat (male and female) as 400 g and the average consumption of food as 20 g per day
c Considering the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of 50 mg/kg b.w. for humans
utilizzati a fini sperimentali o ad altri fini scientifici. Supplemento
ordinario alla Gazzetta Ufficiale 1992; 40: 5-25.
6. Bailer AJ, Portier CJ. Effects of treatment-induced mortality
and tumor-induced mortality on tests for carcinogenicity in
small samples. Biometrics 1988; 44: 417-31.
7. Portier CJ, Bailer AJ. Testing for increased carcinogenicity using
a survival-adjusted quantal response test. Fundam Appl
Toxicol 1989; 12: 731-7.
8. Piergorsh WW, Bailer AJ. Statistics for environmental biology
and toxicology. London: Chapman, 1997.
9. Soffritti M, Belpoggi F, Lambertini L, et al. Results of long-term
experimental studies on the carcinogenicity of formaldehyde
and acetaldehyde in rats. In Mehlman MA, Bingham E,
Landrigan PJ, et al. Carcinogenesis bioassays and protecting
public health. Commemorating the lifework of Cesare Maltoni
and colleagues. Ann NY Acad Sci 2002; 982: 87-105.
10. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Vardiman JW, et al. WHO Classification of
tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: Introduction.
In Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, et al. Tumours of haematopoietic
and lymphoid tissues. Lyon: IARC Press, 2001, 12-3.
11. Soffritti M, Belpoggi F, Cevolani D, et al. Results of long-term
experimental studies on the carcinogenicity of methyl alcohol
and ethyl alcohol in rats. In Mehlman MA, Bingham E, Landrigan
PJ, et al. Carcinogenesis bioassays and protecting public
health. Commemorating the lifework of Cesare Maltoni and
colleagues. Ann NY Acad Sci 2002; 982: 46-69.
12. Belpoggi F, Soffritti M, Maltoni C. Methyl-tertiary-butyl ether
(MTBE), a gasoline additive, causes testicular and lymphohaematopoietic
cancers in rats. Toxicol Ind Health 1995; 11:
119-49.
13. Soffritti M, Maltoni C, Maffei F, et al. Formaldehyde: an experimental
multipotent carcinogen. Toxicol Ind Health 1989;
5: 699-730.
14. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Monographs
on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to
humans. Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxy-
2-Propanol. Vol. 88 (in press). Available on http://www.iarc.fr .
15. Huff J. Long-term chemical carcinogenesis bioassays predict
human cancer hazards. Issues, controversies, and uncertainties.
In Bailer JA, Maltoni C, Bailar III JC, et al. Uncertainty in the
risk assessment of environmental and occupational hazards.
Ann NY Acad Sci 1999; 895: 56-79.
16. Tomatis L, Aitio A, Wilbourn J, et al. Human carcinogens so
far identified. Jpn J Cancer Res 1989; 80: 795-807.
17. Rall DP. Can laboratory animal carcinogenicity studies predict
cancer in exposed children? Environ Health Perspect 1995;
103 suppl 6: 173-5.
10
M. Soffritti, F. Belpoggi, D. Degli Esposti, et al.
More Information on aspartame -
Join the Aspartame Information List on http://www.wnho.net to keep up-to-date.
Dr. Betty Martini, Founder, Mission Possible International, 9270 River Club Parkway, Duluth, Georgia 30097 770 242-2599
You can contact Dr. Erik Millstone for more information (e.p.millstone@sussex.ac.uk) on this study.
Ritalin-Aspartame-Chromosome Damage - Killing Kids For Money
From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
Monday, July 04, 2005
What they should know about the aspartame connection:
1. Before the approval of aspartame (NutraSweet/Equal/Spoonful, E951, Canderel) there was no epidemic of Ritalin use or epidemic of learning disorders and behavioral problems. Renowned neuroscientist, Dr. John Olney, predicted what would happen to the brains of our children if aspartame was approved, especially in combination with MSG. He founded the field of neuroscience called excitotoxicity when he did studies on aspartic acid, (40% of aspartame) and found it caused lesions in the brains of mice. Aspartic acid is an excitotoxin, that stimulates the neurons of the brain to death causing brain damage. Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D., wrote the book on it, "Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills". www.russellblaylockmd.com Dr. Olney's report to the Board of Inquiry of the FDA explaining what would happen to the brains of our kids can be gotten on CD from Bob Flint, Mission Possible Maine, greatfalls@gwi.net It also has the Board of Inquiry report of the FDA that revoked approval of aspartame. Learn how it finally got approved by seeing the film Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World, www.docworkers.com . On the film Washington Attorney James Turner explains how Don Rumsfeld then CEO of G. D. Searle Co. called in his markers to get approval of a deadly neurotoxic drug masquerading as an additive. Mr. Turner along with Dr. John Olney tried to prevent approval.
2. Aspartame interacts with all anti-depressants and psychiatric medication including Ritalin, of course. Our children are medicated instead of educated. And aspartame triggers behavioral and psychiatric problems to begin with. The 50% phenylalanine as an isolate is neurotoxic and goes directly into the brain lowering the seizure threshold and depleting serotonin. Lowered serotonin triggers manic depression or bipolar, suicidal tendencies, mood swings, panic attacks - all types of behavioral and psychiatric problems. Aspartame knows no age. Time Magazine ran an article some years ago with bipolar on the cover. An epidemic of children have bipolar and why does this point to aspartame? Because children don't get bipolar, its an adult disease. Psychiatrist and medical director of the Safe Harbor Behavioral Health Center in Erie, Pennsylvania, Ralph Walton, M.D. has been concerned about the bipolar and aspartame connection for years and actually did a study on aspartame which can be found on http://www.wnho.net He was concerned if aspartame triggers depression what will it do to those already compromised with these types of problems. Monsanto who owned NutraSweet at the time told Dr. Walton they would supply the aspartame but changed their mind because they could not control the study, no doubt. In the study one subject suffered a retinal detachment while another had conjunctival bleeding. Many from the compromised group said they felt they were being poisoned. The institution stopped the study. Read Dr. Walton's research on scientific peer reviewed studies and funding. 92% of independent, unbiased research showed the problems, yet industry "controlled and financed studies" always said it was safe. This was discussed on 60 Minutes by Dr. Walton when Dr. Olney made world news about the aspartame/brain tumor association in l996. We are now taking aspartame brain tumor cases from New York, Madison County, Illinois, New Jersey and Mississippi for litigation. Aspartame breaks down to a brain tumor agent, diketopiperazine. You have only to read the Secret Trade Information, last paragraph on http://www.dorway.com to know the manufacturer knew it would do this and wanted it approved anyway. They mentioned they had to consider almost conversion to DKP and if they told the FDA they wouldn't get it approved. To check this out in humans Searle sacrificed people in poor villages in 6 countries. The studies showed that aspartame destroys the brain and central nervous system, and hardens the synovial fluids, according the horrific joint pain aspartame victims suffer. Some developed brain tumors and others seizures. Searle did not publish the findings but we have the sworn affidavit from the translator.
3. The July 2005 First For Women has the issue of aspartame and anxiety and irritability on the cover as an alert. On page 24 and 25 Dr. Walton is quoted as saying: "Just a sip of diet soda can bring on symptoms like headaches, sluggishness, anxiety, depression and irritability" .... Lorena Murray, our Mission Possible Hickory, N.C. is being interviewed and she can be seen in the movie, Sweet Misery. What the article didn't go into is that Lorena used aspartame during pregnancy and has aspartame affected children with learning and behavioral problems. This neurotoxin almost destroyed her life and family.
4. How can aspartame destroy families? Because of damage of the hypothalamus and mitochondria this neurotoxin triggers male sexual dysfunction and ruins female response. Being an endocrine disrupting drug it stimulates prolactin, changes the menses and causes infertility. This is discussed in detail in the medical text, Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, by H. J. Roberts, M.D., www.sunsentpress.com or 1 800 827 7991 There is also a report by biochemist, Dr. Madelon Price, who worked with Dr. John Olney for 30 years, and it can be found on http://www.dorway.com A Japanese Study some years ago also showed aspartame can cause infertility in the male, and the DNA damage. If a woman gets off aspartame and does get pregnant aspartame is an abortifacient, the reason for so many miscarriages. It is also a teratogen and triggers birth defects and mental retardation. And even if a live child is born it may have heinously damaged DNA for generations to come.
5. Has it been proven that aspartame causes these problems in children. Absolutely! Go to the Safe Harbor web site and read Miracle in Wisconsin . The ADD folks sponsored a program for the worst school in Wisconsin. All vending and soda pop machines were removed and the children were given nutritional food. At the end of the program this was the best school in Wisconsin with zero learning and behavioral problems. In September the ADD people, Feingold, banned aspartame.
Normally nobody would do a study on aspartame and children because after a quarter of a century we know without a shadow of a doubt how this aspartame destroys brains. In fact, some years ago a Norway University did a study and found aspartame destroys the brain, especially in the area of learning. However, a study was accidentally done in children by Dr. Baret of the Dominican Republic. Knowing that small children drinking milk could trigger diabetes, Dr. Baret changed their diet to replace milk with aspartame laced juice. It affected immediately almost all 360 children with anxiety, irritability, etc. Knowing the only thing he did was add aspartame to their diet he called. He then removed the aspartame laced juice and within 4 days all the children went back to normal. More information about this is in Dr. Roberts medical text, Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic.
6. Has DNA damage been proven? Beyond a shadow of a doubt. Dr. Russell Blaylock discussed the Trocho Study done in l998 in Barcelona to the Minneapolis Neuropathy Association in l999. He said: "A recent study by Trocho, Pardo and co-workers, have demonstrated that following aspartame ingestion, significant amounts of formaldehyde accumulate in the tissues. Formaldehyde is known to bind strongly to proteins and nucleic acids, forming adducts that are extremely difficult to eliminate through normal metabolic pathways.
"In this study, they demonstrated that labeled methanol ( as formaldehyde) accumulated in high concentrations in the liver (50%) and in lower, but substantial, concentrations in the kidney, adipose tissue, brain and retina. Within the cell, they found large amounts located within the DNA. It was interesting to note that these doses were lower than that used in toxicity studies. Previous studies have shown that very high doses of aspartame may not cause acute symptomalogy. This study indicates the damage may necessitate longer periods of time to manifest itself and that the eventual effects can be quite deleterious."
Having spoken to many people in the media who have tried to interview the researchers in Barcelona, I can tell you they won't be doing more studies on aspartame and they won't talk. They have been threatened. This is one of the damning scientific peer reviewed studies done on aspartame. When you damage DNA you can destroy humanity.
7. Why do not all physicians and consumers known the above information? Because of the most wicked propaganda. There are many front groups on the Internet like the Calorie Control Council who had the audacity to write the Miami Herald and with full knowledge push aspartame on pregnant women. See Dr. Blaylock's letter to the Miami Herald on http://www.wnho.net click on aspartame. Does the Miami Herald know aspartame is a deadly neurotoxin? Absolutely. They picked up propaganda from another front group two years earlier. They were written by physicians like Dr. Roberts and overwhelmed with aspartame victims testimonies. And since the front group was writing about me I sent them proof they were wrong. This had to do with lecturing for the World Environmental Conference and I even sent them my invitation to speak. In both cases the Miami Herald printed none of the letters nor did they write a retraction . They refused to tell me which reporter published the propaganda. Obviously since they were writing about me in the first place they should have contacted me, so intent was made clear. And while they said they would publish they did not showing they did not want the public to have the real facts. Shame on the Miami Herald. One caller reported a woman reading the propaganda in the Miami Herald got back on aspartame, had a grand mal seizure and died. Professional organizations also push the manufacturer's propaganda because they receive their funding. You could write a book on the propaganda mills and the lobbyists. Dr. Louis Elsas, Pediatric Professor, Genetics, testified before Congress about what aspartame and birth defects. His excellent testimony is on http://www.dorway.com and http://www.wnho.net
8. What you can do to help save the children. What is most important at the present time is that the Alabama Board of Education on July 12 will vote on a health plan for the Alabama schools to deal with obesity. And there are some that want to allow caffeinated diet drinks in the schools for 2005/06 school year. Keep in mind it's the diet drinks that cause obesity because of the aspartame and a new study has proven it. http://my.webmd.com/content/article/107/108476.htm
Also read Dr. Sandra Cabot's paper on http://www.dorway.com Aspartame Makes You Fatter and Dr. Ralph Walton's paper on Aspartame and Depression and Obesity. It also can precipitate diabetes, simulates and aggravates diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy and interacts with insulin as diabetic specialist H. J. Roberts, M.D., discusses in his medical text, Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic. The soft drink industry in Alabama is lobbying hard. We need everyone's help to stop them. Read the recent article below about lobbying:
The Junk Food Lobby Wins Again
By Michele Simon, AlterNet.
Posted June 17, 2005.
The junk-food industry's lobbyists are working hard to make sure sodas, candy and fast food are cheap and plentiful in the nation's schools. Tools
More stories by Michele Simon
On Tuesday, Connecticut Governor Jodi Rell vetoed what would have been the nation's strongest school-based nutrition law. With one stroke of the pen, she put to rest an extremely contentious three-year battle to rid Connecticut schools of soda and junk food.
Similar scenarios are being played out in state capitals all over the nation, where high-paid lobbyists of multi-national corporations such as Coca-Cola are swooping in to foil the efforts of local nutrition advocates, educators. With rising rates of childhood obesity and diabetes, state legislatures have become a major battleground over the sale of junk food in public schools.
Ironically, the most common argument made against such bills is that schools should maintain "local control" over nutrition policy. But Governor Rell's reasoning is hard to swallow. She invoked the word "local" no fewer than 16 times in her 3-page veto message. However, many school policies are made at the state and even national level. Perhaps the governor has heard of President Bush's "No Child Left Behind" policy?
But Rell is not alone. All over the country, politicians deep in the pockets of the junk food lobby are using the excuse of "local control" to defend their indefensible positions on school nutrition. Trouble is that local school districts are lured by the much-needed cash generated by soda and junk food sales. Yet, as many parents are realizing, no amount of money can justify sacrificing children's health.
Same Story Elsewhere
Recent examples of similar corporate influence include how in March, the Kentucky state legislature passed a compromise bill that bans soda only in elementary schools. Kentucky nutrition advocates were worn down after battling Coca-Cola lobbyists for four years. Allowing companies to continue to sell soda in middle and high schools was the only way the bill could possibly pass.
Also, Arizona passed a law in April that bans the sale of soft drinks and candy during the school day, but only in kindergarten through eighth grade. The provision that would have extended the ban to high schools was added and removed from the bill several times, but ultimately, the junk food lobby got its way.
And in May, a strong piece of legislation was completely gutted in Oregon thanks to corporate lobbying. The bill would have banned carbonated soft drinks, candy, and fried pastry products in schools. But the law that passed calls only for schools to have "wellness policies." The Oregon Soft Drink Association donated $91,000 in campaign contributions to state politicians last fall. Three key lawmakers--members of the education committee--received $2,000 each.
High-powered Lobbying Tactics
The showdown in Connecticut involved an eight-hour House debate in which lawmakers engaged in such stall tactics as relating memories of being deprived of candy as a child. (Who cares and why is this is a basis for policymaking?) The original bill would have allowed only water, juice, and milk to be sold during the school day, but a compromise reached at the end of the marathon session allowed diet soda and sports drinks to be sold in high schools. Then the bill had to go back to the Senate, where it had already passed. But this time, lawmakers there attempted to delay the process by adding no fewer than 10 unrelated amendments, such as requiring smoke detectors in school bathrooms.
And in a particularly underhanded move, while the bill awaited the governor' s signature, a sign mysteriously appeared on the inside of a high school vending machine that read "Let the state know how you feel about the state getting into your lunch program", followed by Governor Rell's e-mail and phone number. The sign was not approved by the school, as is required for all public postings.
To do its bidding, Coca-Cola hired Patrick Sullivan, of Sullivan & LeShane, which the Hartford Courant has called "the most influential lobbying firm in the state." For his services, Sullivan is paid $80,000 annually by Coca- Cola 's New York division, plus an additional $7,350 a month by its New England subsidiary.
What Connecticut Governor Rell failed to mention in her veto message was her own possible conflict of interest: The other co-founder of this lobbying firm, Patricia LeShane, has served as the governor's campaign advisor.
Proposals to rid schools of unhealthy food and beverages are currently pending in several other states where similar battles are being fought. For example, in California, nutrition advocates are back asking lawmakers to get soda out of high schools, which were exempted from a measure passed two years ago thanks to soda industry lobbying. How many years must go by and how many precious resources must be spent on accomplishing what should be common sense policy? And when will politicians begin to show real leadership by placing the health of our children above corporate profit?
Michele Simon, a public-health attorney who teaches health policy at UC Hastings College of the Law, is director of the Center for Informed Food Choices, a nonprofit in Oakland, Calif.
- end of this article -
The Idaho Observer publishes the Artificially Sweetened Times, 24 page booklets to distribute to friends and families on aspartame. The front page is titled "What Is Happening To Our Children". You can get your copies from www.idaho-observer.com You can distribute to PTA's and schools to alert parents and teachers.
You can also show the movie, Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World, www.docworkers.com at PTA meetings and at lectures in school systems.
Remember that aspartame interacts with vaccines and is a chemical hypersensitivity agent. So when children get off aspartame on to such things as Splenda which is a chlorcarbon poison they can react. Dr. Blaylock's book Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills brings out even when a life child is born of an aspartame user and appears normal, by the time they reach puberty you can see the problems especially behavioral.
Unfortunately, Dr. John Olney's prophecy has been fulfilled. Help save the children. Read below: Report of Ritalin Risks Prompts a Federal Study.
Dr. Betty Martini, Founder, Mission Possible International, 9270 River Club Parkway, Duluth, Georgia 770 242-2599 http://www.wnho.net and http://www.dorway.com Aspartame Toxicity Center, http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame
Report of Ritalin Risks Prompts a Federal Study
By GARDINER HARRIS
New York Times July
1, 2005
ROCKVILLE, Md., June 30 - Federal health officials said Thursday that they were looking into a suggestion by a small Texas study that Ritalin and other stimulant drugs given to children might increase their risk of cancer later in life.
A team of experts from the Food and Drug Administration, the National Institutes of Health and the Environmental Protection Agency went to Texas on May 23 to examine the methods used by the researchers, who found damage to the chromosomes of 12 children who took Ritalin for three months.
Ritalin, which entered the market in 1955, has been used for decades to treat children for attention or hyperactivity problems.
Dr. David Jacobson-Kram of the Office of New Drugs at the food and drug agency said that the study, by researchers at the University of Texas and the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, had flaws in its methodology but that its results could not be dismissed. Drugs that are known to cause cancer cause similar chromosomal changes, Dr. Jacobson-Kram said.
But other scientists cautioned that the study was far too small and its finding far too preliminary to cause alarm. The study did not include a comparison group of children who had not taken Ritalin. And federal officials said there was no reason for children currently taking Ritalin or other stimulants to stop taking them.
Dr. Lawrence Greenhill of Columbia University, an expert on Ritalin and other stimulant drugs used for children, questioned why the government was devoting so many resources to following up on the study's findings. Dr. Greenhill, like many other academic researchers, serves as a consultant for companies that make the drugs.
Several research teams are trying to reproduce the study on a larger scale, using better controls. And federal officials are examining millions of health records to determine if children who took Ritalin decades ago now have higher rates of cancer. The drug agency has also asked the makers of Ritalin-like stimulants to provide it with any information about their drugs' effects on chromosomes.
"I would say that if these data are reproducible, then that would be very concerning," Dr. Jacobson-Kram said.
He added that it would be at least a year before the results of those studies were known.
It is unclear, Dr. Jacobson-Kram said, how Ritalin might damage chromosomes.
"There's no obvious mechanism by which these drugs should be doing this," he said. "And there is nothing about them by which they clue us that they are DNA damaging."
About 29 million prescriptions were written last year in the United States for Ritalin and similar drugs to treat attention deficit disorder and hyperactivity, 23 million of them for children. The drugs are among the most widely prescribed medicines in the world.
Controversy has long surrounded their use, however, with critics saying that the medications are greatly over prescribed.
Dr. Jacobson-Kram made his presentation before an F.D.A. advisory committee called to examine the most recent reports of adverse events among children taking Concerta, a long-acting form of Ritalin. The committee found nothing new or unusual about the reports, which included cases of children who had become psychotic and others who had developed heart problems.
The drug agency said no committee members had conflicts of interest that would prevent them from evaluating the drug's safety in an independent manner.
F.D.A. officials told the committee that the agency planned to change Concerta's label to make the risks of such side effects clearer. Among the mental side effects reported among children taking Concerta were hallucinations, thoughts of suicide, psychotic behaviors and aggression.
"It's not that this is something new or that this is something that's happening at a higher incidence than before," Dr. Paul Andreason, a psychiatrist who is part of the agency's division of neuropharmacologic drug products, told the committee.
But, Dr. Andreason said, descriptions of these problems in the labels of Concerta, Ritalin and similar stimulants are often written in technical language. So the F.D.A. has decided that descriptions of the drugs' potential side effects must be stated more clearly, he said.
Still, agency officials and several committee members said they were not convinced that Concerta caused mental problems like hallucinations and psychosis. Rather, the children taking the drug may also suffer from other mental disorders.
"The agency believes that it is not yet possible to determine whether these events, especially the more serious ones, are causally associated with these treatments," said Dr. Dianne Murphy, director of the Office of Pediatric Therapeutics at the drug agency.
The most common side effects of Ritalin, Concerta and similar drugs are appetite suppression, headaches, abdominal pain and sleep disturbances. Children who take these drugs chronically often weigh less and are shorter in stature as a result.
Aspartame Interacts With ALL Drugs Vaccines And Toxins FCA Put On Notice
From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
February 23, 2005
Who knows more about the toxicity of aspartame than the FDA. Their toxicologists, Doctors Adrian Gross and Jacqueline Verrett strenuously objected to aspartame approval for 16 years. It wasn't just that aspartame is not safe and in original studies triggered brain tumors, seizures and all sorts of other tumors, it was that the manufacturer filtered out what they didn't want FDA to see.
(January 10, l977 in a 33 page letter, FDA Chief Counsel Richard Merrill recommended to U.S. Attorney Sam Skinner that a grand jury investigate Searle for "apparent violations of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.331(e), Act 18 USC 1001, for "their willful and knowing failure to make reports to the Food and Drug Administration required by the Act 21, U.S.C. 355 (i) and for concealing material facts and making false statements in reports of animal studies conducted to establish the safety of (aspartame)," The FDA called special attention to studies investigating the effect of NutraSweet on monkeys and hamsters. ) Both U.S. Prosecutors hired on with the defense team and the statute of limitations expired. Still the FDA kept saying loudly no - no - no!
FDA's Jerome Bressler wrote the brilliant FDA audit, the Bressler Report on http://www.dorway.com in regard to Searle's testing. In speaking with Bressler he told me personally the studies were so bad the worst 20% was removed by FDA when retyped. He also told this to Doctors H. J. Roberts and Dr. Russell Blaylock. Dr. Roberts asked his congressman to get the rest of the report from the FDA who promptly refused.
In the incredible aspartame documentary, Sweet Misery, A Poisoned World, from the very mouth of Attorney James Turner who assisted the famed Dr. John Olney in trying to prevent approval came mind boggling facts! Don Rumsfeld, currently Secretary of Defense, was CEO of Searle and said he would call in his markers and get aspartame approved. To Rumsfeld the fact the FDA said "no" meant only he would have to use politics instead of science to get this neurotoxin approved, knowing full well it would poison the public, causing in humans the injuries seen in lab animals, brain tumors and seizures. He was on Reagan's transition team and the day after Reagan took office Arthur Hull Hayes was appointed to approve this toxin, since no former FDA Commissioner had been willing to do so.
ASPARTAME WAS APPROVED BY PRESIDENTIAL ORDER
President Reagan knew it would take 30 days to get Hayes to FDA so he wrote an executive order making the outgoing FDA Commissioner powerless to oppose aspartame. From the congressional record, Senate, page S5497, May 7, l985:
"Two FDA officials have told Common Cause Magazine that Hayes was determined to push aspartame forward, in part as a signal that the Reagan administration was ushering in a new regulatory era. One official privy to some of the deliberations made at Hayes' level says the "people at the top" were not receptive to important concerns raised about the quality and validity of some of the key tests submitted in support of aspartame."
"There were real questions" about the reliability and interpretation of the data "that were glossed over" at the commissioner's level, this official says, adding that Hayes and his close associates wanted FDA scientists to concentrate on providing rationales for overturning the l980 Public Board of Inquiry instead of focusing on the fact that there were unresolved issues about a number of key tests."
John Hoey, M.D. in reviewing Marcia Angell's book, "The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About It" (10/7/2004) says:
"By Angell's account, the current slide toward the commercialization and corruption of clinical research coincided with the election of President Ronald Reagan in l980 and the passage of the Bayh-Dole Act, a new set of laws that permitted and encouraged universities and small businesses to patent discoveries from research sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Research paid for by the public to serve the public instantly became a private and salable, good, one that is producing drug sales of more than $200 billion a year."
Further, Dr. Hoey in discussing research commercialization said: "The broader effects are felt in the commercialization of universities, medical faculties, and our profession. In 2000, in a letter written in response to Angell's Journal editorial, Is Academic Medicine for Sale?" a reader supplied the answer: No. The current owner is very happy with it. The increasing intrusion of industry into medical education and the almost complete domination of continuing medical education (especially regarding drugs) by the marketing departments of large pharmaceutical companies are a scandal."
When Arthur Hull Hayes got to the FDA a Board of Inquiry was set up with the finest scientists FDA had. They declared: " ..the Board concludes that approval of aspartame for use in foods should be withheld at least until the question concerning its possible oncogenic potential has been resolved by further experiments. The Board has not been presented with proof of a reasonable certainty that aspartame is safe for use as a food additive under its intended conditions of use. "
"ORDER: The foregoing constitutes the Board's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Therefore, it is ORDERED that: (1) Approval of the food additive petition for aspartame (FAP 3A2885) be and it is hereby withdrawn. (2) The stay of the effectiveness of the regulation for aspartame, 21 CFR 172.804, is hereby vacated and the regulation revoked."
--- This PBOI report on 9/3/80 was signed by Walle J. H. Nauta, M.D., Ph.D., Chairman, Peter W. Lampert, M.D., and Vernon R. Young, Ph.D., Member
Dr. Hayes wouldn't take "no" because he was there to get aspartame approved. As the Congressional Record continues, Senate, S5497, May 7, l985: "Hayes decisions to approve aspartame for use in dry foods such as cereals in l981 and soft drinks in l983 does not square with the role of the FDA is supposed to play. The FDA is the government agency that reviews and approves all tests submitted by companies before allowing food additives on the market. The law requires a manufacturer - in this case Searle - to prove to the satisfaction of the FDA that there is a "reasonable certainty" that a food additive is safe. The government does not have to prove that it is harmful - an important distinction. If tests are inconclusive, an additive is not suppose to be approved by the FDA."
When Hayes finished his job to get a neurotoxic drug on the market he hired on with the public relations firm, Burston Marsteller, who represented NutraSweet, for $1000.00 per day as a consultant. Hayes refused to talk to the press since. He had no excuse for approving a toxic drug whose petition was revoked by FDA scientists. Hayes had full knowledge that its a carcinogen in violation of the Delaney Amendment which forbid adding carcinogens to food and drugs.
WHEN FDA WAS PUSHED OFF ITS PEDESTAL: Imagine an intact FDA which tried to do its job of protecting the public, having to proclaim that a horrendous neurotoxic drug is safe. Would could FDA say when asked if aspartame was safe? Could they say "we approved it but its poison"? Probably the only thing they could say was "Ask us no questions and we will tell you no lies." Even today when journalists ask the FDA to comment on aspartame they say: "No comment. See our web site." The web site is just lying industry propaganda. Beginning with Reagan and Hayes the pharmaceutical cartel had the power to get approved the worst drugs. FDA seemed to care not. Their bulletin, the FDA Consumer continued to tout the safety of aspartame and letters to victims whose lives were destroyed said aspartame was the most tested additive in history. Even letters to congressmen lied and lied.
Dr. John Olney knew what aspartame would do to the brains of our children. and discussed it in his report to the Board of Inquiry. In l999 Parents Magazine asked "What's Happening to our Children", announcing that families all over America were experiencing so much depression it was estimated that 1 out of 4 had contemplated suicide. The 50% phenylalanine in aspartame lowers the seizure threshold and depletes serotonin, and can trigger bipolar or manic depression, mood swings, paranoia, hallucination and suicidal tendencies. So our children are medicated instead of educated. Seventy per cent of consumers use aspartame and 40% of the children. Dr. Olney's prophecy is fulfilled.
To get a copy of the congressional record, Board of Inquiry Report and Dr. Olney's Report to the Board of Inquiry on CD you can contact Bob Flint at bobflint@greatfallspro.com . The web site would be www.greatfallspro.com
Three congressional hearings were held by Senator Howard Metzenbaum who wrote a bill to have independent studies done on the problems from aspartame, effect on the fetus, behavioral problems in children, seizures and drug interactions. The producers saw to it that the bill never got out of committee. The last of the heroes of FDA toxicologists Adrian Gross and Jacqueline Verrett testified to no avail. Dr. Adrian Gross said without a shadow of a doubt aspartame causes brain tumors and brain cancer, and violates the Delaney Amendment. His last words were : "And if the FDA violates its own laws who is left to protect the public?"
We are now taking case histories on brain tumors and seizures starting in New York and New Jersey. Dr. Verrett said: "All studies were built on a foundation of sand and should be thrown out." Today's FDA is the handmaiden of the pharmaceutical/chemical cartel. The revolving door is so busy they need a bridge for the traffic. I told all this to Acting Commissioner Dr. Michael Friedman. He defended Monsanto on 60 Minutes when Dr. Olney made world news about the aspartame brain tumor association. Then Friedman hired as Vice President of Searle for big bucks - crime pays well.
In l986 the Community Nutrition Institute in Washington, D.C. petitioned FDA to ban aspartame because so many were having seizures and going blind from the free methyl alcohol in the drug. Aspartame is sold as an additive but it's a neurotoxic drug. FDA law requires an additive be inert or non-reactive. The medical text on aspartame disease lists countless diseases and symptoms and drug interactions by the toxin.
ASPARTAME DISEASE RAGES, INTERACTS WITH ALL DRUGS, VACCINES AND TOXINS.
When aspartame was news, Dr. H. J. Roberts in a press conference foretold that in 5 or 10 years we would have a global plague. And it was Dr. Roberts who declared Aspartame Disease to be a global plague and published the medical text in 2001, Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, www.sunsentpress.com or 1 800 827 7991.
His chapter on drug interaction goes into Coumadin, Dilantin, antidepressants and other psychotropic agents, Inderal, Aldomet, hormones and insulin. He says aspartame interacts with all cardiac medication and even discusses drug reactions after the cessation of aspartame.
In his general considerations he discusses that aspartame may either reduce or potentiate drug action by various mechanisms. He lists a few of the possibilities.
* Alteration of the blood proteins to which drugs attach.
* Alteration of drug receptors on cell membranes.
* Changes in the sites at which impulses are transmitted along nerves and to muscle.
* Metabolic abnormalities in the elderly that are known to enhance their vulnerability to drug reactions (Weber l986). This problem increases in the case of persons taking multiple drugs ("polypharmacy") prescribed by several physicians.
* Interference with drug action by amino acids and protein. An example is the erratic therapeutic effects when patients with parkinsonism who were controlled on levodopa began to use aspartame products. The antagonism of levodopa by dietary protein presumably reflects impaired transport from serum across the blood brain barrier by neutral amino acids (Pincus l986).
Dr. Roberts also discusses Lidocaine (Xylocaine) which he says is an important drug used for local anesthesia and the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias in intensive care units. Alterations of its pharmacology by aspartame require study. He says: "Kim et al (l987) reported that the intraperitoneal administration of aspartame significantly reduced the 50% convulsion dose of lidocaine. They indicated that PKU patients and asymptomatic PKU heterozygotes may be more sensitive to the toxic effects of this and related local anesthetics."
Today Dr. Roberts explained: "An interaction should be suspect with virtually every drug if the patient is using aspartame."
This goes along with conversations with Dr. James Bowen who says because aspartame damages the mitocondria of the cell it will interact with all drugs and as a chemical hypersensitization agent will interact with vaccines, unsafe sweeteners like Splenda or sucralose ( chlorinated hydrocarbon) and toxins.
Dr. Bowen wrote about the biochemical interactions between aspartame and other poisons including many pharmaceuticals illustrated in Dr. Roberts medical text and said Dr. Mercola's web site has them as well. Further he wrote: "Because aspartame in the processes of digestion and metabolism, forms about ten other known severe poisonings, and intermediate metabolites, it's potential for drug related interactions is immeasurable. To top that off, the aspartame molecule is so heinously poisonous in different ways that it never passed a single FDA standard toxicity test! So Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of aspartame manufacturer Searle employed political power to get it approved, after the FDA for 16 years refused to allow it on the market because of aspartame toxicity. Then Reagan took direct executive measures to paralyze FDA from further action against aspartame.
Our FDA has never been the same since. Deadly chemicals now being blessed by FDA are marketed as wholesome pharmaceuticals, are just the tip of the iceberg, and result of Rumsfeld's damage to FDA. If any concern whatsoever for human welfare still existed, aspartame would be immediately pulled from the market! The reasonable FDA lawful standard is that a chemical must pass all toxicity tests at one hundred times the "maximum human dose," in order to pass as a food additive. What the original tests showed is that at a dose of three cans of pop per day, scaled to the weight of the animal, aspartame releases DKP, a recognized virulent brain carcinogen. No other chemical causes the brain cancer rate to jump as much."
Dr. Bowen continues, "Aspartame is a known destroyer of DNA. The mitocondrial DNA (MtDNA) is especially damaged, yielding the present epidemic of diseases aspartame consuming mothers pass on to all future generations. Aspartame also directly damages the mitochondria, thus having a "double whammy" effect on mitochondrial function! The summation of these many known severe toxicities and its immune, genetic, mitochondrial, and metabolic damages, make clear that aspartame will not only cause many diseases, which the FDA and CDC have already noted but it has pathways of approach to interact adversely with every conceivable pharmaceutical. My forth coming book: "Sweet Mystery in The Present Darkness: Whatever Happened to We Scientists Who First Spoke Out Against Aspartame?" will delve into all of this in greater detail and more specificity."
The Citizens Clearinghouse for Hazardous Waste wrote in the spring of l996 the article: "The Rising Rates of Health Problems - Is There A Toxic Connection? Stephen Lester.
It might as well have been written about aspartame because the diseases it lists are all ones that have been written about as triggered by aspartame, from birth defects to chemical sensitives. Under the title Cancer Lester says:
"When has gone wrong with our way of thinking when it is considered "normal" that 1 in 3 people get cancer? IT IS NOT NORMAL.. Cancer is not a natural disease and even if it were, it wouldn't be "normal" for cancer to claim the lives of 25% of the population. " Again, one can only think of aspartame when in original studies it triggered brain, mammary, uterine, ovarian, testicular, thyroid and pancreatic tumors and violated the Delaney Amendment. The Pharmaceutical and Chemical cartel know aspartame violates the law, so one would ask is that why the Delaney Amendment was repealed? When a law for the safety of the public gets in their way of marking poison they simply do away with the law.
In June it will be 3 years since I petitioned the FDA to ban aspartame because I have the FDA records and they lie to the public. The law states they have 180 days to answer. Their letter to me states they have more important things to do. So the FDA continues to recall drugs that interact and leave the poison aspartame on the market. Aspartame triggers an irregular heart rhythm and interacts with all cardiac Rx. It damages the cardiac conduction system and causes sudden death. With people dropping dead so fast that defibrillators are now sold over the counter, they took the opportunity to pull ephedra (Chinese MaHaung )off the market when an athlete died who was using Diet coke. Dr. John Olney reviewed the FDA records on ephedra and found it to be safe. One attorney said, "it wasn't Chinese Mahaung at all, but the drug that caused some problems." So what does the FDA do, leave the drug on the market causing the problems and snatches a safe supplement in their continuing loyalty to the pharmaceutical cartel.
MSG has an additive and synergistic effect with aspartame. Is that why the glutamate industry used aspartame as their placebo, so they could show that one excitotoxin does not react more than the placebo when, in fact, the aspartic acid in aspartame is also an excitotoxin. They started doing this before aspartame was approved, so it was well known in the industry that aspartame would react. The records found in the FDA files by Jack Samuels (www.truthinlabeling.org) who filed suit against the FDA on labeling of MSG, showed the FDA had known all along and the industry had been doing this for 25 years against the law. While the FDA had to admit it was wrong they did nothing, again giving their loyalty the glutamate industry.
One can only remember the words of Dr. James Bowen to the FDA over 18 years ago: "Aspartame is mass poisoning of the American public and over 70+ countries of the world". What does it take to save the people from this poison when government lies?
Dr. John Hoey, writing about the book The Truth About the Drug Companies says according to Angell, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, the pharmaceutical industry's U.S. trade association has "the largest lobby in Washington," which in 2002 employed 675 lobbyists (including 26 former members of Congress) at a cost of more than $91 million. The result has been above-average growth in corporate profits during both Republican and Democratic administrations.
The most recent and perplexing lobbying effort caused Congress explicitly to prohibit Medicare from using its huge purchasing power to get lower prices for drugs, thus opening up a dollar pipeline, in the form of higher drug prices, directly from taxpayers to corporate coffers. These changes, along with the cave-in by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in l997 that permitted direct-to-consumer advertising to bypass mention in their ads of all but the most serious side effects, have further augmented profits. The overall effect has been a corruption not only of science but also of the dissemination of Science." No wonder new books keep being published like Dr. Carolyn Dean's "Death of Medicine".
Dr. Betty Martini
Founder, Mission Possible Intl
9270 River Club Parkway
Duluth, Georgia 30097
770 242-2599
http://www.wnho.net and http://www.dorway.com
New Aspartame Information List - click on banner on www.wnho.net
Books on aspartame, including medical text, Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, www.sunsentpress.com or 1 800 827 7991 by H. J. Roberts, M.D.
Books on aspartame by Dr. Russell Blaylock, M.D., www.russellblaylockmd.com
Movie on aspartame - contact cori@soundandfuryproductions.com
Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World
FDA Studies Show Aspartame Link To Brain Tumors
From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
April 12, 2005
ATLANTA (PRWEB) April 12, 2005 -- Consumer rights advocacy group Mission Possible is leading a campaign to fill a product liability lawsuit with New York and New Jersey residents whose brain tumors may be linked to the consumption of the artificial sweetener aspartame (NutraSweet/Equal/Spoonful, etc.).
"Neither congressional hearings or repeated petitions calling for a ban have stopped aspartame manufacturers from exposing the public to this sweet poison. In fact, aspartame producers are reporting increased sales and boasting the marketplace addition of 'neotame,' a new aspartame product," explained Mission Possible International Founder Betty Martini.
For 16 years, the FDA resisted pressure to approve aspartame due to safety studies linking the artificial sweetener to numerous adverse reactions, including the development of brain tumors in animal studies. In 1977, FDA investigator Jerome Bressler released a report describing how, in clinical studies submitted to the FDA, Searle removed aspartame-induced brain tumors that developed in lab rats and placed them back into the study. If the rats died, Bressler reported, Searle would resurrect them on paper.
In a personal conversation with Martini and prominent aspartame experts, Doctors H. J. Roberts and Russell Blaylock he admitted the studies were so bad FDA removed 20% of the most damaging data of his report.
Three years after Donald Rumsfeld became CEO of Searle, aspartame was approved for use in dry goods. To find out how he accomplished this feat, click into the new movie, "Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World and hear the words of renowned Washington Consumer Attorney James Turner as he speaks about President Reagan's Executive Order: http://www.soundandfury.tv/pages/Rumsfeld2.html
Since its 1981 approval, the FDA has published a list of 92 symptoms of aspartame poisoning, which includes headaches, vision loss including blindness, seizures, neurological problems, cardiovascular problems and death. The FDA admits adverse reactions to aspartame comprise about 80 percent of consumer complaints it receives each year. Martini has been networking victims, scientists, and physicians under an umbrella of scientific data and published medical literature that has been growing since Mission Possible formed in 1992.
Having exhausted her executive and administrative remedies regarding the removal of aspartame from the marketplace, Martini is convinced that, "Litigation is the only way to spare consumers the misery of aspartame poisoning." Martini's reasoning is supported in the outcomes of recent product liability controversies. It was class action lawsuits -- not government agency intervention -- that forced the epidemic of Vioxx-induced heart attacks out into the open where the FDA had to take administrative action, banning sales of the dangerous pain relief drug. Information from the experts and in medical texts show aspartame is actually a neurotoxic drug that interacts with other drugs and vaccinations.
The story of how aspartame was discovered and approved by the FDA has been pieced together over the years through documents obtained by Mission Possible. That aspartame overcame FDA neurotoxicity concerns and is now found in over 7,000 commonly consumed foods, beverages and medical preparations is a case study of how power politics trumps science and public safety in the product approval process.
In one set of documents, aspartame producer G.D. Searle used poor people from six third-world countries as test subjects for a study conducted in 1983/84. The data shows that, over the 18-month duration of the study, some of the subjects developed brain tumors; others began to experience seizures. In one case, a pregnant woman spontaneously aborted, began hemorrhaging and then disappeared from the study.
The study showed that the numbers of people whose brains and central nervous systems are adversely affected by aspartame are statistically significant enough to warrant a review of its status as an FDA-approved artificial sweetener. But the FDA was not provided with the results of the Searle study nor was it allowed to review the clinical data.
A study was done at Kings College in England by Dr. Peter Nunn in 1999 on aspartame and brain tumors. Monsanto insisted that aspartame could not cause brain tumors because it doesn't get in the blood stream even though Martini says industry's own studies shows it does and released this information in a report, which can be read at: http://www.rense.com/health3/asptumor.htm .
In the result of this study it said: "Interestingly, when we exposed human brain tumor cells to nitrosated DKP the cells became more motile and their rate of proliferation was significantly elevated. While it is somewhat early to speculate, it is possible that the aspartame breakdown product may be capable of enhancing the rate of malignant progression of pre-existing (and possibly clinically silent, undiagnosed) tumors in the brain." This was exactly what the famed neuroscientist Dr. John Olney said when he made world news in l996 over the aspartame/brain tumor association.
Monsanto, the maker of the controversial bovine growth hormone that has been linked to the development of cancer in humans and cattle, bought Searle (and the rights to produce aspartame) in 1985. They sold in l999 to other companies.
The prevalence of brain tumors in the U.S. has been increasing steadily since the early 1980s. Today, about 70 percent of adults and 40 percent of children are regular consumers of products that contain aspartame.
"There is not one shred of evidence to suggest that aspartame is safe. Yet, our files are overflowing with studies and reports proving that aspartame is a not a food additive but a neurotoxic drug that breaks down to a brain tumor agent, DKP. And now, 25 years later, we have epidemic proportions of people developing brain tumors and a full spectrum of other neurological disorders," Martini said.
Aspartame's road to marketplace approval and its effect on public health is extremely well documented. The aspartame story has been described in the 1,038-page medical text
'Aspartame Disease - An Ignored Epidemic' by H.J. Roberts, MD. http://www.sunsentpress.com
'Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills' by neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D., also describes these problems. http://www.russellblaylockmd.com
Former aspartame-induced multiple-sclerosis sufferer Cori Brackett traveled over 7,000 miles to interview physicians, scientists, attorneys and FDA investigators about aspartame neurotoxicity and how then former (and now current) Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld used his political muscle to achieve aspartame's FDA approval. The result is the powerful video documentary "Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World" http://www.soundandfuryproductions.com
The largest collection of aspartame-related studies, reports and case histories available anywhere in the world can be found online at http://www.dorway.com , the Mission Possible website. Aspartame Toxicity Center is http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame
New York and New Jersey residents who believe they may qualify as a plaintiff in a product liability lawsuit against aspartame producers are encouraged to contact Mission Possible at (770) 242-2599. To qualify, one must be able to establish themselves as an aspartame consumer prior to developing a brain tumor and fall within the three-year statute of limitations.
Contact
Dr. Betty Martini
770 242-2599
Mission Possible International
9270 River Club Parkway
Duluth, Georgia 30097
Contact Information
Betty Martini
Mission Possible International
http://www.rense.com/health3/asptumor.htm
770 242-2599
Disclaimer: If you have any questions regarding information in these press releases please contact the company listed in the press release. Please do not contact PR Web. We will be unable to assist you with your inquiry. PR Web disclaims any content contained in these releases. Our complete disclaimer appears http://www.prweb.com//disclaimer.php here.
The Lethal Science Of Splenda A Poisonous Chlorocarbon
From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum
By James Bowen, M.D.
May 8, 2005
James Bowen, M.D., A physician, biochemist, and survivor of aspartame poisoning warns about yet another synthetic sweetener, Splenda.
HAWAII -- The chemical sucralose, marketed as "Splenda", has replaced aspartame as the #1 artificial sweetener in foods and beverages. Aspartame has been forced out by increasing public awareness that it is both a neurotoxin and an underlying cause of chronic illness worldwide. Dr. James Bowen, Researcher and biochemist, reports:
"Splenda/sucralose is simply chlorinated sugar; a chlorocarbon. Common chlorocarbons include carbon tetrachloride, trichlorethelene and methylene chloride, all deadly. Chlorine is nature's Doberman attack dog, a highly excitable, ferocious atomic element employed as a biocide in bleach, disinfectants, insecticide, WWI poison gas and hydrochloric acid.
"Sucralose is a molecule of sugar chemically manipulated to surrender three hydroxyl groups (hydrogen + oxygen) and replace them with three chlorine atoms. Natural sugar is a hydrocarbon built around 12 carbon atoms. When turned into Splenda it becomes a chlorocarbon, in the family of Chlorodane, Lindane and DDT,
"It is logical to ask why table salt, which also contains chlorine, is safe while Splenda/sucralose is toxic? Because salt isn't a chlorocarbon. When molecular chemistry binds sodium to chlorine to make salt carbon isn't included. Sucralose and salt are as different as oil and water.
"Unlike sodium chloride, chlorocarbons are never nutritionally compatible with our metabolic processes and are wholly incompatible with normal human metabolic functioning. When chlorine is chemically reacted into carbon-structured organic compounds to make chlorocarbons, the carbon and chlorine atoms bind to each other by mutually sharing electrons in their outer shells. This arrangement adversely affects human metabolism because our mitochondrial and cellular enzyme systems are designed to completely utilize organic molecules containing carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and other compatible nutritional elements.
"By this process chlorocarbons such as sucralose deliver chlorine directly into our cells through normal metabolization. This makes them effective insecticides and preservatives. Preservatives must kill anything alive to prevent bacterial decomposition."
Dr. Bowen believes ingested chlorocarbon damage continues with the formation of other toxins: "Any chlorocarbons not directly excreted from the body intact can cause immense damage to the processes of human metabolism and, eventually, our internal organs. The liver is a detoxification organ which deals with ingested poisons. Chlorocarbons damage the hepatocytes, the liver's metabolic cells, and destroy them. In test animals Splenda produced swollen livers, as do all chlorocarbon poisons, and also calcified the kidneys of test animals in toxicity studies. The brain and nervous system are highly subject to metabolic toxicities and solvency damages by these chemicals. Their high solvency attacks the human nervous system and many other body systems including genetics and the immune function. Thus, chlorocarbon poisoning can cause cancer, birth defects, and immune system destruction. These are well known effects of Dioxin and PCBs which are known deadly chlorocarbons."
Dr. Bowen continues: "Just like aspartame, which achieved marketplace approval by the Food and Drug Administration when animal studies clearly demonstrated its toxicity, sucralose also failed in clinical trials with animals. Aspartame created brain tumors in rats. Sucralose has been found to shrink thymus glands (the biological seat of immunity) and produce liver inflammation in rats and mice.
"In the coming months we can expect to see a river of media hype expounding the virtues of Splenda/sucralose. We should not be fooled again into accepting the safety of a toxic chemical on the blessing of the FDA and saturation advertising. In terms of potential long-term human toxicity we should regard sucralose with its chemical cousin DDT, the insecticide now outlawed because of its horrendous long term toxicities at even minute trace levels in human, avian, and mammalian tissues.
"Synthetic chemical sweeteners are generally unsafe for human consumption. This toxin was given the chemical name "sucralose" which is a play on the technical name of natural sugar, sucrose. One is not the other. One is food, the other is toxic; don't be deceived."
Dr. Bowen also calls attention to another seldom recognized and deadly permanent effect of these chemicals: "Aspartame, sold as NutraSweet, Equal, E951, Canderel, Benevia and under other names, is a hypersensitization agent which causes Polychemical Sensitivity syndrome. Chlorocarbons strongly induce uncurable hypersensitivity diseases which are now becoming rampant." (James Bowen, M.D.)
Doctor Bowen has spent 20 years researching artificial sweeteners after his use of aspartame resulted in being diagnosed with Lou Gehrig's disease. Dr Bowen's intention is to warn the world of the toxicity of tabletop poisons like aspartame, Splenda and Neotame.
For more information on aspartame and Splenda click on the Aspartame Information List on http://www.wnho.net . Dr. Bowen can be seen in the movie "Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World" For the movie call 1 818 349 8822 or email cori@soundandfuryproductions.com See how aspartame was approved by clicking on http://www.soundandfury.tv/pages/Rumsfeld2.html
Aspartame and Splenda Toxicity Centers,
http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame
Aspartame and brain tumors cases for litigation contact Dr. Betty Martini at Bettym19@mindspring.com or 770 242-2599. Currently taking states New York, New Jersey, Madison County, Illinois and Mississippi
A medical text, Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic by H. J. Roberts, M.D. presents, 1038 pages of aspartame horrors. http://www.sunsentpress.com or 1 800 827 7991
Russell Blaylock, M.D., has published Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills on the
subject, http://www.russellblaylockmd.com
Dr. Betty Martini says "the controversy rages over Splenda (sucralose). Is it safe and natural like sugar or is it a chlorinated hydrocarbon? As lawsuits fly, consider the chemistry of this artificial compound."
She adds: "The FDA denied approval of aspartame for 16 years, then caved in to political/economic pressure when Don Rumsfeld, CEO of the manufacturer, was brought to Washington by Ronald Reagan. A new FDA Commissioner was appointed to approve it then became a consultant for NutraSweet's public relations firm for $1,000/day on a 10 year contract. Forthcoming has been a global epidemic of disability and death. One might expect FDA to be more cautious next time, yet FDA approved the toxic chlorocarbon Splenda without hesitation and without any long term testing on human subjects."
Dr. Betty Martini
MISSION POSSIBLE INTERNATIONAL,
9270 River Club Parkway, Duluth, Georgia 30097
http://www.wnho.net and http://www.dorway.com
770 242-2599